Iron Man 2 release date 7th May 2010


Recommended Posts

Rappy, I will ship a box to you very soon. Don't worry about its contents (it really won't matter), just make sure you open it where no one else is around, I certainly wouldn't want collateral damage.... :p

Rappy, I will ship a box to you very soon. Don't worry about its contents (it really won't matter), just make sure you open it where no one else is around, I certainly wouldn't want collateral damage.... :p

I like presents!...your saying if I open it I may not enjoy it :(

No, I'm implying that it won't matter if you enjoy it :shiftyninja:

I noticed you have Marvel in your xbox gamercard is that marvel alliance? if so I love that game but am stuck atm on the ice level with the giant ice creature lol

Ahh some of you guys are hero worshiping (and I guess this would be the right place for it). Don't get wrong. I like Samuel Jackson. I think he would be a good Fury. I still hope he is Fury.

However he has all of 60 secs actually playing him and not exactly in epic scenes. It is a bit early to say that only Jackson can play him. I have formed no attachment to Jackson as Fury based on those 60secs or so and I find it hard to believe that anyone has. There are many fine actors that could play Fury.

I noticed you have Marvel in your xbox gamercard is that marvel alliance? if so I love that game but am stuck atm on the ice level with the giant ice creature lol

Yes it is. I'm trying to max out the achievements. Are you playing the game on easy? If so, and you're stuck on that part, then um.... yeah, I'll send two packages then :p

Yes it is. I'm trying to max out the achievements. Are you playing the game on easy? If so, and you're stuck on that part, then um.... yeah, I'll send two packages then :p

Well yeah its on easy :shifty:

I think I picked the crap team tho.

Well yeah its on easy :shifty:

I think I picked the crap team tho.

What I did was used Johnny Storm (Human Torch) most of the time since he has strong attacks that can affect multiple enemies. Surround yourself with fire, launch your enemy in the air, then use his radial blast; you can do most of this while he is flying in the air, also works against enemies with shields. Luke Cage is good as well with his radial damage punch to the ground. If you happen to get the Hero/Villain pack, Hulk is great option as well as Dr. Doom, who I would've used all the time if I had bought the pack when I first started this game like eight months ago. He can protect himself with a field that blocks projectiles and damages enemies at the same time. Wolverine is a good one to use for melee damage, especially when you build his aggression up and have your tap A repeatedly prompt. There are some really, really sad characters in this game; Blade, Spider-Woman, Iceman and Elektra come to mind. My characters are passed level 70 since I've gone through it multiple times and beat it on Easy, Normal and Hard. C'mon Rappy, you can beat it on easy... :p

FYI - Jackson gave his consent for Nick Fury to be re-designed in his likeness.....the original Nick Fury was Caucasian, the Iron Man movie version of Nick Fury portrays the Nick Fury re-design from The Ultimates #1 (March 2002). If they stuck to the original Nick Fury, Jackson would have no business portraying Nick Fury.

I knew the original was white, didn't know the new one was designed to be like him though.

however he has all of 60 secs actually playing him and not exactly in epic scenes. It is a bit early to say that only Jackson can play him. I have formed no attachment to Jackson as Fury based on those 60secs or so and I find it hard to believe that anyone has. There are many fine actors that could play Fury.

Name some? Like mwpeck said the character was designed around him, no doubt has the traits to play the character, if you say there are so many, lets start naming some.

Emily Blunt rumored for 'Iron Man 2'

With Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell negotiating to play two key villains in "Iron Man 2," Marvel Entertainment and director Jon Favreau are now focusing on casting another nemesis for Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark: the femme fatale Black Widow.

Emily Blunt has emerged as the frontrunner to play the role of Natasha Romanoff in the "Iron Man" sequel. She's a Soviet super spy who doubles as Black Widow, a beauty in a skintight black costume that is enhanced by high-tech weaponry.

Blunt, whose recent credits include "The Devil Wears Prada," "The Jane Austen Book Club" and "Charlie Wilson's War," will get a profile boost when she stars with Benicio Del Toro in the Joe Johnston-directed "The Wolf Man" for Universal.

Marvel would not comment on the Black Widow casting. The Justin Theroux-scripted "Iron Man 2" will begin production this spring for release by Paramount in summer 2010.

Name some? Like mwpeck said the character was designed around him, no doubt has the traits to play the character, if you say there are so many, lets start naming some.

Only the Ultimate version was designed around him. The character goes back to 63'. As far as traits he pretty much just needs to have a hard edge, intelligent, and be believable as a military veteran. I think they are going to be using him as a mission commander so action sequences involving him should be limited. He probably does need to look fit however.

Off the top of my head and I'm sure I'm missing some obvious ones:

The current "ultimate" version: Andre Braugher, Erik King, Avery Brooks, Michael Dorn, Laurence Fishburne, Denzel Washington, Forrest Whitaker (if he can make weight), Will Smith (maybe).

Classic version: DeNiro, Kevin Spacey, Viggo Mortensen, Jude Law (playing against his image), Tommy Lee Jones, Ed Harris, George Clooney, Jeremy Irons, Daniel Day-Lewis, Clive Owen, Daniel Craig.

Okay and to be clear I still like Samuel Jackson. He is my first choice. His availability just does not make or break the character much less a movie for me. And neither of us know how good or bad he might be in the role based on the very little we have seen.

I respectfully disagree with most, DeNiro would be a terrible pick, Clooney, Tommy Lee, Denzel, and Smith too.

