Recommended Posts

If the items were locked to the center of the taskbar, then in terms of appearance if really would be something like a dock. :laugh: .

Lol well it actually annoys me when people compare the new taskbar to Mac OS X's dock and other docks :( It works nothing like the dock and the only reason why it looks remotely similar is because the application icons are a little larger. In my opinion that is how application icons should look whether they are in Windows Explorer, the 'start' menu or the taskbar, they should be larger as they look better that way :) Also, there is no need to for text in the taskbar, until you hover over a thumbnailed window. The new Windows 7 taskbar is brilliant and it is nothing like the dock, so I hope people stop saying that :D I say, centre all the way! :p

If the items were locked to the center of the taskbar, then in terms of appearance if really would be something like a dock. :laugh: .

And it would suffer the same shortcomings of a center-aligned icon layout. Like obviating the muscle-memory advantage the taskbar has, since things would move around as you opened new applications. That's one of many things that make the dock suck in my opinion...

And it would suffer the same shortcomings of a center-aligned icon layout. Like obviating the muscle-memory advantage the taskbar has, since things would move around as you opened new applications. That's one of many things that make the dock suck in my opinion...

I sort of understand what you mean by muscle-memory, but am confused as to what moves around (in relation to the icons and the taskbar) as you open new applications?

Make Windows 7 better ? In terms of an OS Windows 7 is shaping up nicely but I still feel Microsoft isnt doing enough for security. Whilst its improved alot since xpsp2 onwards Microsoft need to stay a step ahead and it just doesnt feel like that is happening. Also (this is windows and all other microsoft products) there needs to be a phasing out of 32bit and a shift towards 64bit pure apps.

Edited by andy2004
Make Windows 7 better ? In terms of an OS Windows 7 is shaping up nicely but I still feel Microsoft isnt doing enough for security. Whilst its improved alot since xpsp2 onwards Microsoft need to stay a step ahead and it just doesnt feel like that is happening.

Then again Microsoft is releasing that Microsoft Codename 'Morro' AntiMalware/Virus product, which will be free.

I hope it's going to be at least as good as Avast or AVG, both free for home users, otherwise Morro will be fail.

And it would suffer the same shortcomings of a center-aligned icon layout. Like obviating the muscle-memory advantage the taskbar has, since things would move around as you opened new applications. That's one of many things that make the dock suck in my opinion...

The Windows 7 taskbar does that anyway when it shows text next to the icon for open apps. Centering everything would just look better.

On your dock point, it's actually better than the 7 bar simply because no text appears next to it; if you have all the apps you use on a daily basis in the dock, muscle memory works all the time.

The Windows 7 taskbar does that anyway when it shows text next to the icon for open apps. Centering everything would just look better.

On your dock point, it's actually better than the 7 bar simply because no text appears next to it; if you have all the apps you use on a daily basis in the dock, muscle memory works all the time.

+1

Centering Apps / icons on the taskbar would make so much sense. Why can't Microsoft add that or 'right justified' Apps / icons as a choice? Can't imagine it would be that difficult. Right?

Out of interest why is it when you have different apps open and hover your mouse over the taskbar (build 6801 with blue badge enabled) each app has its own different taskbar colour ?

It's just the same as what Microsoft did with IE8 and originally I think it came from Microsoft Excel where Tab Coloring is optional.

I have no idea why it's a good idea or if these colors are randomly assigned. But this should either be an option (set custom color for an app, similar to what Excel does) or scrap the idea altogether.

Out of interest why is it when you have different apps open and hover your mouse over the taskbar (build 6801 with blue badge enabled) each app has its own different taskbar colour ?
It's just the same as what Microsoft did with IE8 and originally I think it came from Microsoft Excel where Tab Coloring is optional.

I have no idea why it's a good idea or if these colors are randomly assigned. But this should either be an option (set custom color for an app, similar to what Excel does) or scrap the idea altogether.

What it does is take the most prominent RGB value of the application's icon and use that as the colour for the background of the hover :) It's very clever and it is one of the features I like most about the new taskbar, along with the progress of file transfers/downloads being able to be displayed within the icon in the taskbar and the icon able to change automatically to different thingd (e.g. when you get a new instant message in Windows Live Messenger - not that is will do that with Windows Live Messenger, but it can).

There is so much more to the new taskbar which a lot of people do not know about. The main thing I love has to be the fact that the 'Quick Launch' is now integrated within the task pane though and 'Quick Launch' icons turn into running instances - genius :)

+1

Centering Apps / icons on the taskbar would make so much sense. Why can't Microsoft add that or 'right justified' Apps / icons as a choice? Can't imagine it would be that difficult. Right?

It's just the same as what Microsoft did with IE8 and originally I think it came from Microsoft Excel where Tab Coloring is optional.

