Windows Server 2008 - Error Code 0x80070035


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am getting the following error when I try to access any share/computer on the network from my Windows Server 2008 DC+DHCP.

Network Error 
Windows cannot access \\ShareServer\Share
Error code: 0x80070035 
The network path was not found.

However, I can access the DC from any other computer on the network. I have already checked the Microsoft KB and found a hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958285#top). But not all of the symptoms given there apply to my situation.

I am also running couple of Virtual machines using MS Hyper-V which are bound to the one single NIC. And for some reason I cannot enable the Client for Microsoft Networks component on the properties of the NIC. It always gives me "Your current selection will also disable the following features: Client for Microsoft Networks" message whenever I try to enable it.

Any solutions or workarounds are welcomed... Thanks...

  -ANiMaL- said:
Hi,

I am getting the following error when I try to access any share/computer on the network from my Windows Server 2008 DC+DHCP.

Network Error 
Windows cannot access \\ShareServer\Share
Error code: 0x80070035 
The network path was not found.

However, I can access the DC from any other computer on the network. I have already checked the Microsoft KB and found a hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958285#top). But not all of the symptoms given there apply to my situation.

I am also running couple of Virtual machines using MS Hyper-V which are bound to the one single NIC. And for some reason I cannot enable the Client for Microsoft Networks component on the properties of the NIC. It always gives me "Your current selection will also disable the following features: Client for Microsoft Networks" message whenever I try to enable it.

Any solutions or workarounds are welcomed... Thanks...

Can you ping the server?

open a command prompt and do: net view \\ipofserver

I would suggest you just disable IPv6 on the client.. Which is the listed workaround in the KB article you linked too.

To work around this issue, restart the computer or disable the IPv6 feature.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929852

How to disable certain Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) components in Windows Vista

Budman:

The client side was never been the problem. The problem is appearing at "a" DC when ever I try to connect to another \\<machine name/ip>. From what I believe now is some issue with Client for Microsoft Network component, which for some reason I cannot enable (Checkout the screen grab).

However, I can enable it if I have also selected IPv6. Maybe there is a service that is bond to IPv6 or something.

Reboot:

Following are the NET VIEW outputs from the server itself & from a client.

  Quote
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]

Copyright © 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Administrator.##########>net view \\10.0.0.2

Shared resources at \\10.0.0.2

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NETLOGON Disk Logon server share

SYSVOL Disk Logon server share

The command completed successfully.

  Quote
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>net view \\10.0.0.2

Shared resources at \\10.0.0.2

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NETLOGON Disk Logon server share

SYSVOL Disk Logon server share

The command completed successfully.

post-32221-1228130274_thumb.jpg

There is no reason to have IPv6 enabled -- unless you were going to be actively using it.

So this DC has multiple nics? The NC373i is a dual embedded it it not - do you have them teamed? In what mode? Failover, loadbalancing?

Or are you running it multihomed? If so what are the networks your connected to, or the multiple IPs you have?

You can access shares by IP. If you can not find them by name -- do you have netbios enabled?

I guess that you are able to access the shares from a different computer, because from the output of the net view command it looks like there are no shares.

Best to check that the shares exist and test them locally and then from another workstation.

Then try it from the DC itself.

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for this delayed post, but I have been busy with the deployment plus we had a week holidays to slow things down. Now back to discussion in hand.

I can access any share on the DC via IP addr. & network name. I have no problems from any Clients connecting to the Server. The problem is from Server to any network share. Without IPv6 selected I do not get to enable Client for Microsoft Network. Which is Very Weird.

I do have multiple NIC connection but only one of them have IPv4 enabled & actively in use. Other NIC is active but it is being used by Hyper-V Virtual Machine.

However, I have IPv6 & Client for MS Net enabled for over 2 weeks now & everything seems to be working properly.

  -ANiMaL- said:
Sorry for this delayed post, but I have been busy with the deployment plus we had a week holidays to slow things down. Now back to discussion in hand.

I can access any share on the DC via IP addr. & network name. I have no problems from any Clients connecting to the Server. The problem is from Server to any network share. Without IPv6 selected I do not get to enable Client for Microsoft Network. Which is Very Weird.

I do have multiple NIC connection but only one of them have IPv4 enabled & actively in use. Other NIC is active but it is being used by Hyper-V Virtual Machine.

However, I have IPv6 & Client for MS Net enabled for over 2 weeks now & everything seems to be working properly.

How are you trying to access the clients? FQDN or IP? Via network Places perhaps? If you are running a DC, you have DNS. Are clients properly registering in DNS?

Both ways. Using windows explorer.

Yes, I'm running DNS and yes it is configured properly not just for clients & servers but also for other applications :)

Just to remind you that I have 11 servers in my data center & I am facing no problem except just this one with just this server. & This problem goes away if I enable IPv6.

Some of my friends are sugesting that there might be a corrupted reg. entry which is causing this to happen. But I do not want to take any action that may compromise the server. Plus I am going to drop Microsoft support an email & see what do they suggest.

