Recommended Posts

You can achieve that using the Win+Left or Win+Right hotkey.

Brilliant.

Now can you nudge the Media Center team for:-

Sort Media Center so can go full screen one monitor and not lock in mouse and doesn't revert back when click something.

How to improve it?

Require dual-core processors (purely to improve the user experience) or properly match options to the performance of a machine.

Only release a 64bit version (we need to move forward and sometimes that requires a gentle push).

Make sure it remembers folder views (Vista is pathetic with this).

Make sure file operations don't take unnecessarily long periods of time (there should never be a delay when emptying the recycle bin).

Make sure unresponsive apps are properly contained (Vista helped but still there's a long way to go).

Make sure networking works properly (by default Vista is an absolute nightmare when it comes to sharing printers / drives).

Make sure users never see UAC prompts unless ABSOLUTELY necessary (not for changing the system time or start menu entries).

Get rid of drive letters (come on, please!).

Allow for file / folder names with colons ':' and other common characters.

Avoid the need for restarting when installing updates (surely it could just shutdown and restart the relevant processes, even if they are system critical?).

Improve the Personalise desktop feature (Vista was a backwards move from XP).

Make the All Programs menu in the Start Menu usable (Vista was a backwards move from XP).

Make alt-tabbing / Windows-tabbing out of games perform as well as tabbing out of Firefox or Outlook (instant).

Make only one version but allow it to be customisable (Business, Home and Ultimate should all be merged into one, like OSX).

Price it sensibly. Don't make retail versions 3x the cost of OEM. Offer a considerable discount for Vista users.

Update IE to actually support standards, particularly more demanding specs like Acid3. While Acid3 means nothing in and of itself it speaks to the commitment of the developers, something WebKit/Opera have done but Mozilla/Microsoft have not. Don't be afraid to break websites just because the previous version was bad at handling standards, though give web developers plenty of warning.

Make sure WordPad (or its replacement) supports Word 2007 documents(!!).

Include the picture arranging / face recognising tool demonstrated in tech videos.

Make better use of 3D graphics cards for interface (not just gimmicky but at least reward users with systems capable of it, which would also motivate people with weaker systems to upgrade), though not at the expense of application performance.

Make the Game Explorer detect ALL games and make sure Games For Windows Live games also make an entry in the Start Menu, as now I never know where to look.

Make Add / Remove Programs work properly (stop auto-refreshing every time).

Finally, get rid of the registry or give users more control over its management. Applications can write thousands of entries all over the place, which can significantly impact systems. At the very least it should show applications that have been installed and list all the settings added or changed by that program.

expect much ? :rolleyes:

7 will just be an improved version of vista with more eye candy.

as far as only release a x64 os, i wouldn't mind it as i run x64 but it wouldn't go over well with the general user because x64 still doesn't have the amount of driver support as 32 bit has. people wont upgrade their systems to just install 7. i do see more and more retailers selling desktops & laptops with 4gigs of ram and x64 vista as of late.

7 will just be an improved version of vista with more eye candy.

Which is exactly what people want. Another drastic change like Vista was would be another flop for Microsoft, but the more incremental changes (like OS X has) allows people to adapt, and over time drastically improves the OS. Consider how nicely OS X has matured since it first came out. I think Windows users are realizing that they are much more than service packs, and they're now in for much the same thing with 7.

And I'd debate that the eye candy is at least functional eye candy. Little transitions improve user experience, which improves the mood of the user, which in fact makes a user more productive.

Which is exactly what people want. Another drastic change like Vista was would be another flop for Microsoft, but the more incremental changes (like OS X has) allows people to adapt, and over time drastically improves the OS. Consider how nicely OS X has matured since it first came out. I think Windows users are realizing that they are much more than service packs, and they're now in for much the same thing with 7.

And I'd debate that the eye candy is at least functional eye candy. Little transitions improve user experience, which improves the mood of the user, which in fact makes a user more productive.

yeah but with osx you install the new builds as free updates right ? we would have to buy windows 7, i still say 7 should just be a BIG service pack update for vista.

Today I ported my mum's most important files, email client etc over, just to let her play with it. She was completely stunned by how useful Aero Peek is, and blown away by the speed of the new build. So if this is a beta, and people already say this, it's a good thing. What I remember of Vista's beta's were ugly visual styles, slowness, and driver problems.

Today I ported my mum's most important files, email client etc over, just to let her play with it. She was completely stunned by how useful Aero Peek is, and blown away by the speed of the new build. So if this is a beta, and people already say this, it's a good thing. What I remember of Vista's beta's were ugly visual styles, slowness, and driver problems.

Your mom is a beta tester, awesome :p

yeah but with osx you install the new builds as free updates right ? we would have to buy windows 7, i still say 7 should just be a BIG service pack update for vista.

Umm no, you pay Apple $130 for every one of those updates.

I did not spend the last 2+ years developing a service pack. You don't rewrite half of the shell in a service pack.

yeah but with osx you install the new builds as free updates right ? we would have to buy windows 7, i still say 7 should just be a BIG service pack update for vista.

