Recommended Posts

you mean grandma and her bifocals :p

i wish firefox's jump list was more like ie8 though with the bookmarks and all...guess ya cant have the best of both worlds in a pre-beta though

Well... That's because the coding for jump lists isn't done in Windows itself. Every program has to be coded to support it. Firefox obviously doesn't have any code yet, as there are no SDK's released yet.

One of the PDC videos has a quite nice coding demo on all the superbar features.

And with everyone calling it superbar I guess Microsoft will have to rename it :happy:

I must say this version is not quite as good for window switching as the classic taskbar was.

The missing bits:

  • No aero peek
  • Has the old jump list arrow instead of rightclicking
  • Old startbutton
  • No jump lists in start menu
  • No window titles in the thumbnails

And the fact that thumbnails don't show up as fast as I expected make this one not that suitable. Might be the reason why they disabled this by default.

Are there pics comparing the two start buttons? I saw the PDC video but I couldn't see anything significant :wacko:

Are there pics comparing the two start buttons? I saw the PDC video but I couldn't see anything significant :wacko:

It's just a different glow effect.

The 6801 button just has a blue glow, the new button has something that features some sort of 'sun ray' around the startbutton in the 4 windows flag colors, something like the eclipse ring effect but then 4 times.

** edit: found images

6801: post-151800-1225679812.png

6933: post-151800-1225679817.png

(the 6933 image is actually when it's pressed but it looks almost the same at hover)

The 6933 glow effect is less obtrusive and doesn't take away all your focus like the 6801 kinda does for me...

bit offtopic but worth the post...seems like mikey is wanting our input on 7even http://www.windows7taskforce.com

It's just a different glow effect.

The 6801 button just has a blue glow, the new button has something that features some sort of 'sun ray' around the startbutton in the 4 windows flag colors, something like the eclipse ring effect but then 4 times.

** edit: found images

6801: post-151800-1225679812.png

6933: post-151800-1225679817.png

(the 6933 image is actually when it's pressed but it looks almost the same at hover)

The 6933 glow effect is less obtrusive and doesn't take away all your focus like the 6801 kinda does for me...

i think i actually like 6801's button better

Any specific reasons?

brighter..more catchy i think..speaking of catchy..anyone think that the sensetivity of the new start button is less than that of vista...seems like it takes a lil more precision to hit the right spot

seems the new superbar is not as bad though.....might just be the padding on the regular bar

Too bad Aero Peek's non functional. Otherwise, I still like this better than the old Vista style taskbar. (Y)

Now excuse me while I go play around with the glow effects like this:

superbar looks a helluva lot better docked on the right or left side than the regular bar does imo...whatda you guys think?

is it me or is the windows logo missing from the windows logo screensaver in this build?

Superbar definitely looks ten times better than the fat-text taskbar on the sides.

The Windows Logo screensaver has both the Windows 7 logo, and the Vista swoosh that should be dropped any time soon :p

edit: Try copying a file. The progress bar animation's there :D

post-99705-1225682161.png

After doing this unlock you'll also uncover a fade transition for the programs list and search results in the Start Menu.

Edited by rm20010
It's just a different glow effect.

The 6801 button just has a blue glow, the new button has something that features some sort of 'sun ray' around the startbutton in the 4 windows flag colors, something like the eclipse ring effect but then 4 times.

** edit: found images

6801: post-151800-1225679812.png

6933: post-151800-1225679817.png

(the 6933 image is actually when it's pressed but it looks almost the same at hover)

The 6933 glow effect is less obtrusive and doesn't take away all your focus like the 6801 kinda does for me...

Quick reply :)

Thanks, I see the difference. Yes, I do like the build 6933 glow better. It sort of reminds me of vista's startup animation.

And what's the eclipse ring effect? :pinch:

Superbar definitely looks ten times better than the fat-text taskbar on the sides.

The Windows Logo screensaver has both the Windows 7 logo, and the Vista swoosh that should be dropped any time soon :p

edit: Try copying a file. The progress bar animation's there :D

post-99705-1225682161.png

After doing this unlock you'll also uncover a fade transition for the programs list and search results in the Start Menu.

Can you give me a step by step way of enabling this please?

Edit: ^^Is the bar dynamic (narrower with no text and wider automatically when text is showing)? And how does it look better than the fat-text taskbar? :ermm:

Superbar definitely looks ten times better than the fat-text taskbar on the sides.

The Windows Logo screensaver has both the Windows 7 logo, and the Vista swoosh that should be dropped any time soon :p

edit: Try copying a file. The progress bar animation's there :D

post-99705-1225682161.png

After doing this unlock you'll also uncover a fade transition for the programs list and search results in the Start Menu.

Can you close programs by clicking the X-button in the thumbnail?

Can you advise what file and where please?

Just copy and paste a very large file, like >300 MB or so. Or copy a lot of files, say your entire Documents folder.

Can you close programs by clicking the X-button in the thumbnail?

Yep. You can also middle click on window thumbnails to close. :)

Edit: ^^Is the bar dynamic (narrower with no text and wider automatically when text is showing)? And how does it look better than the fat-text taskbar? :ermm:

Can you close programs by clicking the X-button in the thumbnail?

yes, you can close programs by clicking the X-button in the thumbnail.

Edit: ^^Is the bar dynamic (narrower with no text and wider automatically when text is showing)? And how does it look better than the fat-text taskbar? :ermm:

It's not dynamic if text labels are showing. You can freely resize the bars if the superbar's unlocked.

Well... the text-label-less bar looks better than previous taskbar incarnations in Windows. :p

Yep. You can also middle click on window thumbnails to close. :)

Nice! :woot: for the middle click! Just like IE/FF/whatever browser :cool:

I like :)

It's not dynamic if text labels are showing. You can freely resize the bars if the superbar's unlocked.

Well... the text-label-less bar looks better than previous taskbar incarnations in Windows. :p

I guess :D

And what bars are those? The app buttons?

(sorry for all these questions :pinch: )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!