Does the PS3 really eat up a lot of energy?


Recommended Posts

No, nothing alarming on my electricity bill since I bought the console. And FTR I actually own all 3 consoles, and have a PC constantly running :p

Doubt it eats up any more than a mid-high end PC.

Yes the reports are true, but unless your console is on 24/7, 365 days a year, nothing to worry about, it's not really any different than any other high end multimedia device.

New revisions of the device will continue to use less as the CPU/GPU inside are shrunk.

how about someone at neowin run some quick tests w/ their killawatt meter?

measure in Standby, idle and while playing a game.

i heard that it still uses like 30W in Standby. true or false? :unsure:

edit: ok, nevermind... this review shows 1.9W in Standby

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-356-1.htm

but what a hog when idle/playback/gaming :|

Edited by Jdawg683
how about someone at neowin run some quick tests w/ their killawatt meter?

measure in Standby, idle and while playing a game.

i heard that it still uses like 30W in Standby. true or false? :unsure:

No idea :blink:

Think the old PS3 (90nm/90nm) is rated at 200W, first revision (65nm/90nm) 135W and the newest one which I believe is (65nm/65nm) I don't have a figure for.

( Source: http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/30/40gb-ps...er-consumption/ )

Those won't be standby figures, just what it's rated at.

just for casual fun times . i dont think i will worry about PS3, i sure did worry when get Sony bravia plasmas got 26" seeing the viewing area will be small and will result is decent power usage, its almost ON for 10-14 hours daily in total usage by all members in my home, PS3 is just used by me and my sis once in a while for some hours and that too not everyday but now and then :)

New revisions of the device will continue to use less as the CPU/GPU inside are shrunk.

But you'll have to buy the new revised device(s) in order to take advantage of the lesser power consumption.

Microsoft Xbox 360 ranks a close second. If you shut it down when you're not playing a game or watching a movie, it costs about $11 to operate annually. Leaving it on continuously will cost you $103.

Yey, a reason to choose the 360 over the PS3! :D

$12 a yr?

Terrible!

That's almost the cost of...2 sandwiches!

But you'll have to buy the new revised device(s) in order to take advantage of the lesser power consumption.

Yey, a reason to choose the 360 over the PS3! :D

Yup $12 a year, definitely worth basing your console purchase(s) on that :rofl:

Good point, lol. But it's interesting to see that the Wii uses A LOT LESS power than the 360 and PS3.

Pretty simple, last generation hardware, last generation power usage.

Not interesting or surprising in the least!

yes. BIG plasmas LCD can simply EAT lots of power . they look slick and slim but they are monsters.

infact australia is thinking of banning them outright.

http://techdirt.com/articles/20071010/171139.shtml http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/10/2055587.htm

This is the reason i took very late decision to get Sony Bravia and i knew they optimize consumption on updated/revised versions . same about PS3 40 gb i knew by removing PS2 hardware and more updated power hardware they have now brought down consumption and 26 inch was wise choice , i got another reason to get bean bag and move it around when playing :) .

  • 1 month later...

hey,

My wife and i have our PS3, (witch we use every night) Tv and Home theather on a surge protecter and that you can switch off anytime( surge protecter) and it draws no power at all, last month my bill will like $60 with the all my Appliance Eletric, meaning no gas. My water gets heated by electic, also have my internet connected that way too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!