GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

I doubt you'll have any trouble running GTA4 with those specs honestly. I mean, sure the game is a bit buggy and it's possible your performance may take a hit due to a bug, but with those specs you should be able to run it fine. The Gametrailers.com comparasion video would be a good way to gauge if you want to look at it like that. They were running it on a C2D as well (don't remember which model though) and similar specs to you except a 4850 video card. And it ran perfectly fine for them save for a few slow downs here and there.

I doubt you'll have any trouble running GTA4 with those specs honestly. I mean, sure the game is a bit buggy and it's possible your performance may take a hit due to a bug, but with those specs you should be able to run it fine. The Gametrailers.com comparasion video would be a good way to gauge if you want to look at it like that. They were running it on a C2D as well (don't remember which model though) and similar specs to you except a 4850 video card. And it ran perfectly fine for them save for a few slow downs here and there.

the game isnt buggy, search google about commandline and you can remove the graphics restrictions and run your game faster, trust me commandline works really well.

Also i love this game man but its hard to find ranked servers with alot of people in them to play multiplayer hem hem :p

I get no slow downs

1680x1050, Very High, High

Geforce 9800GT Hybridpower

22" LG LCD 2MS

Quad Core Q6600

anyway go find yourself Nvidia v181 drivers, they might make an improvement but i think the new release brings support for OpenGL 3.0 only and no speed improvments.

:)

Edited by atleeit

Alrite cool, i'll it after xmas.

What would be better on, retail or stream? since I already use stream a lot.

I'll try those 181 drivers, but I heard people still getting the same black screen as i do with 180.xx drivers.

What fps u gettin btw atleeit?

Alrite cool, i'll it after xmas.

What would be better on, retail or stream? since I already use stream a lot.

I'll try those 181 drivers, but I heard people still getting the same black screen as i do with 180.xx drivers.

What fps u gettin btw atleeit?

Well Steam installs the game to steam folder but it will still run through Windows game live and also Rockstar club, So basically it doesn't matter what you choose, If you got 14GB free to download through steam then go ahead or connect to a free quota steam content server to get the files free after you purchase it.

I will let you know my FPS later, i get no skips and can speed through levels without slow down so i'm pretty sure i get decent fps

I get no black screens, what do you mean? in graphics settings remove all the distance viewable etc and place on 0, all settings on 0.

I'll guess i'll buy it, since i cba downloading it n be much easier.

Theres a known problem with a few nvidia GFX cards and the 180.00 drives where in my case, it black screen during installation so its only half installed and total screws windows up.

A-lot of people are having this problem and currently discussing it on the nvidia forums.

ATM my current drivers are 178.24.

Here's the post if ur interested:

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=84478&st=0

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=83696

I'll guess i'll buy it, since i cba downloading it n be much easier.

Theres a known problem with a few nvidia GFX cards and the 180.00 drives where in my case, it black screen during installation so its only half installed and total screws windows up.

A-lot of people are having this problem and currently discussing it on the nvidia forums.

ATM my current drivers are 178.24.

Here's the post if ur interested:

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=84478&st=0

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=83696

Well it's wierd i have a Gigabyte EP45 Board with Nvidia 9800GT Hybridpower and i have used all 17x's and i had been running 180x's for a while now and just installed 181 this morning with no problems. I will plat GTA IV tonight and let you know.

Windows Vista SP1 :)

There's a new mod tool out called Alice, hooks into the GTA app and provides Lua bindings for the in game script engine, one of the examples that come with it is an infinite health + ammo script.

And due to GTA's bad multiplayer design, you can play online with it running and never lose in deathmatch. But more importantly, this should allow for some interesting mods in future.

GTA IV is running great on my new rig. I upgraded to an AMD Phenom 9750 from an Athlon X2 3800+ and my game is so smooth. I've used various video card drivers with my 9600GT and I've found the best drivers to use are either the new 181.00 or the 180.87 driver.

Just got a copy of the game and done a few benchmarks:

None CommandLines:

Statistics

Average FPS: 44.39

Duration: 37.21 sec

CPU Usage: 47%

System memory usage: 65%

Video memory usage: 79%

Graphics Settings

Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (75 Hz)

Texture Quality: High

Render Quality: High

View Distance: 32

Detail Distance: 70

Hardware

Microsoft Windows XP Professional

Service Pack 3

Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

Video Driver version: 178.24

Audio Adapter: SB Live! 24-bit

Intel Pentium III Xeon processor

File ID: benchmark.cli

-novblank -norestriction -noprecache -nomemrestrict Commandlines:

Statistics

Average FPS: 46.04

Duration: 37.17 sec

CPU Usage: 47%

System memory usage: 69%

Video memory usage: 89%

Graphics Settings

Video Mode: 1024 x 768 (75 Hz)

Texture Quality: High

Render Quality: High

View Distance: 32

Detail Distance: 70

Hardware

Microsoft Windows XP Professional

Service Pack 3

Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

Video Driver version: 178.24

Audio Adapter: SB Live! 24-bit

Intel Pentium III Xeon processor

File ID: benchmark.cli

What's interesting is the CPU.

Only 50% CPU Usage and its reporting the wrong CPU, its meant to be Q9450 :s

Is is meant to be -norestriction or -norestrictions (with S on the end?)

Edited by SinghKing

I've added 4GB of RAM and OC'd my CPU and things are running smoothly at 30 FPS. I ran a benchmark and averaged 33 FPS.

Here are my current specs:

  • Intel? Core?2 Duo E6750 OC'd to 3.2 GHz (1600 FSB)
  • Windows Vista? Ultimate SP1 x64
  • 8GB DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz (2GBx4 DIMMs)
  • 640GB 7200RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s (32MB Cache)
  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB GDDR5

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!