As for u guyz I just want to thank you guyz 4 ur support & time :yes:

  • 4 months later...
  -ANiMaL- said:
Hi,

I am getting the following error when I try to access any share/computer on the network from my Windows Server 2008 DC+DHCP.

Network Error 
Windows cannot access \\ShareServer\Share
Error code: 0x80070035 
The network path was not found.

However, I can access the DC from any other computer on the network. I have already checked the Microsoft KB and found a hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958285#top). But not all of the symptoms given there apply to my situation.

I am also running couple of Virtual machines using MS Hyper-V which are bound to the one single NIC. And for some reason I cannot enable the Client for Microsoft Networks component on the properties of the NIC. It always gives me "Your current selection will also disable the following features: Client for Microsoft Networks" message whenever I try to enable it.

Any solutions or workarounds are welcomed... Thanks...

hello,

I have the same configuration and I have the same problem. Have you been able to solve the problem? I appreciate your help

Regards,

Ramzi

  • 11 months later...

Experienced the same issue with Windows 2008R2.

*I was unable to connect to network shares (local or on the network: \\server\share [or] \\ip\share [or] \\localhost\share) --from various places like explorer, command prompt, et cetera

*I could RDP to Server, I could query DNS and other protocols like PING were working, Server was on Network Segment where other Windows 2008 servers had no isssues

*I checked all the normal suspects Firewall, AV

::TIPOFF:: \\localhost\c$ --should exist uness you removed it and if you removed it you should know or know to check, in my case I know it exists and knowing the firewall was down i could not browse myself or access myself so i knew it was a local issue with the host

*I checked the Windows System Event Log: "Event ID 7001, TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper Service depends on the NetBT service which fialed to start because of the following error: the service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or becuase it has no enabled devices associated with it." Which led me to an old microsoft article for simular event id that occured with Windows 2000: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/278658

*I did not not see the NetBIOS over Tcpip driver (made sure show hidden devices was checked in the View drop down menu) but I did notice that there was an issue with NetBT driver (it could not start) so I disabled it then I deleted it then rebooted

*TCP/IP NetBIOS was started after reboot and network resourced (local and on the network) were available.

::This is caused by TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper not being able to start (check Services if runnin and then MS KB above)

::You can replicate by stopping TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper service.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google open-sources zero-knowledge proof code for enhanced online privacy by Paul Hill When you go out to a physical store and attempt to buy alcohol or cigarettes, you’ll get asked to show some ID; online, when you want to visit adult sites, you don’t currently need to prove your age, but lawmakers in various countries are looking to change this. One technology that has been developed to address the age checks needed is Zero-Knowledge Proof, where you prove your age without having to reveal other data like birth date or ID. To help companies develop their own Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) technologies, Google has released its ZKP libraries as open-source, meaning they can be taken and used in other projects or adapted. This will make it easier for third-party developers to create privacy-enhancing age verification applications. We heard a bit about ZKP from Google earlier this year when the company said that it was integrating the technology into Google Wallet to help disconnect your age from your identity. It also said at the time that it would be using it in other Google products and partner with apps like Bumble to help with verification. It also said at the time that it would open-source ZKP; that promise has now been fulfilled. As libraries, Google’s newly open-sourced software can be integrated into a whole range of applications. As mentioned, Google is using it in Google Wallet, and it could also be used to verify the age of people visiting adult websites without needing to reveal their identity as part of the verification process. Google has also said that the European Union’s eIDAS regulation encourages EU member states to integrate technologies like ZKP into the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet). The open-sourcing of ZKP could help with the acceleration of the development of these EUDI Wallets. The open-sourcing of the ZKP libraries by Google will benefit various groups of people. We’ve mentioned that developers will benefit as they can use the libraries in a variety of apps. Businesses will also benefit by being able to meet privacy needs more easily. Another group to benefit will be researchers who can use this “more efficient and performant ZKP implementation” to help create new applications and uses of technology. Finally, users will benefit from more private and secure digital ecosystems. Now it remains to be seen how much adoption these ZKP libraries will get, given the growing need for such technology. Image via Depositphotos.com
    • I Have a batch file that opens 2 websites dealing with money. I want to add to it with the first step to remind me to start a vpn extension that I use with chrome.  If  it is easier to use powershell that is fine too.  thx   Hope this is enough info.
    • IMO, Vivaldi feels overdesigned at this point.
    • You have to look at the value proposition. Any product can be good or bad at either the right or wrong price. At $110, the GTX 1050 was considered a good GPU for the price, and again at $160 the GTX 1650 was extremely popular and considered one of the best value GPUs ever. The problem here is this RTX 5050 has a performance uplift over the 4050 so small it is basically lost in the margin of error, yet they still price it at $250!! That is bad value. At $200 it is at least in line with the other overpriced GPUs, at $175, it would actually be a good product!
    • I built my first computer with a low profile GTX 750 Ti OC and it was a great 720p card for its time. And that was a $160 card at the time. The 50 models used to be a good mid-range for price to performance. Not anymore.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      956400 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      loose_observer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      BeeJay_Balu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      446
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      157
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      148
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!