[UK]Virgin offers 30p per day mobile internet tariff


Recommended Posts

Virgin Mobile is to introduce an all-you-can-eat internet access tariff at 30p per day, which the company said is up to three times cheaper than offers from rival networks.

The new rates take effect from 8 December, and apply to both contract and pre-pay customers, according to Virgin.

Advertisement

Click here to find out more!

An enhanced mobile web portal bearing the Virgin Media brand will be unveiled at the same time, offering news, music, video, games and entertainment content.

"By providing unlimited access at a highly competitive rate, we are giving all our customers the opportunity to use the internet on their phone without having to worry about racking up huge bills or working out complicated price structures," said Virgin Mobile managing director Graeme Oxby in a statement.

However, while the 30p per day rate is billed as offering unlimited access, a daily fair use policy of 25MB applies. Customers exceeding this will be charged ?2 for each extra megabyte. Other network operators have similar fair usage policies.

Virgin Mobile said that it has confirmed more than 150 partners to provide content for the mobile portal, including Sony BMG, Sony Pictures, Disney, Hallmark, Universal, EMI, Warner Music Group, Glu and EA.

Source.

However, while the 30p per day rate is billed as offering unlimited access, a daily fair use policy of 25MB applies. Customers exceeding this will be charged ?2 for each extra megabyte.

What are the general feelings on services advertised as unlimited which are quite clearly limited?

Personally I think the ASA should intervene, more so on cases like this, where the advertiser would then go on to profit immensely when said limit is passed.

What are the general feelings on services advertised as unlimited which are quite clearly limited?

Personally I think the ASA should intervene, more so on cases like this, where the advertiser would then go on to profit immensely when said limit is passed.

I'd call that CHEATING :shiftyninja:

I like the idea of this :)

Sounds like it is per day, and you don't have to sign up for a month. I find some days I can spend plenty of time on mobile internet, and other days none.

I think advertising it as unlimited is slightly bad, however it will be enough for most people and everyone should read the small print!.

I think the "unlimited" advertising is really disgraceful. 25mb isn't THAT much for the net now, you just need to go to a site with a couple of large images and you're seeing 5+% of your bandwidth walk out the door in seconds.

My phone from O2 has "unlimited" data, but the cap is 3gb for a month, which is a lot more forgiving than 25mb a day.

I think the "unlimited" advertising is really disgraceful. 25mb isn't THAT much for the net now, you just need to go to a site with a couple of large images and you're seeing 5+% of your bandwidth walk out the door in seconds.

My phone from O2 has "unlimited" data, but the cap is 3gb for a month, which is a lot more forgiving than 25mb a day.

the problem is, you can go over 25mb a day so there isn't really a limit, except your wallet, i dont think any mobile provider has truly unlimited data mainly because the mobile networks aren't made for large data transfers so they have to stop people using mobile internet like they would a standard internet connection

What are the general feelings on services advertised as unlimited which are quite clearly limited?

Personally I think the ASA should intervene, more so on cases like this, where the advertiser would then go on to profit immensely when said limit is passed.

How many websites a day do you have to go on, on your phone, to go over 25mb.

On my Vodafone contract I pay ?10 a month for "unlimited" internet, and get 500MB, so Virgin are actually giving a fairly good deal since I basically pay 33p a day for 16.7MB, and I have to pay every day for that whether I use it or not (I generally do use it a lot though).

I never really go over it though, 500MB is enough, although I do wish they wouldn't advertise it as "unlimited".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!