Recommended Posts

No. Because the secure desktop makes it not possible.

Sorry, I meant when Secure Desktop's disabled.

I don't mind Secure Desktop being there, but I would like a more elegant solution to the hard flicker.

Betcha it wouldn't.

Begin rant.

At the moment, my pet peeve is glass on maximized applications. The whole point of making an application's title bar and the task bar turn black when an application is maximized is to pull focus to that application, which I think it does very well. However, Microsoft have bent to the will of the small number of very loud people who don't seem to understand this and have changed the behavior in Windows 7 so that maximized applications retain their glass title bar, which looks absolutely stupid. Why can't they just implement a check box: "I like things that look flashy and I don't understand interaction design principles".

End rant.

Other things I'd change:

  • Develop a clear media strategy. Ship it with either WMP or Zune. Whilst I prefer Zune, I would prefer a singular media strategy even more
  • Fix the clock in Media Center, in the PDC build in appears seemingly randomly
  • Fix the included MP4 and AVI splitters, they don't correctly handle multiple audio tracks (they play both tracks simultaneously)
  • Ship with a reading application, something that can read most major document and image formats
  • Fix IE8 performance problems. Here's a hint, the biggest performance issue is when opening a new tab, which takes ages
  • Support ID3 v2.4. It allows Unicode, and is among other nice improvements
  • This will get me crucified but anyway, undo the changes to UAC, or at least make the highest security level the default. They've swung the security pendulum too far back in the other direction

I'm sure there are others, but that will have to do for the moment.

Id like to see Windows 7 go even further with keeping the glass effect as atm it is stupid, when the window is maximised keep the window curves like when some apps open the full size of the screen but not as maximised. If that makes any sense. Now all I can hope is for Bill Gates to look through this thread and read this post.

I would like to agree, but consider that the new default UAC setting in Windows 7 was nonexistent, at least to the user, in Vista. It was a black and white situation: either prompt everything, or don't prompt at all. Now only downloaded apps get the prompt, which would also include any malware that silently downloaded itself to the user's system.

I'll still keep the slider at the second highest level... I don't really trust myself to do things correctly the first time. :p

ANYTHING in the pre-beta is not final, the UAC settings included.

But about Secure Desktop: has there EVER been any proof of concept code that allows an app to hijack the UAC dialog?

Do you mean without the Secure Desktop? There are specific attacks in mind that it is designed to mitigate/prevent. If there were not, it would not be the default setting (nobody likes it, but it's needed to make the prompt secure). Obviously, discussing specific attack methods isn't something I'm too keen on right now.

Where did the secure desktop go? I don't see it when I get my UAC prompts

Secure Desktop's only available at the highest setting. For now at least.

ANYTHING in the pre-beta is not final, the UAC settings included.

I know, just saying. :)

Since the default setting's set to only prompt for downloaded apps, I'm sensing a better solution is in the works right now.

Since the default setting's set to only prompt for downloaded apps, I'm sensing a better solution is in the works right now.

Actually even in the M3 build, the default was to prompt for anything that wasn't a Windows-signed binary in a trusted location.

I love this kind of comments :D, you probably don't know a thing about file systems in general or NTFS in particular. You couldn't name one bad thing about NTFS. Yet somewhere someday you heard someone say that NTFS is bad and you keep repeating it over and over again hoping it makes you sound smart.

Well sir, it doesn't ;)

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

Actually even in the M3 build, the default was to prompt for anything that wasn't a Windows-signed binary in a trusted location.

Ahhhh. Didn't know that.

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

Rotating hard disks suffer from fragmentation, it's not a file system problem. That problem basically goes away with solid state disks (in fact I believe Windows 7 disables fragmentation on SSDs).

Are you suggesting that the file/folder organizational model that every operating system uses needs to be replaced? Why? With what?

Besides, who cares what the physical layout of the data is... that has nothing to do with how it is presented to the user.

And what the heck does "silent data corruption" mean?

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

What on earth does 'terrible file/folder organization' have to do with the filesystem?

Every filesystem suffers from that equally, hence why we have indexed content.

To be honest whole UAC thing is hard to implement. It took me two years to get used to. Only place where it bothers me is my startup. I have everest and evga precision tool on startup so UAC pops out twice when i login. It's a bit annoying.

Two years? I gave up on UAC within a month, almost as soon as I figured out where the on/off setting was deep inside the control panel. I gave it another shot after SP1, but still not worth the extra click(s). With Win7, will just have to wait and see how the final improvements and setting controls are.

Two years? I gave up on UAC within a month, almost as soon as I figured out where the on/off setting was deep inside the control panel. I gave it another shot after SP1, but still not worth the extra click(s). With Win7, will just have to wait and see how the final improvements and setting controls are.

I really have to wonder what you people do all day that makes UAC add a significant number of "extra clicks." What software do you use on a regular basis that requires elevation?

To be honest whole UAC thing is hard to implement. It took me two years to get used to. Only place where it bothers me is my startup. I have everest and evga precision tool on startup so UAC pops out twice when i login. It's a bit annoying.

Two years to get used to it? Really? Anyways, to solve your startup problem, simply add the programs to your task scheduler to come on at startup and check the "run with highest privileges" box. Really, the software devs should just fix their software, but if they won't, this trick will get around having to click the dialog boxes.

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

For starters, all file systems have fragmentation. Also, recent versions of NTFS don't need defragmentation. Any performance drop in NTFS due to fragmentation is largely negligible, and that negligible drop is then fixed by Vista's defrag running on a schedule. In short, there are no fragmentation issues in NTFS that affect the user.

Secondly, "need for search to overcome blah blah blah" and "silent data corruption"? You really need to elaborate, and point out who fills your head with this stuff. The first doesn't even make sense and the second has no ounce of truth to support it.

