Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2009 receives the Gold Malware Treatment Award


Recommended Posts

I have NOD32 setup on my parents computer, with under 512MB of RAM, I can't afford to install anything that is going to hog alot of resources. I've been buying NOD32 for a few years now. But it looks like now is the time to switch to Kaspersky!

How big of a resource hog is Kaspersky in comparison with NOD32?

I have NOD32 setup on my parents computer, with under 512MB of RAM, I can't afford to install anything that is going to hog alot of resources. I've been buying NOD32 for a few years now. But it looks like now is the time to switch to Kaspersky!

How big of a resource hog is Kaspersky in comparison with NOD32?

Avast scored just as well as Kaspersy and its free and much more light weight than Kaspersky too.

Pity the new Comodo Antivirus wasn't tested, it would have been interesting to see where it fitted in with the competition.

I tested Comodo myself, with some malware. Out of 15 samples it detected 3 if I remember correctly.

It's a really poor antivirus, then again - it is free.

I downloaded this and gave it a try...What a joke, it may protect like they say but it's such a system hog. NOD FTW!

Rubbish. The only joke here is NOD32, with extremely poor Malware protection and next to no ability to remove any malware it finds.

It's hard to believe NOD32 would fail so miserably.

NOD doesn't have any self-protection on XP, so any viruses designed to disable AV products can kill it*. Anyway, I'm more concerned with how an AV detects malware before it's executed, rather than cleaning an already infected machine, and NOD does this well.

*I'm not sure how many of the 15 viruses used in this test have that functionality.

I am wondering if NOD32 comes with heuristic, adware/spyware/riskware, potentially unwanted applications, and potentially unsafe applications enabled by default. This *might* be why NOD32 got 0/15, which would be ridiculous. It is been a long time, so I don't remember if I enabled them manually or not.

In v3, detection of potentially unsafe apps is disabled by default, and detection of possibly unwanted apps is a user-selected option during install. (I'm going from memory here, but I think that's right)

Edited by jmc777
Kaspersky seems kind of expensive. How much does a renewal run you.. I can't seem to find it on their website.

Actually Avast scored just as well as Kaspersky and you can get that one for free!!

The one thing about nod, is they say you have to buy 2 license to install it on 2 computer, but if you install it on 2 computers with just 1 license and use the same user name pass on both, it works :|

Kaspersky Internet Security 1-year 3-pc licenses only cost me $20 CAD incl. tax. because it always goes on sale at one time or another during the year at one retail store or another. Since the key lasts one year from the time you activate, I just buy a copy for the following year when there's a sale. So...not very expensive at all.

Avast scored just as well as Kaspersy and its free and much more light weight than Kaspersky too.

I'll give that a try tonight, maybe free is the best solution? From what I've heard AVG is what most schools tend to use, so its definitely a well established product.

I tested Comodo myself, with some malware. Out of 15 samples it detected 3 if I remember correctly.

It's a really poor antivirus, then again - it is free.

Rubbish. The only joke here is NOD32, with extremely poor Malware protection and next to no ability to remove any malware it finds.

You're right, Nod32 miss LOT of "Trojan.Vundo.H". I download Malwarebytes, it's catch them 100% of them! Im happy with it!

I change to Kaspersky from Nod32 v3.

Cool, I'm glad I made the right choice by switching from Mcafee to Kaspersky :)

well, it somehow tested McAfee 2008 against Kaspersky 2009, while McAfee 2009 has already been out.

Dr.Web Anti-Virus <--------- :huh: this took top spot ? where did this come from

from Russia, supposedly the AV used by the Russian government military. When an antivirus is the choice of its local government, I usually don't trust it ;)

You're right, Nod32 miss LOT of "Trojan.Vundo.H". I download Malwarebytes, it's catch them 100% of them! Im happy with it!

I change to Kaspersky from Nod32 v3.

You won't regret it (Y)

What I did was look for malware. Downloaded it then ran it past NOD32 - about 60% detected but strangely not a single piece of malware removed. :laugh: Then I scanned the malwares with Kaspersky, detected all but 1 and swiftly removed them. The one malware it missed, I quarantined. Sent to Kaspersky and 40minutes later, an email with a thankyou and detection. Try and get any of that from Eset. You are likely to be waiting forever and detection may never happen or two weeks after the submission, with zero replies from ESET. ESET, never again.

well, it somehow tested McAfee 2008 against Kaspersky 2009, while McAfee 2009 has already been out.

I've never used mcafee 2009, how does it compare with 2008? I moved from Mcafee 2008 to KIS 2009 when my Mcafee ran out just before Mcafee 2009 released.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Not found" - this is what you get when you embed a tweet instead of just taking a screenshot.
    • Wonder if they will let you go into an Apple Store and have your white glass back swapped for a silver one, will they refuse even if you pay?
    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      53
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!