Does the PS3 really eat up a lot of energy?


Recommended Posts

No, nothing alarming on my electricity bill since I bought the console. And FTR I actually own all 3 consoles, and have a PC constantly running :p

Doubt it eats up any more than a mid-high end PC.

Yes the reports are true, but unless your console is on 24/7, 365 days a year, nothing to worry about, it's not really any different than any other high end multimedia device.

New revisions of the device will continue to use less as the CPU/GPU inside are shrunk.

how about someone at neowin run some quick tests w/ their killawatt meter?

measure in Standby, idle and while playing a game.

i heard that it still uses like 30W in Standby. true or false? :unsure:

edit: ok, nevermind... this review shows 1.9W in Standby

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-356-1.htm

but what a hog when idle/playback/gaming :|

Edited by Jdawg683
how about someone at neowin run some quick tests w/ their killawatt meter?

measure in Standby, idle and while playing a game.

i heard that it still uses like 30W in Standby. true or false? :unsure:

No idea :blink:

Think the old PS3 (90nm/90nm) is rated at 200W, first revision (65nm/90nm) 135W and the newest one which I believe is (65nm/65nm) I don't have a figure for.

( Source: http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/30/40gb-ps...er-consumption/ )

Those won't be standby figures, just what it's rated at.

just for casual fun times . i dont think i will worry about PS3, i sure did worry when get Sony bravia plasmas got 26" seeing the viewing area will be small and will result is decent power usage, its almost ON for 10-14 hours daily in total usage by all members in my home, PS3 is just used by me and my sis once in a while for some hours and that too not everyday but now and then :)

New revisions of the device will continue to use less as the CPU/GPU inside are shrunk.

But you'll have to buy the new revised device(s) in order to take advantage of the lesser power consumption.

Microsoft Xbox 360 ranks a close second. If you shut it down when you're not playing a game or watching a movie, it costs about $11 to operate annually. Leaving it on continuously will cost you $103.

Yey, a reason to choose the 360 over the PS3! :D

$12 a yr?

Terrible!

That's almost the cost of...2 sandwiches!

But you'll have to buy the new revised device(s) in order to take advantage of the lesser power consumption.

Yey, a reason to choose the 360 over the PS3! :D

Yup $12 a year, definitely worth basing your console purchase(s) on that :rofl:

Good point, lol. But it's interesting to see that the Wii uses A LOT LESS power than the 360 and PS3.

Pretty simple, last generation hardware, last generation power usage.

Not interesting or surprising in the least!

yes. BIG plasmas LCD can simply EAT lots of power . they look slick and slim but they are monsters.

infact australia is thinking of banning them outright.

http://techdirt.com/articles/20071010/171139.shtml http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/10/2055587.htm

This is the reason i took very late decision to get Sony Bravia and i knew they optimize consumption on updated/revised versions . same about PS3 40 gb i knew by removing PS2 hardware and more updated power hardware they have now brought down consumption and 26 inch was wise choice , i got another reason to get bean bag and move it around when playing :) .

  • 1 month later...

hey,

My wife and i have our PS3, (witch we use every night) Tv and Home theather on a surge protecter and that you can switch off anytime( surge protecter) and it draws no power at all, last month my bill will like $60 with the all my Appliance Eletric, meaning no gas. My water gets heated by electic, also have my internet connected that way too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!