Iron Man 2 release date 7th May 2010


Recommended Posts

vur6i2dm6shs1dbxjok.jpg

Do I see a row of motherf*****g suits!

Apparently somehow he still has the Mark I. I'm thinking now he painted another version of the Mark II when he fought Obidiah. That can explain the non painted one. maybe?

Apparently somehow he still has the Mark I. I'm thinking now he painted another version of the Mark II when he fought Obidiah. That can explain the non painted one. maybe?

Yea it seems odd that he has the mark 1. I forgot but in the 1st movie the bro in the desert took it. Maybe "the dude" :laugh: took it with him when he made Iron Monger. The 4th suit is probably a repaired version of the mark 3 after his fight at the end. It got pretty beat up.

Also replacing Terrance does annoy me as Cheadle is a skinny little wimp, but I'll reserve judgement until I see the film. As much as I dislike replacements Maggie was better than Katie in Dark Knight.

Yea it seems odd that he has the mark 1. I forgot but in the 1st movie the bro in the desert took it. Maybe "the dude" :laugh: took it with him when he made Iron Monger. The 4th suit is probably a repaired version of the mark 3 after his fight at the end. It got pretty beat up.

I dunno.. from what I saw, the Mark I was pretty much in pieces. Then another question comes up. Tony 'suddenly' has the plans for Mark I in the cave? He keeps the designs with him whereever he goes? lol. Makes sense for the plans to be in the computer, but in a unknown cave? But even if the plans were with him, wouldn't the terrorists have gotten their hands on it already? lol. Plot Hole. :\

^You shouldn't think into detail that far with such movies :p I mean, it's a movie from a comic book. Such things can happen in comic books. As long as it "feels" right, it's not a problem.

@smooth3006: He hasn't had the need for the Hulk Buster yet so he obviously hasn't made it yet either.

On they'll be an explanation for the suits. For all we know the Mark 1 doesn't even operate is just for looks. They had it in pieces yea, but it was setup on display more or less "built"

Curious to see what they'd do for a hulk buster, but here's someone's attempt. Obviously the real one would look better :D

post-11142-1241367957_thumb.jpg

I dunno.. from what I saw, the Mark I was pretty much in pieces. Then another question comes up. Tony 'suddenly' has the plans for Mark I in the cave? He keeps the designs with him whereever he goes? lol. Makes sense for the plans to be in the computer, but in a unknown cave? But even if the plans were with him, wouldn't the terrorists have gotten their hands on it already? lol. Plot Hole. :\

He was there for 3 months he had time to draw the plans up in the cave after knowing what parts he had to work with on 3 sheets of paper that when apart just show parts of the suit and when put on top of each other show the full suit. It doesnt show what happens to the plans but he could have easily destroyed them before suiting up in the Mark 1 i dont think he would just leave something like that lying around.

If you remember obadiah put it in Sector 16 while he was building Iron Monger, Pepper and Agent Coulson even comment on the suit that they thought it was going to be bigger right before the Iron Monger appears. Tony could have easily taken what was there and rebuilt some of the parts from memory.

post-253434-1241369357_thumb.jpg

Edited by Richard Hammond
so Don Cheadle as an actor I like.. Him as Rhodey, I don't like... Just don't think he "fits" the part. Any word on the Sam Jackson deal? I mean is he still on as Fury?

Yeah he signed a 9 picture marvel deal a few months back.

^ Yea largest to date if I'm not mistaken. I really dislike Cheadle as the role. He'd be ok as Rhodey but we all know he turns into War Machine and that lil punk ain't no badass.

Looks like that was modeled on Juggernaut :rofl:

juggernaut-2.jpg

The original looked quite similar but yea it does, hopefully they won't give him such a large head :)

post-11142-1241375749_thumb.jpg

If you remember obadiah put it in Sector 16 while he was building Iron Monger, Pepper and Agent Coulson even comment on the suit that they thought it was going to be bigger right before the Iron Monger appears. Tony could have easily taken what was there and rebuilt some of the parts from memory.

post-253434-1241369357_thumb.jpg

That's the scene! I knew they had it somewhere. Part that annoys me in the picture they released is all the suits are powered on. The suit itself doesn't have a power source if I'm not mistaken? It plugs into Tony's?

vur6i2dm6shs1dbxjok.jpg

That's the scene! I knew they had it somewhere. Part that annoys me in the picture they released is all the suits are powered on. The suit itself doesn't have a power source if I'm not mistaken? It plugs into Tony's?

Eh, he could've just placed a light similar to his in each suit. Not that big of a deal.

^ Could just be the angle. I think it's just a more refined model. He doesn't seem to repair suits, if you remember in the first the suit at the end was badly damaged, on top of that, it had already gotten shot up just before he took it out.

Eh, he could've just placed a light similar to his in each suit. Not that big of a deal.

Yea I know but it seems silly. The point of the light was to show Stark is in there and it's powered on. The used the imagery of the power source flickering on/off a lot in the first. It's not a light switch :x

^So? It can still be turned on and off :p

I know this has been posted several times but here's a concept image from War Machine:

WarMachine-Concept.png

Click preview to view the original image.

This is where I've found it: Phil Saunders' Random Stuff. It's the blog from the person who made the concept art for the Iron Man suits + Tony Starks Mansion.

He posted this along with the images:

And for those of you speculating, sorry folks, as far as I know, if there is a War Machine in IM 2, it's unlikely to be this one. You'll just have to wait and see!

More concept stuff. Apparently, he also did some concept stuff for Spider-Man 3.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!