New to Vista ...


Recommended Posts

Is it running slow? Vista does do things in the background to speed up your computer, like index your documents and cache often-used programs so they load quickly. Also, make sure you're running Service Pack 1 - performance is measurably better.

If you're the type to turn your computer off immediately after using it, consider leaving it on occasionally overnight, so Vista can do the tasks it does when it's idle.

Also, if you bought your computer with Vista preinstalled, uninstall all the garbage that comes with it. I recommend using this tool to automatically remove most of the junk.

If you have any version of Norton before 2009, or McAfee, or Zonealarm, that might also be a cause of sluggish performance.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590144810
Share on other sites

Is it running slow? Vista does do things in the background to speed up your computer, like index your documents and cache often-used programs so they load quickly. Also, make sure you're running Service Pack 1 - performance is measurably better.

If you're the type to turn your computer off immediately after using it, consider leaving it on occasionally overnight, so Vista can do the tasks it does when it's idle.

Also, if you bought your computer with Vista preinstalled, uninstall all the garbage that comes with it. I recommend using this tool to automatically remove most of the junk.

If you have any version of Norton before 2009, or McAfee, or Zonealarm, that might also be a cause of sluggish performance.

ok thanks i`ll try and see what will happened .

You can turn off the indexing service, if you dont need it.

already done that but still something going on

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590149138
Share on other sites

Task Manager > Performance (Tab) > Resource Monitor. See what's using the disk.

Let the system settle down, it gets faster as it gets used to your usage patterns...unless you've disabled its adaptive abilities by running harmful tweaks.

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

4GB RAM

150GB WD

nforce 2 chipset

nvidia Geforce 9800 VC

and yes, i was running SP1...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590149174
Share on other sites

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

4GB RAM

150GB WD

nforce 2 chipset

nvidia Geforce 9800 VC

and yes, i was running SP1...

Are you serious? The nforce2 was never even supported by Nvidia for Vista. It is NOT a machine that anyone should even try to run Vista on, even with 4GB of ram. Your machine is flat out UNSUPPORTED and this explains your poor performance.

Nobody is drinking kool-aid here. You were the one drinking it if you thought running an aincent platform was suitable for Vista. Your hardware isn't "crap," but it is many years old and lacks the proper drivers for Vista to run. You should have never tried using it in the first place and didn't do enough research to ensure your upgrade work work smoothly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590150000
Share on other sites

Intel Q6600

4GB 2 x 2GB Kingstom hyper X

P5Q

ATI 4850

WD 640 GB

@Relativity_17: what harmful tweaks ??

Windows Vista should be running well with your hardware. I have similar specs with a hard drive that needs to be defragmented and Windows Vista still runs smoothly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590150040
Share on other sites

Intel Q6600

4GB 2 x 2GB Kingstom hyper X

P5Q

ATI 4850

WD 640 GB

@Relativity_17: what harmful tweaks ??

This is a general outline of some of the most common ones that apply to both XP and Vista.

http://lifehacker.com/5033518/debunking-co...-tweaking-myths

SuperFetch really does help speed things up over time, but you'll notice that your hard drive will really crank after every fresh boot, as it loads commonly used files into your unused RAM. The TCP/IP hack is also a joke surrounded by fanatics.

There is this...odd idea, shared among some self-professed tweaking experts, that Microsoft has for some inexplicable (or nefarious reason) toggled some settings that cripple the performance of Windows, and that by finding and flipping these bits, you really can boost your performance to some imaginary full potential. The tiny grain of truth in this notion is that due to the wide array of hardware that Windows is expected to support, there are rare cases in which tweaking default settings will boost performance on specific and unusual hardware configurations. If you're running hardware manufactured in this decade, that wasn't bought from a Chinese merchant in a dark alley somewhere with an oddly familiar (but not quite right) name like Gigabite or Azus, you should be fine with a fresh default installation of Vista.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