Andre might be alright, but he's already Fantastic Four's military guy ;) Erik King, gets on my nerves, at least his Dexter character did. Brooks and Fishburne, would be good, but they seem too "professional" for the role. Ed Harris or Jeremy Irons would be good for the classic version. They have the right amount of attitude and professionalism.

I still think Samuel would be the best choice, he's athletic, has attitude, and demands respect/authority. Based on the footage seen I agree, but I'm basing it around who he is, and previous roles. When I think of the character being played by anyone else it seems "wrong" to me, like trying to jam that puzzle piece that doesn't fit into that corner spot.

Name some? Like mwpeck said the character was designed around him, no doubt has the traits to play the character, if you say there are so many, lets start naming some.

Watching BSG tonight and one hit me. Michael Hogan; he already owns the uniform and eyepatch. Sew on some different patches and add some fabric dye.

  • 3 weeks later...

Mickey Rourke isn't Crimson Dynamo but he might be Whiplash?

?That?s actually incorrect,? Downey told MTV News when asked if Rourke was being considered for the aforementioned Iron Man rogue. When pressed if, instead of Crimson Dynamo, Rourke was up for the role of Whiplash, another potential role bandied about on blogs these days, Downey had a more cryptic response.

?I can neither confirm nor deny that,? said Downey. ?Or maybe it?s some semblance of both. Here, I can tell you everything about the story except I won?t give away the ending. The nerd stuff is top-drawer security.?

News of Rourke?s possible involvement with the follow-up to last summer?s mega-blockbuster has been one of the biggest stories to hit the ?Tubes lately. After reports broke that the actor, who is currently going through a career renaissance of sorts, was being considered for ?Iron Man 2″ (but has not officially signed on to the project as of yet), he went as far as saying that he?d bring ?everything I can bring? to ?Iron Man 2″ in a brief chat with MTV News.

--

Iron 2 Game Announced

SEGA? of America, Inc. and SEGA of Europe Ltd today announced a continuation of their existing partnership with Marvel Entertainment, Inc. to include "Iron Man 2?," the video game. The multi-platform title is slated to come out in 2010 along with the Marvel Studios film of the same name, a sequel to the 2008 box office triumph distributed by Paramount Pictures.

"We are thrilled to build on the success of the 'Iron Man' phenomenon and work with Marvel and Paramount on another epic project," says Simon Jeffery, President of SEGA of America, Inc. "SEGA and Marvel are collaborating closely to ensure we deliver an authentic 'Iron Man' experience."

The game is currently in production at SEGA Studios San Francisco. SEGA has continued to refine its game engine so that players can expect an entirely new and enhanced gameplay experience. Stay tuned for more information about "Iron Man 2," the video game.

  • 2 weeks later...
Eliza Dushku appeared on the Howard Stern Show on Sirius/XM Radio this morning to promote her new television show Dollhouse. Things got interesting when the topic of conversation went to Robert Downey Jr and Iron Man. Dushku explained that she would love to play The Black Widow in Iron Man 2.

?They?re doing Iron Man 2, and I?m so perfect for the Black Widow character, that they just need to get into it. They need to understand? I just learned Russian because I had to play a Russian girl in Dollhouse.?se.?

I get the impression from the way she just brought it up that she?s already either put her name in for the part or possibly even auditioned for the role. Emily Blunt was awarded the role but 20th Century Fox has an option on the actress and the studio wants her to play the romantic lead in Gulliver?s Travels. Last we heard the two production schedules were conflicting and Blunt might be forced to give up the role. And if that happens, Marvel will need a new Black Widow. Eliza went to give a plea to the audience to convince Marvel Studios to give her a chance.

m:)m, yes please :)

Scarlett Johansson to Replace Emily Blunt as Black Widow in Iron Man 2?

A couple weeks ago it was revealed that Emily Blunt might have to step down from playing Black Widow in Iron Man 2 due a schedule conflict with Gulliver?s Travels. Since then Eliza Dushku tossed her hat into the consideration pool, pleading fans to start a campaign to make it happen. Unfortunately for Eliza, it seems that Jon Favreau and Marvel have bigger names in mind for the part.

EW has learned that Scarlett Johansson is in talks to replace Blunt as Russian superspy Natasha Romanoff (aka the Black Widow). Johansson has apparently met with the filmmakers and is interested in the part, and is just waiting for Blunt to officially give up the part. Blunt?s reps are still trying to make the schedules fall into alignment but Iron Man still doesn?t have a schedule or start date in place.

Aside from being sexy and a big name you can slap on the poster, Johansson doesn?t seem right for the part at all. She?s cute but not dangerous. Plus lets not forget, the last superhero film she was in, The Spirit, was just bad and was considered a bomb on every level (not that it was at all her fault? we know who to blame).

Mickey Rourke Not Doing Iron Man 2?

Mickey Rourke has told New York Magazine that it's looking like he won't be playing the villain in Iron Man 2:

But so what if ICM's David Unger doesn't look good in a dress ? at least he's battling Marvel for a bigger paycheck for Rourke for his rumored role as a villain in Iron Man 2, right? "Right now, we're not doing Iron Man 2," Rourke told us grimly.

In January, the news broke that Marvel had offered the award-winning "Wrestler" star just $250,000 to play a villain in the sequel. Perhaps further negotiations didn't go so well? Also, Rourke is now firmly attached to star in Sylvester Stallone's The Expendables, which starts shooting shortly and might interfere with the Iron Man 2 shoot.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!