GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

Planning to purchase a new PCI-Express, any suggestions between nVidia 9600 GT & ATI Radion 3870HDx2 that gives best result with GTA IV???

@Mystnight: little off topic but 13 GB wasted :o how did you managed to download it in 3 days? what tracker and connection were you using???

Planning to purchase a new PCI-Express, any suggestions between nVidia 9600 GT & ATI Radion 3870HDx2 that gives best result with GTA IV???

@Mystnight: little off topic but 13 GB wasted :o how did you managed to download it in 3 days? what tracker and connection were you using???

What tracker? lol, your too funny.

And people wonder why devs can't be arsed spending time to optimize games for the PC.

As said. There is no consistency with performance. If you can warrant the upgrade for something OTHER than GTA as well, the upgrade, but if it's just for GTA there's no guarantee that it will increase performance.

I wouldn't say that personally. The more power, the better the average frame rate (to a certain limit - other factors of course some into it), even in a same as inconsistant as GTA IV.

I wouldn't say that personally. The more power, the better the average frame rate (to a certain limit - other factors of course some into it), even in a same as inconsistant as GTA IV.

True. But, a lot of people are not getting the performance increase they would like from upgrading.

One person with a q6660 and a 8800GTX+ may get 40 fps, while another could be getting 20 with the exact same settings and set up. Sadly it is just a terrible port hence the inconsistency. Hell the game doesn't even detect most CPU's correctly, nor does it use the 4th core of a quad core.

Dear God!

i was really shocked when my friend told me the minimum/recommended requirements for this game.

his GTA IV arrived today, says its taking ages to install.

sounds like a really power hungry but excellent looking game!

It doesn't look that good, it's got some really bad texture flickering, and the shadows are terrible.

Planning to purchase a new PCI-Express, any suggestions between nVidia 9600 GT & ATI Radion 3870HDx2 that gives best result with GTA IV???

@Mystnight: little off topic but 13 GB wasted :o how did you managed to download it in 3 days? what tracker and connection were you using???

I downloaded it in 3hrs 15 minutes. Steam my friend! :)

Did Rockstar release a patch for the game?
On 13 December 2008, a patch for GTA IV was released to mixed opinions. Some users reported an improved experience, while the majority of users reported little to no difference. In some cases the patch introduced new problems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTA_IV#Critical_reception

What tracker? lol, your too funny.

And people wonder why devs can't be arsed spending time to optimize games for the PC.

Was just asking for fun not that I will go and download that insane amount of data on by 512kbps :(

I downloaded it in 3hrs 15 minutes. Steam my friend! :)

Thanx for the info about steam, let me check if I can register ;)

Ran a quick benchmark;

Average FPS: 60.27

CPU Usage: 35%

System Memory Usage: 47%

Video Memory Usage: 93%

Video Mode: 1920 x 1200

Texture Quality: High

Render Quality: Very High

View Distance: 32

Detail Distance: 100

Will have to toy around with it, see if I can do something about my GPU bottleneck

Ran a quick benchmark;

Average FPS: 60.27

CPU Usage: 35%

System Memory Usage: 47%

Video Memory Usage: 93%

Video Mode: 1920 x 1200

Texture Quality: High

Render Quality: Very High

View Distance: 32

Detail Distance: 100

Will have to toy around with it, see if I can do something about my GPU bottleneck

That is a marvellous performance dude. Which GPU have you got?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!