I have no idea why it's a good idea or if these colors are randomly assigned. But this should either be an option (set custom color for an app, similar to what Excel does) or scrap the idea altogether.

That color is based on the dominant color of the application icon in question...

It's for one to easily choose an app, since most users identify their applications by the icon, and as a result color too..

eg. IE: blue

Besides, it looks pretty

The Windows 7 taskbar does that anyway when it shows text next to the icon for open apps. Centering everything would just look better.

It does, but not by default. If you saw that in screenshots, that's strictly a user-changeable setting. By default, no text appears at all, just a highlighted rectangle.

On your dock point, it's actually better than the 7 bar simply because no text appears next to it; if you have all the apps you use on a daily basis in the dock, muscle memory works all the time.

Read above.

If kept at the default settings, Windows 7's taskbar is best for muscle memory. New applications will always open to the right of all pinned icons.

I sort of understand what you mean by muscle-memory, but am confused as to what moves around (in relation to the icons and the taskbar) as you open new applications?

If you center everything, and you start an application that isn't pinned on the taskbar, everything would shift around to make room for the new icon. That's what happens on the dock.

If you center everything, and you start an application that isn't pinned on the taskbar, everything would shift around to make room for the new icon. That's what happens on the dock.

Ahhh of course! I was being silly and was only thinking of pinned applications! I completely forgot about the ones which weren't pinned.

Thank you for clearing that up for me :)

The Windows 7 taskbar does that anyway when it shows text next to the icon for open apps. Centering everything would just look better.

Right but that's a non-standard configuration.

On your dock point, it's actually better than the 7 bar simply because no text appears next to it; if you have all the apps you use on a daily basis in the dock, muscle memory works all the time.

Huh? No text appears next to icons on the Win7 taskbar... unless you specifically turn it on. The taskbar is much better because it's about windows as it always has been. The dock is an application launcher, with some goofy horribly inconsistent window management tacked on top.

I find the dock to be pretty terrible. When I click on an icon, half the time it adds a new entry to the dock. Other times it doesn't. You have no idea what it's going to do. Some apps add an entry for every main window, which shifts things around and makes it hard to find what I'm looking for. Other apps don't do that and then you have no way at all to switch to one of its windows using the dock. You have to switch to it and then use the per-app expose or just move stuff out of the way to find it.

The one thing also i miss is from xp when you could expand all programs into a scrollable column. Now I dont mind vistas start menu but wish it was slightly wider in all programs as some items like for ex in Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 some item names get cut off. Can we not have a slightly wider all programs column or have a facility to pop it out and expand the width ?

Ahh, I thought that it was a default setting to have text next to the window. My bad, guess it is better in that case. I still think it would look better in the middle though, especially since the apps you use on a daily basis should be pinned, so very little would be shifted.

As for your problems with the OS X dock, I have a feeling you haven't used OS X for more than 10 minutes. Say what you will, but you're simply wrong. Only poorly coded applications, which you don't need to use as there's almost always a well coded app, will ever open more than one icon. It's not part of how the windows on OS X work. And I wouldn't call the way windows work a hack. It's exactly the same as in Windows 7. Exactly the same. The only difference is that Windows 7 expands on the idea by offering thumbnails you can click to open a specific window. On OS X, you have to click the application icon and cmd + ` through the windows. The thumbnails are what I would like to see in OS X. But other than that, it's simply the same thing, and it's a good solution.

Ahh, I thought that it was a default setting to have text next to the window. My bad, guess it is better in that case. I still think it would look better in the middle though, especially since the apps you use on a daily basis should be pinned, so very little would be shifted.

As for your problems with the OS X dock, I have a feeling you haven't used OS X for more than 10 minutes. Say what you will, but you're simply wrong. Only poorly coded applications, which you don't need to use as there's almost always a well coded app, will ever open more than one icon. It's not part of how the windows on OS X work. And I wouldn't call the way windows work a hack. It's exactly the same as in Windows 7. Exactly the same. The only difference is that Windows 7 expands on the idea by offering thumbnails you can click to open a specific window. On OS X, you have to click the application icon and cmd + ` through the windows. The thumbnails are what I would like to see in OS X. But other than that, it's simply the same thing, and it's a good solution.

I haven't had the privilege of using the new taskbar, so there's one thing I'd like to ask. How is minimizing handled?

When I click on an icon in the taskbar does the entire group minimize? Or, something? :huh: .

There isn't really a way to minimize an app easily using the new taskbar. You could always hover over the button, then the thumbnail and then right click>Minimize

Of course that is worse than what we have currently..and you might just use the minimize button at the top right corner..

But why would you need to minimize an application? To go to the desktop? There's the show desktop

Open a new program? Just open, you don't have to minimize a window to open a new program.

