Recommended Posts

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2008/...ring-for-flight

The baby falcon is preparing for flight

By haavard. Saturday, 29. November 2008, 03:28:15

peregrine, Opera 10

Hi everyone!

While you may have seen me around in the blogs and forums, this is my first blog post on the desktop team blog. My former team mates and I have in fact been working on the desktop product all along as a separate team, but now we have merged with the rest of the desktop developers and QA to form a new and even stronger (and bigger!) desktop team.

We know that you have been waiting to get your hands on Opera 10 (Peregrine), and I am happy to announce that we are planning to release the first alpha of Opera 10 in the near future. The new version is the result of hard work that has been going on since even before 9.5 was released, and we are finally ready to let it spread its wings and fly out into the real world.

I'm not going to reveal too many details today, but I do want to talk a bit about what you can expect.

Opera 10 will feature the new Presto 2.2 engine (Opera 9.x runs on Presto 2.1.x), and one of the main purposes of the first alpha is to get some real-world testing, so that even more bugs can be fixed. A huge number of bugs have been fixed already since Presto 2.1, and there are a lot of new things in here, including improved performance and standards compliance. We hope, no, we know that you will help us find even more bugs and areas of improvement.

In addition to an updated engine with new features of its own, we have worked hard on adding a few user-related features that we have noticed are frequently requested by the community. I think a lot of people will be pleased with these additions.

Opera 10 is finally coming, and you can expect improved performance as well as features that we know that a lot of people in the community have requested.

Tune in next week for more details.

Can't wait... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/703806-expect-opera-10-alpha-next-week/
Share on other sites

me too...but I hope they'll change the default skin, i hate it.

Yeah. An it's so nnoyingly hard to change the skin in opera too.

first you have to go to the builtin browser with previews, select a sekin you like and have it auto download and answer if you want to keep it... And then you don't even have to restart the browser....

me too...but I hope they'll change the default skin, i hate it.

yeah same here, the skin looks pretty awful. And it would be really nice if they added native vista menus like firefox.

@hawkman most of the opera skins lookn like arse, trust me I know how to change the skin. Same goes for 99% of skinable applications. I'd rather have a good native skin ANY DAY. most app skins are awful looking.

I few things I hope to get out of Opera 10: -

1. Acid 3 100/100 (They claimed they had reached it ages ago but we haven't seen it be implemented yet.

2. Default Search to be Google and not Ask on the Speed Dial.

3. Easier Bookmarks importing and managment, it's horrid right now.

4. Silverlight support. (I know this is really Microsoft's area but Opera need to do their bit.)

5. A better interface, the current one is really ugly.

6. Better update system, like Firefox's. I don't want to have to download another exe file manually when I simply want to update my browser, I want it automated.

7. Better Speed Dial options (I mya want to update the website perhaps every day but the only default options are like 5 mins, 30 mins, etc.

8. Speed, it's quite slow for me, they claimed Opera 9.6 was fast but I never saw the speed they promised.

That's about it, I know I probably won't see most of this but I can always hope.

1. Acid 3 100/100 (They claimed they had reached it ages ago but we haven't seen it be implemented yet.

There was a build you could download that did 100/100 on the acid3 test, wasn't a full pass though i don't think

4. Silverlight support. (I know this is really Microsoft's area but Opera need to do their bit.)

silverlight 2 is supported, just MS don't say it is, i believe silverlight 1 is possible to get working in Opera too, i'd also say it is down to MS to get it working + supported as its their plugin

yeah same here, the skin looks pretty awful. And it would be really nice if they added native vista menus like firefox.

@hawkman most of the opera skins lookn like arse, trust me I know how to change the skin. Same goes for 99% of skinable applications. I'd rather have a good native skin ANY DAY. most app skins are awful looking.

I certainly hope you're not running FF.

and opera can use the windows native look as well

I certainly hope you're not running FF.

and opera can use the windows native look as well

Opera's native theme looks terrible on vista. I KNOW ABOUT THE NATIVE THEME AND THEMES. Don't assume I'm retarded, I've even made a theme for opera back in the day. The menus look awful and aren't native in vista and the icons are pretty bad.

Opera's native theme looks terrible on vista. I KNOW ABOUT THE NATIVE THEME AND THEMES. Don't assume I'm retarded, I've even made a theme for opera back in the day. The menus look awful and aren't native in vista and the icons are pretty bad.

The 'native' skin looks even worse under OS X:

post-1302-1227969919_thumb.png

Horrible, just horrible. Whatever Opera 10 is going to look like, it cannot be worse than that.

The 'native' skin looks even worse under OS X:

post-1302-1227969919_thumb.png

Horrible, just horrible. Whatever Opera 10 is going to look like, it cannot be worse than that.

That looks better than the windows version :laugh:

The linux one is bar far the worst of them all though, it's beyond ugly.

The 'native' skin looks even worse under OS X:

post-1302-1227969919_thumb.png

Horrible, just horrible. Whatever Opera 10 is going to look like, it cannot be worse than that.

Arrange it with the tabs at the bottom and outide of the buttons it looks pretty muh like safari.

and as far as I know, native ues the OS resources anyway so...

And why on earth would you want roboform over opera's built in password wand, roboform is horrible.

Arrange it with the tabs at the bottom and outide of the buttons it looks pretty muh like safari.

and as far as I know, native ues the OS resources anyway so...

And why on earth would you want roboform over opera's built in password wand, roboform is horrible.

Safari looks like this:

post-1302-1227970689_thumb.png

Opera 9.62 doesn't even come close to it when it in the looks department.

Opera 10 should look better, seeing how Opera hired Jon Hicks - the guy who among other things designed the Firefox icon. To quote him:

Opera has been a browser vendor whose ideals and feature list I?ve applauded, but whose Mac interface design I?ve been, well, critical of to be honest. Now I?ve got a chance to ?put my money where my mouth is?. I?ll primarily be responsible for Opera desktop, Widgets and Mobile/Mini browsers, but general design too. I?ll hopefully get to implement the ideas I have for the logo and branding too. I can?t wait to get my teeth into it!

I'm curious to see the results of his work.

Because as i can remember, u had to manually click the wand button, which is super annoying. There were other factors also that i forgot over time, but im sure if used the browser again i'd quickly be reminded.

Also Roboform works perfect for me, and i have zero problems. Already have tons of logins saved on it, so it'd be silly to switch to something that is dependent on the browser. So if i were using Opera and it ended up having a bug that deleted all my saved passwords and such... I'd have to redo it all. using a third party application for handling something such as this is much more reliant and secure in my opinion.

Yeah, you click the wand as opposed to clickign the submit buton, since the wand does this automatically.

The Wand as well as the pre configured data fields in Opera also works far better than Roboform has ever done. Opera sync also makes it portable along with your bookmarks and other settings

Also not having the fields auto fill by themseles but using the wand button to fill and submit, avoid a certain secuity flaw that FF suffererd because of that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!