Nope, most of them cost around $100, a reasonable price imo.

Umm no, you pay Apple $130 for every one of those updates.

I did not spend the last 2+ years developing a service pack. You don't rewrite half of the shell in a service pack.

i didn't know that as im not an apple user, just what i heard. $130 for an update is ridiculous.

I tried it but didn't see anything special about it, it was liked a stripped down version of office. I don't see how that could have replace office 2007.

did you try 3.0 ?

open office is free and does everything ms office can, pretty much.

$130 for an update is ridiculous.

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddetai...amp;catid=10657 < Microsoft does the same pricing, and that's for one of their more limited versions. You can only get the full featured version of OS X.

And I'd expect Microsoft to charge the same as they have for a 7 upgrade.

i didn't know that as im not an apple user, just what i heard. $130 for an update is ridiculous.

Why? I mean, building an OS release is an order of magnitude more difficult and costly than a normal software project, and $130 is actually a lot less than a lot of software out there (Most Adobe products for example, which cost more and tend to have upgrades released more frequently).

Why? I mean, building an OS release is an order of magnitude more difficult and costly than a normal software project, and $130 is actually a lot less than a lot of software out there (Most Adobe products for example, which cost more and tend to have upgrades released more frequently).

i dunno, to each their own i guess. i don't have alot of $$ to blow right now, might not when 7 drops either. i may have to stick with vista for awhile yet, at least sp2 will be out soon enough.

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddetai...amp;catid=10657 < Microsoft does the same pricing, and that's for one of their more limited versions. You can only get the full featured version of OS X.

And I'd expect Microsoft to charge the same as they have for a 7 upgrade.

Amazon has that for $80, and that's not a "limited" version that's the full Home Premium release (equivalent of XP Media Center Edition). Ultimate is $150.

Amazon has that for $80, and that's not a "limited" version that's the full Home Premium release (equivalent of XP Media Center Edition). Ultimate is $150.

I didn't mean limited, I meant not full featured.

Umm no, you pay Apple $130 for every one of those updates.

I did not spend the last 2+ years developing a service pack. You don't rewrite half of the shell in a service pack.

Brandon Live it seems you are misinformed.

OS X and Windows are quite different when it comes to patches, and the money you spend on Leopard (as an example) is a new operating system (10.5). The release version (e.g. 10.5.x) would be what you call a service pack although Apple simply refer to it as an update. Think of Windows 2000 and Windows XP, that was an upgrade from 5.0 to 5.1. :)

Regarding Windows 7, the changes I think could improve the operating system:

- Improve the taskbar (allow easier rearranging of open programs/windows in the taskbar).

- Support for ID3 v2.4

- Improvements with UAC

I didn't mean limited, I meant not full featured.

But it is full featured. The things that Ultimate has which aren't in Home Premium are things that Apple charges extra for too (like $300 just for Remote Desktop).

Brandon Live it seems you are misinformed.

OS X and Windows are quite different when it comes to patches, and the money you spend on Leopard (as an example) is a new operating system (10.5). The release version (e.g. 10.5.x) would be what you call a service pack although Apple simply refer to it as an update. Think of Windows 2000 and Windows XP, that was an upgrade from 5.0 to 5.1. :)

How am I misinformed? We were talking about the OS updates like 10.5, 10.6, etc. They all cost about $130 and that's the only price you'll find it at.

Brandon Live it seems you are misinformed.

OS X and Windows are quite different when it comes to patches, and the money you spend on Leopard (as an example) is a new operating system (10.5). The release version (e.g. 10.5.x) would be what you call a service pack although Apple simply refer to it as an update. Think of Windows 2000 and Windows XP, that was an upgrade from 5.0 to 5.1. :)

Regarding Windows 7, the changes I think could improve the operating system:

- Improve the taskbar (allow easier rearranging of open programs/windows in the taskbar).

- Support for ID3 v2.4

- Improvements with UAC

the service packs for leopard are free right ? that's what i was referring to. i agree about UAC in 7 but for now i use "tweak UAC" in vista to keep it enabled but in quiet mode.

But it is full featured. The things that Ultimate has which aren't in Home Premium are things that Apple charges extra for too (like $300 just for Remote Desktop).

How am I misinformed? We were talking about the OS updates like 10.5, 10.6, etc. They all cost about $130 and that's the only price you'll find it at.

i would never pay for service pack updates, are you sure about this ? i mean i had osx86 installed before and the update manager asked me if i wanted to install 10.5.4 or something like that but it didn't say anything about having to pay for it. :blink:

anyways were getting off topic a bit here.

Windows 7 is nothing like vista SP2, and if you really paid that much then you got ripped off.

Full Retail version of Vista Ultimate was $400. Windows 7 = Vista SP2. I don't give **** about GUI, underneath is the same ****.

Vista will get IE8, DX11, WMP12, and other things.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!