GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

The Logitech issue will apparently be fixed in the next patch, though it is better to get a 360 pad if possible, they are by far the best pads I have ever used, and you can pick them up quite cheap

Also, if anyones thinking of purchasing the pc edition. bear in mind:

Keyboard/mouse mapping is implemented disgustingly:

Cannot map a function to two different key presses.

Cannot map mouse buttons 4 or 5 AT ALL (forward and back buttons on keyboard) --- Yes this is a deal breaker for me.

This is outrageous. They've ruined an awesome game by halfassing the porting, throwing gratuitous use of drm and ridiculous barriers of entry for online play.

If youre interested: I emailed R* in the hopes that maybe in the future they would patch these basic to-be-expected functions into the game. The reply was in essence "we arent doing jack about that youre on your own"

I was hoping that the Games for Windows certification process would put some polish and lowest common denominator requirements into games. All it has been is the homogenization of in-game UI so one can use it with Microsoft's 360 controller.

aye patch is out but for me has done bugger all the only 2 things i can see is that they hardcoded the '-norestrictions- and '-nomemrestrict' into the games exe and tweeked the benchmark to run smoother, but fps in the game is worse for me now i could pull 25fps before the patch, now im down to 19fps

EDIT:

Ok so after the patch i was getting ♥♥♥♥ fps, so i decided, right the game cant get anywhere than it is now so i decided to install the 180.84 (beta3 drivers) from guru3d.com, now normally i uninstall the old driver first, but this time i left them alone and just installed over the top of the old 180.48's.

As normal it asked for a restart so i did, then while i was in POST i deicded.... ♥♥♥♥ it i'll overclock my cpu a little, i took the fsb from 200, upto 212.

Now my processor is the AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dualcore which its stock speed is 3.0Ghz, the increased fsb has taken it to just below 3.2Ghz (3.18Ghz if you wanna nitpick)

Then i checked my commandlist.txt file in my program files root folder and the only line i have in is -fullspecaudio.

So i ran the game now my ingame settings are as follows

1280x1024x70Hrtz

Texture Quality: Medium

Render Quality: Medium

View Distance: 15

Detail Distance: 15

Traffic: 15

and i really did notice a good fps increase, now i didnt run frap this time so i cant get an exact figure, BUT i was playing for a good 20-30 mins and i went from 1 island to another and even went into 'Star junction' and it was really smooth

I hope this gives some people a few ideas or theorys on how to come up with the next user fix

EDIT: heres my CPU-Z report if anyone wants to have a shimmy http://*malware domain*/show_oc.php?id=462124

I'm getting stable 30 fps with the new patch on the same settings but with view distance at 22 and traffic at 13. I found the most cpu intensive settings are shadow density, traffic and detail distance. You can probably ramp the view distance up with no problem on that GTX.

X2 5600+ 2.9ghz

4gb ram

9600gt

only startup command is fullspec audio. I even get like 40 fps indoors outside now I get nice 30-35 in the day time it it used to be really bad for me during the day pre patch. I almost wanna see if I can turn up my traffic density a bit now.

Slightly changed my PC specs, dropped in a spare E6320 1.86ghz cpu and an extra 2gb ram (the quad core is now sold as I get my XPS i7 soon). It immediately required re-activation and the new patch automagically installed. Performance seeems worse a lot less smooth, but the game feels less buggy (if that makes sense). I reckon the CPU makes the difference, so hopefully i7 + 4gb + patch = smooth and reliable

EDIT: Oh and I'm using the 8.12 drivers, been working really well for last week with the system in signature, just a little buggy at times.

Slightly changed my PC specs, dropped in a spare E6320 1.86ghz cpu and an extra 2gb ram (the quad core is now sold as I get my XPS i7 soon). It immediately required re-activation and the new patch automagically installed. Performance seeems worse a lot less smooth, but the game feels less buggy (if that makes sense). I reckon the CPU makes the difference, so hopefully i7 + 4gb + patch = smooth and reliable

EDIT: Oh and I'm using the 8.12 drivers, been working really well for last week with the system in signature, just a little buggy at times.

well yeah you went from a quad to a lower end dual core on a extremely cpu dependent game...

well yeah you went from a quad to a lower end dual core on a extremely cpu dependent game...

Meh the dual core isnt bad, 1066mhz/4mb and it only has to last a week or so.

I thought it was a more GPU/RAM dependant game??

The patch just destroyed me ... no SFX at all, no ammo counter, no fixes...

game still thinks I only have 500mb of vram when I have a 1gb, performance maybe smoother by 1fps but again... no SFX.

Every related forum in the world seems to be full of people claiming the patch made things worse, I can't reinstall because I will not be able to use my saves in offline mode I believe.... what a horrible experience this is.

Also, if anyones thinking of purchasing the pc edition. bear in mind:

Keyboard/mouse mapping is implemented disgustingly:

Cannot map a function to two different key presses.

Cannot map mouse buttons 4 or 5 AT ALL (forward and back buttons on keyboard) --- Yes this is a deal breaker for me.

This is outrageous. They've ruined an awesome game by halfassing the porting, throwing gratuitous use of drm and ridiculous barriers of entry for online play.

If youre interested: I emailed R* in the hopes that maybe in the future they would patch these basic to-be-expected functions into the game. The reply was in essence "we arent doing jack about that youre on your own"

I was hoping that the Games for Windows certification process would put some polish and lowest common denominator requirements into games. All it has been is the homogenization of in-game UI so one can use it with Microsoft's 360 controller.

PC Gamers should make this a MS problem because r* are just messing with windows now, MS can't accept this... even tho they have the xbox they focus alot of resources on the PC as a gaming platform.

This is possible the worst pc game i have ever seen

First of I had to install rockstar social club (why?)

Second I had to install an update for Games for Windows Live (again why?)

Then it needs to verify the date on the internet??

Then i had to insert a serial so thay it could activate on the internet.

Then I needed to register a live account (I don't want to play the multiplayer btw)

Then it still needs the dvd in the drive to play, after all that you would expect at least not to have to use the disc.

When I get the game to start I have the same bug as most people which is I can't see anything (except car lights for some reason)

So I download the update nVidia Drivers : no difference

So then I wait for this miracle from Rockstar

and now all I get is the "TEXP70 Unable to create depth render target - Please re-install DirectX and/or install the latest video card driver." error....

.... so I reinstall the game and the nVidia drivers and still the same error.

I only play Pc games and some of them have been buggy on release, but I've never seen anything like this peace of ****. This will be the first game that I will be returning (hopefully play.com will take it back)

And when or if they fix this pile of crap, i'm just gonna download it , illegally **** 'em

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!