Recommended Posts

No. Because the secure desktop makes it not possible.

Sorry, I meant when Secure Desktop's disabled.

I don't mind Secure Desktop being there, but I would like a more elegant solution to the hard flicker.

Betcha it wouldn't.

Begin rant.

At the moment, my pet peeve is glass on maximized applications. The whole point of making an application's title bar and the task bar turn black when an application is maximized is to pull focus to that application, which I think it does very well. However, Microsoft have bent to the will of the small number of very loud people who don't seem to understand this and have changed the behavior in Windows 7 so that maximized applications retain their glass title bar, which looks absolutely stupid. Why can't they just implement a check box: "I like things that look flashy and I don't understand interaction design principles".

End rant.

Other things I'd change:

  • Develop a clear media strategy. Ship it with either WMP or Zune. Whilst I prefer Zune, I would prefer a singular media strategy even more
  • Fix the clock in Media Center, in the PDC build in appears seemingly randomly
  • Fix the included MP4 and AVI splitters, they don't correctly handle multiple audio tracks (they play both tracks simultaneously)
  • Ship with a reading application, something that can read most major document and image formats
  • Fix IE8 performance problems. Here's a hint, the biggest performance issue is when opening a new tab, which takes ages
  • Support ID3 v2.4. It allows Unicode, and is among other nice improvements
  • This will get me crucified but anyway, undo the changes to UAC, or at least make the highest security level the default. They've swung the security pendulum too far back in the other direction

I'm sure there are others, but that will have to do for the moment.

Id like to see Windows 7 go even further with keeping the glass effect as atm it is stupid, when the window is maximised keep the window curves like when some apps open the full size of the screen but not as maximised. If that makes any sense. Now all I can hope is for Bill Gates to look through this thread and read this post.

I would like to agree, but consider that the new default UAC setting in Windows 7 was nonexistent, at least to the user, in Vista. It was a black and white situation: either prompt everything, or don't prompt at all. Now only downloaded apps get the prompt, which would also include any malware that silently downloaded itself to the user's system.

I'll still keep the slider at the second highest level... I don't really trust myself to do things correctly the first time. :p

ANYTHING in the pre-beta is not final, the UAC settings included.

But about Secure Desktop: has there EVER been any proof of concept code that allows an app to hijack the UAC dialog?

Do you mean without the Secure Desktop? There are specific attacks in mind that it is designed to mitigate/prevent. If there were not, it would not be the default setting (nobody likes it, but it's needed to make the prompt secure). Obviously, discussing specific attack methods isn't something I'm too keen on right now.

Where did the secure desktop go? I don't see it when I get my UAC prompts

Secure Desktop's only available at the highest setting. For now at least.

ANYTHING in the pre-beta is not final, the UAC settings included.

I know, just saying. :)

Since the default setting's set to only prompt for downloaded apps, I'm sensing a better solution is in the works right now.

Since the default setting's set to only prompt for downloaded apps, I'm sensing a better solution is in the works right now.

Actually even in the M3 build, the default was to prompt for anything that wasn't a Windows-signed binary in a trusted location.

I love this kind of comments :D, you probably don't know a thing about file systems in general or NTFS in particular. You couldn't name one bad thing about NTFS. Yet somewhere someday you heard someone say that NTFS is bad and you keep repeating it over and over again hoping it makes you sound smart.

Well sir, it doesn't ;)

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

Actually even in the M3 build, the default was to prompt for anything that wasn't a Windows-signed binary in a trusted location.

Ahhhh. Didn't know that.

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

Rotating hard disks suffer from fragmentation, it's not a file system problem. That problem basically goes away with solid state disks (in fact I believe Windows 7 disables fragmentation on SSDs).

Are you suggesting that the file/folder organizational model that every operating system uses needs to be replaced? Why? With what?

Besides, who cares what the physical layout of the data is... that has nothing to do with how it is presented to the user.

And what the heck does "silent data corruption" mean?

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

What on earth does 'terrible file/folder organization' have to do with the filesystem?

Every filesystem suffers from that equally, hence why we have indexed content.

To be honest whole UAC thing is hard to implement. It took me two years to get used to. Only place where it bothers me is my startup. I have everest and evga precision tool on startup so UAC pops out twice when i login. It's a bit annoying.

