GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

There is one major reason why I don't accept that "Future PC" excuse - Why the hell does the game look better on those, let's be honest, gimped computers called Consoles? Shadows look so much better, view distance is great and it's running native 720p ( Well, on the 360 ) - Why the hell can't a computer with 4-5x the power run the same specs at a decent frame rate? It has poor optimization written all over it and Rockstar really need to pull their **** together.

Because it has obviously been tampered with or runs a different version, perhaps even a console shot.

Can never trust official screenshots

I guess we learnt that lesson the hard way. I bought GTA IV for the PC assuming it would look and run better. Boy was I wrong.

Supposedly, this is a PC screenshot of GTA IV. Why do the shadows look better? Beats me. It even looks like AA has been applied.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

This is the reason why I started to back away from PC gaming, so many decent games these days suffer from porting issues and lazy developers. Granted my games does run fine, I could still be one of the unlucky ones. Last time I bought and messed around with a PC game was Crysis, we all know the story about that one.

No wonder why the PC scene isn't getting much love these days :/

Mine has been working better recently - its now playable with medium graphics at 1920 x 1080. The new 8.12 ATI driver made a world of difference, only problem now is some shadows still appear a little 'meshy'. I'm hoping with the hopefully forthcomming patch, and my new Core i7 Dell XPS things should further improve.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

Nah if you render a video using the video clip function it plays back really smooth, i get 20odd fps but rendered a video out to 720p wmv and it plays smooth.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

That person is using a Q6600 OC'd to 3.9 GHz, 6GB of RAM, and an HD 4850. It isn't surprising that it can run the game decently. The question is: What settings does he/she play at to make it run reasonably well? I have an E6750, 4GB of RAM, and an HD 4870. I get about 31 fps @ 1680x1050 (medium settings).

This is the reason why I started to back away from PC gaming, so many decent games these days suffer from porting issues and lazy developers. Granted my games does run fine, I could still be one of the unlucky ones. Last time I bought and messed around with a PC game was Crysis, we all know the story about that one.

No wonder why the PC scene isn't getting much love these days :/

I think we should put away our pitchforks and fire for now, so to speak. Wait for the patch and official drivers from ATI/NVIDIA. If the performance issues and bugs are still there, then lay the game to waste.

Mine has been working better recently - its now playable with medium graphics at 1920 x 1080. The new 8.12 ATI driver made a world of difference, only problem now is some shadows still appear a little 'meshy'. I'm hoping with the hopefully forthcomming patch, and my new Core i7 Dell XPS things should further improve.

You're using the beta version of Catalyst 8.12 right? I can't find the final release on AMD's website yet. I'm tempted to use that driver but I always stay away from beta drivers. They're a disaster waiting to happen.

8.12 got leaked, I too usualy stay away from beta drivers but was desperate to play gta iv.

8.12 do nothing for me, i was able to get it to run at 35fps, which is ok, but then alas, i was in the middle of a mission and then i got RESC10 error, and of course i lost all my progress, im done with it for now, its just a joke that they left errors like that in the final version of the game.

I think we should put away our pitchforks and fire for now, so to speak. Wait for the patch and official drivers from ATI/NVIDIA. If the performance issues and bugs are still there, then lay the game to waste.

I don't see why we can't demand a working, polished product? This was not released as a Beta test or a free trial - We should demand an optimized game that just works. Why is it PC users always needs to get treated as beta testers? We pay for our games, why do console gamers usually get a product that just works ...

This is a big thumbs down for Rockstar, yes they have time to fix it but won't change our first impression of the game.

8.12 got leaked, I too usualy stay away from beta drivers but was desperate to play gta iv.

The official 8.12 drivers? :o

I don't see why we can't demand a working, polished product? This was not released as a Beta test or a free trial - We should demand an optimized game that just works. Why is it PC users always needs to get treated as beta testers? We pay for our games, why do console gamers usually get a product that just works ...

This is a big thumbs down for Rockstar, yes they have time to fix it but won't change our first impression of the game.

I understand your frustration, trust me. I almost felt robbed after playing the game. The unfortunate thing is we can't get a refund so why dwell on how poorly optimized the game is? It's better to hope for the best. I sincerely hope a patch + optimized drivers will deliver a better GTA IV gaming experience.

Would everyone feel better if they renamed "medium" to "high"? Heck, would you feel better if they called it ultra? What about "your graphics card makes your penis larger"? Would that make you feel better?

I want games that push systems. It is not about the settings, but how it looks. Crysis looked 50% better at medium that almost all other games on high (or ultra, or OMG your penis is so large). The same can be said about GTA.

Would everyone feel better if they renamed "medium" to "high"? Heck, would you feel better if they called it ultra? What about "your graphics card makes your penis larger"? Would that make you feel better?

I want games that push systems. It is not about the settings, but how it looks. Crysis looked 50% better at medium that almost all other games on high (or ultra, or OMG your penis is so large). The same can be said about GTA.

Not really...

The game runs acceptably for me and I have a Q6700 with a 4870 512 and 4GB of Ram.

This game runs better than most people say I think. Even sill, it will be much better when optimised graphic drivers are released and the game is patched up. Im not 100% happy with the way this game runs but I know that this happens and I know it can (and will) be improved. People need to stop moaning about every little thing that makes them unhappy. And why not accept the "designed for a computer that is in the future" excuse, Crysis had the same reason?

So this is something that's been bugging me with new games left and right.

Basically, Why are more and more developers relying on GPU manufacturers to do the work of optimizing their games for them? Are they that lazy(or perhaps incompetent) that they can't do it on their own anymore? A game should be able to run fine from the day it's released, not only when new drivers are made specifically for it.

So this is something that's been bugging me with new games left and right.

Basically, Why are more and more developers relying on GPU manufacturers to do the work of optimizing their games for them? Are they that lazy(or perhaps incompetent) that they can't do it on their own anymore? A game should be able to run fine from the day it's released, not only when new drivers are made specifically for it.

I doubt its laziness or incompetence, more likely pressure from publishers or internal targets. If the game works well with a new patch AND new drivers then why moan about it? I mean its not perfect for me either but I don't expect everything to be.

Also don't compare this to a console release, its a completely different scenario. Consoles have all the same hardware so developing and testing it is pretty simple. PCs on the other hand have an unlimited combination of hardware and software making testing a very difficult game indeed.

I've been playing it today and so far I've managed to tweak it for the better. Still lacks FSAA and a desperate need to solve the texture pop in issue on HIGH settings.

Screens + more info here: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthrea...=1#post13044114

After I updated to the latest nVidia Beta drivers, my In-game graphic settings keep resetting each time I start the game - Anyone else had that problem?

Me (Y) Doubt it's driver related, though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!