Recommended Posts

We were pointed out that Intel's Nehalem, the CPU that we know as Core i7 has TLB. TLB, three letters that have destroyed the sales of Phenom and Opterons based on 65nm K10 cores stands for Translation Lookaside Buffer and Intel officialy states in its Intel Core i7 Processor, Extreme Edition Series and Intel Core i7 Processor - Specification Update PDF that the CPU has a TLB bug.

If you open Intel?s official document that is nicely stored here, on page 37 AAJ1 Clarification of TRANSLATION LOOKASIDE BUFFERS (TLBS) Invalidation part, you will see that Intel tells that in some rare cases improper TLB invalidation may result in unpredictable system behaviour and can hang your OS or result with incorrect data. Here is the word to word "In rare instances, improper TLB invalidation may result in unpredictable system behavior, such as system hangs or incorrect data. Developers of operating systems should take this documentation into account when designing TLB invalidation algorithms. For the processors affected, Intel has provided a recommended update to system and BIOS vendors to incorporate into their BIOS to resolve this issue."

We are not sure if you should be concerned, but such a thing completely destroyed K10?s reputation and we will certainly do a bit more investigating about it, and ask Intel for a comment. We would like to thank one of our readers for the tip.

source

that sound sca:no::no:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/704664-nehalem-also-has-a-tlb-bug/
Share on other sites

Loads of processors have crippling bugs, my C2D has about 3 or 4 known "showstopper" bugs

They're worked around in software, as they always have been.

Somehow, the TLB bugs seems to be worst than some others. Just look at the performance hit that AMD had with their Phenom with the TLB problem....

That's a HUGE Oupss from Intel, since they could have learned from AMD.....

Here's the page of the desktop Core 2 Duo E7000 and E8000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/318733.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 47.

Here's the page of the desktop Core 2 Duo X6800, E6000 and E4000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/313279.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 71.

Here's the page of the desktop Pentium Dual Core E2000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/316982.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 59.

Here's the page of the Intel Celeron 200 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...dt/31854702.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 53.

Should I continue? :p

Here's the page of the desktop Core 2 Duo E7000 and E8000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/318733.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 47.

Here's the page of the desktop Core 2 Duo X6800, E6000 and E4000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/313279.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 71.

Here's the page of the desktop Pentium Dual Core E2000 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...updt/316982.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 59.

Here's the page of the Intel Celeron 200 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor...dt/31854702.pdf

It has the exact same text written on page 53.

Should I continue? :p

mm Q6600 isnt in here i am safe then :p

/jking i know , i know same deal as E66xx lol

That's just sad :(

I know allot of people who dumped over 2 grand on their Core i7 machines. To be honest I sort of predicted this would happen which is one of the reasons besides the high priced memory, and architecture.

My new build is for a Phenom II. It may not be the fastest but it can get me places

But when AMD had same it was blown out proportion, to the extent that they had to be seen to fix.

AMD's bug was similar in chances of effecting a system.

Lets hope press blow this up and lowers price Intels chips that has increased recently due numerous issues.

Was this during the Pentium III era?
No, Pentium First of the name.

Actually, my father brought an 486 computer even after the release of the Pentium one year before.

He said that back in the days, the Pentium wasn't recommendable :huh:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F00f

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

Was this during the Pentium III era?

No this was affecting Pentium 60 (and I think 75) , the first series of Pentiums.

Intel was smart at that time, and used the faulty chips to make key rings, ear rings, bracelets etc..

I still have a Keyring incorporating a Pentium 60 core. :)

No this was affecting Pentium 60 (and I think 75) , the first series of Pentiums.

Intel was smart at that time, and used the faulty chips to make key rings, ear rings, bracelets etc..

I still have a Keyring incorporating a Pentium 60 core. :)

They did this with the Pentium 4 "Willamette" if I'm not mistaken.

I dont know.. they may have done it with that too, but the FDIV was the P60 bug, and that was some.. 18 years ago.. more or less..

:s

probably more :s crap I am old..

I was about to say nah way out it was 98 or so, lol.

But 1993 dam time flies. I spent fortune going from 60 to a 90.

I was about to say nah way out it was 98 or so, lol.

But 1993 dam time flies. I spent fortune going from 60 to a 90.

I wish it was 1998..

I had a 486 DX4-100 at the time, with a Promise IDE controller with 256KB cache on board and two (!!) 40GB hard drives.

Im depressed now.

lol yeah

putting Spectrum etc aside.

My first PC was 386 8Mhz with button made it 16Mhz I didn't ever put on 16Mhz as didn't know what it was.

I spent ?145.00 ($250.00 usd) on upgrading to 2 mb ram so could play Links 386 it took 20-40 seconds redraw screen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!