Smart choice for your laptop. I picked up Athlon 64 X2, really didn't want to pay for Intel's 32bit only bull****.

What are you going on about? Intel's mobile Core 2 Duos fully support x86-64. Their last 32-bit mainstream mobile processor (Not counting the Atom. That's not a real laptop processor.) was the Core Duo, over 2 years ago.

What are you going on about? Intel's mobile Core 2 Duos fully support x86-64. Their last 32-bit mainstream mobile processor (Not counting the Atom. That's not a real laptop processor.) was the Core Duo, over 2 years ago.

I was talking about Core Duo and compared it to Athlon X64 because they are in the same class.

I was talking about Core Duo and compared it to Athlon X64 because they are in the same class.

No they aren't. The Core Duo is 32-bit (although the highest iteration of that architecture), while the Athlon X64 (AMD64 family) is natively 64-bit.

The Core Duo is dual-core, and so is the Athlon X64. But not all dual-cores were 64-bit. ;)

Edited by LTD
I really have to wonder what you people do all day that makes UAC add a significant number of "extra clicks." What software do you use on a regular basis that requires elevation?

You never know what Neowinians do on their PC's. I don't mind UAC. The half second it adds for each prompt (if I even get prompted) with highest settings. After the initial setup most people do the number of promts is greatly reduced.

Two years to get used to it? Really? Anyways, to solve your startup problem, simply add the programs to your task scheduler to come on at startup and check the "run with highest privileges" box. Really, the software devs should just fix their software, but if they won't, this trick will get around having to click the dialog boxes.

For starters, all file systems have fragmentation. Also, recent versions of NTFS don't need defragmentation. Any performance drop in NTFS due to fragmentation is largely negligible, and that negligible drop is then fixed by Vista's defrag running on a schedule. In short, there are no fragmentation issues in NTFS that affect the user.

thanks for the tips

Secondly, "need for search to overcome blah blah blah" and "silent data corruption"? You really need to elaborate, and point out who fills your head with this stuff. The first doesn't even make sense and the second has no ounce of truth to support it.

all it need is someone keep repeating the lie on himself till he believe it lol

Rotating hard disks suffer from fragmentation, it's not a file system problem. That problem basically goes away with solid state disks (in fact I believe Windows 7 disables fragmentation on SSDs).

What? Fragmentation has nothing to do with whether the disk is rotating or not. What would that have to do with anything? Solid state media can become fragmented as well. It is indeed because of the way the file system saves files.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OK, back to normal now! Ozzy Osbourne - Flying High Again (Official Music Video)  
    • The actual download size is ~130–180 MB, not 100 MB.
    • Big change of pace for me! Gunnar & the Grizzly Boys - Standard American (Official)  
    • draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 by Razvan Serea draw.io desktop is a downloadable security-first diagramming application that runs on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Creating diagrams in the desktop app doesn’t need an internet connection. This is useful when you are disconnected or when you must create diagrams in a highly secure environment, where data protection is of the utmost importance. When you use the draw.io desktop app, your diagrams will be stored on your local device. Because this is a stand-alone application, also designed to run offline, there are no interfaces to cloud storage platforms available. Of course, you can still store your diagrams in folders that are synchronised to your cloud storage if you wish. Easy-to-use diagram editor The draw.io apps work just like the office and drawing tools you are used to using. Drag and drop shapes from the shape libraries and drag to draw connectors between them. Drag connectors to add waypoints and set a precise shape and position, or let them reroute automatically. Double click and start typing to add a label to anything. Create tables and swimlane flows with a familiar tool. Style shapes and connectors with customisable palettes, sketch options, fonts and text formatting tools. Search for shapes, including in open-source icon libraries. Use our vast libraries of shapes and templates, organised into logical categories, to create a range of diagrams and infographics. Generate diagrams from text descriptions using our smart templates. Diagram faster with keyboard shortcuts. draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 changelog: Uses electron 42.4.1 Updates to draw.io core 30.2.4. Download: draw.io 64-bit | Standalone ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: draw.io 32-bit | ARM64 | ARM64 Standalone Links: draw.io Home Page | Project page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will soon allow some users to block Copilot from analyzing their Office files by Usama Jawad Microsoft Purview is a pretty useful data governance, security, and management service that allows customers to gain enhanced visibility and control over their content. It's meant for commercial customers, such as organizations that are storing data at scale. As AI continues to expand and infiltrate every corner of a firm, many are a bit conscious about the technology gaining access to their confidential data. Microsoft is now making a configuration change that will allow such customers to rest easy. Right now, users within an organization have the option to apply Purview sensitivity labels (when available) to secure certain files and label them as such. For example, if you apply the "Confidential" label on an Excel file, the file will be encrypted, and a "confidential" watermark will be applied to it. So, if this file is shared with anyone, they are aware that its access is supposed to be restricted. Up until now, Microsoft was allowing some connected experiences, like its AI services, to analyze files, regardless of their sensitivity label. This is of major concern to most organizations, as a recent example highlighted how confidential emails with data loss prevention (DLP) policies like privacy labels were being uploaded to Copilot for analysis. As such, Microsoft is updating an existing Purview data label sensitivity setting that prevents "some connected experiences that analyze content", from being blocked completely from doing this. The label isn't changing, but the blocking is now being enforced across all connected services (including Copilot and other AI tools), and now extends to Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Files with the label applied already will get this enhancement automatically too once it becomes available. Microsoft has urged IT admins to inform their respective helpdesk and compliance teams, update internal documentation, and review sensitivity labels to ensure that they meet their respective compliance needs. This change is tagged as MC1297982 in the Message Center. General availability is scheduled to begin in a phased manner soon and will complete by the end of next month. That said, it is important to note that this only applies to commercial customers who have a license that allows them to use Purview.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      191
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!