Two years? I gave up on UAC within a month, almost as soon as I figured out where the on/off setting was deep inside the control panel. I gave it another shot after SP1, but still not worth the extra click(s). With Win7, will just have to wait and see how the final improvements and setting controls are.

Two years? I gave up on UAC within a month, almost as soon as I figured out where the on/off setting was deep inside the control panel. I gave it another shot after SP1, but still not worth the extra click(s). With Win7, will just have to wait and see how the final improvements and setting controls are.

I really have to wonder what you people do all day that makes UAC add a significant number of "extra clicks." What software do you use on a regular basis that requires elevation?

To be honest whole UAC thing is hard to implement. It took me two years to get used to. Only place where it bothers me is my startup. I have everest and evga precision tool on startup so UAC pops out twice when i login. It's a bit annoying.

Two years to get used to it? Really? Anyways, to solve your startup problem, simply add the programs to your task scheduler to come on at startup and check the "run with highest privileges" box. Really, the software devs should just fix their software, but if they won't, this trick will get around having to click the dialog boxes.

I will give you one thing? Need for defragmentation. Windows Search application as solution to overcome terrible file/folder organization etc, silent data corruption etc

For starters, all file systems have fragmentation. Also, recent versions of NTFS don't need defragmentation. Any performance drop in NTFS due to fragmentation is largely negligible, and that negligible drop is then fixed by Vista's defrag running on a schedule. In short, there are no fragmentation issues in NTFS that affect the user.

Secondly, "need for search to overcome blah blah blah" and "silent data corruption"? You really need to elaborate, and point out who fills your head with this stuff. The first doesn't even make sense and the second has no ounce of truth to support it.

Smart choice for your laptop. I picked up Athlon 64 X2, really didn't want to pay for Intel's 32bit only bull****.

What are you going on about? Intel's mobile Core 2 Duos fully support x86-64. Their last 32-bit mainstream mobile processor (Not counting the Atom. That's not a real laptop processor.) was the Core Duo, over 2 years ago.

What are you going on about? Intel's mobile Core 2 Duos fully support x86-64. Their last 32-bit mainstream mobile processor (Not counting the Atom. That's not a real laptop processor.) was the Core Duo, over 2 years ago.

I was talking about Core Duo and compared it to Athlon X64 because they are in the same class.

I was talking about Core Duo and compared it to Athlon X64 because they are in the same class.

No they aren't. The Core Duo is 32-bit (although the highest iteration of that architecture), while the Athlon X64 (AMD64 family) is natively 64-bit.

The Core Duo is dual-core, and so is the Athlon X64. But not all dual-cores were 64-bit. ;)

Edited by LTD
I really have to wonder what you people do all day that makes UAC add a significant number of "extra clicks." What software do you use on a regular basis that requires elevation?

You never know what Neowinians do on their PC's. I don't mind UAC. The half second it adds for each prompt (if I even get prompted) with highest settings. After the initial setup most people do the number of promts is greatly reduced.

Two years to get used to it? Really? Anyways, to solve your startup problem, simply add the programs to your task scheduler to come on at startup and check the "run with highest privileges" box. Really, the software devs should just fix their software, but if they won't, this trick will get around having to click the dialog boxes.

For starters, all file systems have fragmentation. Also, recent versions of NTFS don't need defragmentation. Any performance drop in NTFS due to fragmentation is largely negligible, and that negligible drop is then fixed by Vista's defrag running on a schedule. In short, there are no fragmentation issues in NTFS that affect the user.

thanks for the tips

Secondly, "need for search to overcome blah blah blah" and "silent data corruption"? You really need to elaborate, and point out who fills your head with this stuff. The first doesn't even make sense and the second has no ounce of truth to support it.

all it need is someone keep repeating the lie on himself till he believe it lol

Rotating hard disks suffer from fragmentation, it's not a file system problem. That problem basically goes away with solid state disks (in fact I believe Windows 7 disables fragmentation on SSDs).

What? Fragmentation has nothing to do with whether the disk is rotating or not. What would that have to do with anything? Solid state media can become fragmented as well. It is indeed because of the way the file system saves files.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!