Oh boy, you've really discovered our secret. Everyone who has had good experiences with Vista is in fact, lying to you. Better yet, we're all a Billy G/Steve Ballmer hybrid (Bill Gallmer?), trying to promote Vista and increase our (my) collective post count on Neowin. Better hide under your bed, the black helicopters are on their way. :rofl:

Edited by Relativity_17
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590150542
Share on other sites

already done that but still something going on

that's your problem (or part of it anyways). don't ever listen to people who tell you to stop the indexing service. they're usually total idiots. the service takes a bit of resources initially to index your system, but once it's done it helps your system run so much better. also, go and edit the locations that it index, and make it not index useless folders like %programfiles% and %appdata%, etc.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590158814
Share on other sites

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

4GB RAM

150GB WD

nforce 2 chipset

nvidia Geforce 9800 VC

and yes, i was running SP1...

Problem solved. You look smart.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590158832
Share on other sites

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

You're better off getting used to it and learning how it works. Windows 7 is based on it, unless you stubbornly plan to stick with XP forever of course.

Personally I disable the Windows Desktop Search (I've no real need for it) and Windows Defender (I use something else). I've left most other ones on, as they're useful.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590160562
Share on other sites

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

4GB RAM

150GB WD

nforce 2 chipset

nvidia Geforce 9800 VC

and yes, i was running SP1...

LOLS, move along.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590166704
Share on other sites

Vista is garbage, get rid of it. I for one got tired of waiting for my PC to "settle down", performance never improved for me.

for all you Vista Kool-Aid drinkers who are gonna say my HW was crap:

4GB RAM

150GB WD

nforce 2 chipset

nvidia Geforce 9800 VC

and yes, i was running SP1...

fail.

don't blame crap on vista that isn't the fault of vista. Nvidia has no support at all for nforce 2 in vista therein lies your problem. Nvidia not supporting their chipset in vista, it is not vista...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590177268
Share on other sites

Hey man, as a lot of people have mentioned Vista does things in the background to make your user experience on the hole much better.

I have a very similar spec to you and the main reason for Vista being slow was that the Quad Core Intel Processors wearnt supported by the P5Q Series Motherboards properly until the most recent BIOS update. There is a whole lot of hate you can go read on the ASUS forums, after updating that and making sure all the Driver updates were in order my system quickly picked up speed.

Remember, Windows XP was designed to SAVE memory, which is a very backward way of thinking. Windows Vista on the other hand is designed to USE memory, which makes a lot more sense, it's there, why not use it? So that would explain the hard drive thrashing you're probably seeing after bootup.

Just thought i'd jump in and say LMFAO, nForce2, that's the definition of FAIL! What are you running dude? Windows 2000? Windows 98? LMAO.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590180524
Share on other sites

Hey man, as a lot of people have mentioned Vista does things in the background to make your user experience on the hole much better.

I have a very similar spec to you and the main reason for Vista being slow was that the Quad Core Intel Processors wearnt supported by the P5Q Series Motherboards properly until the most recent BIOS update. There is a whole lot of hate you can go read on the ASUS forums, after updating that and making sure all the Driver updates were in order my system quickly picked up speed.

Remember, Windows XP was designed to SAVE memory, which is a very backward way of thinking. Windows Vista on the other hand is designed to USE memory, which makes a lot more sense, it's there, why not use it? So that would explain the hard drive thrashing you're probably seeing after bootup.

Just thought i'd jump in and say LMFAO, nForce2, that's the definition of FAIL! What are you running dude? Windows 2000? Windows 98? LMAO.

so i have to update my BIOS ? if so can u tell me how cause i don`t know how to update it ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590186690
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have another question regarding folder Views , i want Vista to remember my settings for viewing folders for all of them .

i know that i can do this by going to the view tab and click apply to all folders but it seems that something is wrong cause after i made this step i found that some folder do remember and some not , so how can i do it properly ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/698522-new-to-vista/#findComment-590238048
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!