Switching to another program, just click on the other apps' button on the taskbar.

IMO, minimize is something that can be done without nowadays..

I haven't thought deeply into user scenarios yet that renders minimizing an app important.

Anyway, if you choose to use any of the other options (no grouping for instance), just click on the app 'button' would minimize it (like previously?)

There isn't really a way to minimize an app easily using the new taskbar. You could always hover over the button, then the thumbnail and then right click>Minimize

Of course that is worse than what we have currently..and you might just use the minimize button at the top right corner..

But why would you need to minimize an application? To go to the desktop? There's the show desktop

Open a new program? Just open, you don't have to minimize a window to open a new program.

Switching to another program, just click on the other apps' button on the taskbar.

IMO, minimize is something that can be done without nowadays..

I haven't thought deeply into user scenarios yet that renders minimizing an app important.

Anyway, if you choose to use any of the other options (no grouping for instance), just click on the app 'button' would minimize it (like previously?)

I use 'Minimise' a lot since Windows Vista was released and the only reason for this is so the glass behind the focused window becomes clearer and I can see what is behind it, without it looking cluttered. If there was something which sorted out this problem, then yes, I would agree that minimising can be done without :)

Here's my solution:

When you select a window from the taskbar, or start up a new instance of an application, all other windows would automatically minimise to the taskbar.

If you wanted a certain application to not minimise automatically (for example there is a certain application you use regularly which you like to have showing, along with your focussed window) then there could be a 'Pin' button where the current 'Minimise' button is which you could easily press whenever needed (or set to always pin that certain application). These pinned applications would not minimise when you select a new window from the taskbar or a new instance of an application. Windows applied to the left and right of the screen, using 'Aero Snap', and maybe maximised applications (?), would be exempt from this 'automatic minimise' behaviour.

Is this not a good idea?

I think it makes sense to do this because then you can see what is behind the glass - it would be much clearer without it looking 'cluttered' and you do not have to minimise every single instance of an application yourself - making Windows much more user friendly, efficient and intuitive :)

I personally think that is a very good idea, I would like everyone else's thoughts on this :) Particularly Brandon's.

Even after using Vista for 2.5 years, I don't really understand how u see through the glass to the underlying window..The glass is just around the top and borders of a window?

You can't exactly make the whole window glasslike like how it is done in Win 7 with the hovering over thumbnails..so I'm pretty confused by what you mean..

I feel that Win 7's way of focusing the window, making all other windows 'pure' glass when hovering over a thumbnail probably does whatever you might be trying to achieve? (Though those thumbnails should appear faster than what we have now..)

Oh..and Alt-Tab seems faster than minimizing an app..what say you?

Ahh, I thought that it was a default setting to have text next to the window. My bad, guess it is better in that case. I still think it would look better in the middle though, especially since the apps you use on a daily basis should be pinned, so very little would be shifted.

As for your problems with the OS X dock, I have a feeling you haven't used OS X for more than 10 minutes. Say what you will, but you're simply wrong. Only poorly coded applications, which you don't need to use as there's almost always a well coded app, will ever open more than one icon. It's not part of how the windows on OS X work. And I wouldn't call the way windows work a hack. It's exactly the same as in Windows 7. Exactly the same. The only difference is that Windows 7 expands on the idea by offering thumbnails you can click to open a specific window. On OS X, you have to click the application icon and cmd + ` through the windows. The thumbnails are what I would like to see in OS X. But other than that, it's simply the same thing, and it's a good solution.

My last laptop was a Macbook, I've had plenty of experience with Macs ;)

The dock and the taskbar are nothing alike. Windows 7's grouping doesn't "expand on the dock" in any way. It expands on Vista and XP's grouping functionality. The dock has no window grouping functionality, which is because the dock isn't even about managing windows. It's not just that there aren't thumbnails, there's no list at all. You just switch to the app and then cmd + ' through them, or use expose.

The taskbar is different. It isn't about switching applications, it's about managing windows, and always has been.

Here's my solution:

When you select a window from the taskbar, or start up a new instance of an application, all other windows would automatically minimise to the taskbar.

If you wanted a certain application to not minimise automatically (for example there is a certain application you use regularly which you like to have showing, along with your focussed window) then there could be a 'Pin' button where the current 'Minimise' button is which you could easily press whenever needed (or set to always pin that certain application). These pinned applications would not minimise when you select a new window from the taskbar or a new instance of an application. Windows applied to the left and right of the screen, using 'Aero Snap', and maybe maximised applications (?), would be exempt from this 'automatic minimise' behaviour.

Is this not a good idea?

I think it makes sense to do this because then you can see what is behind the glass - it would be much clearer without it looking 'cluttered' and you do not have to minimise every single instance of an application yourself - making Windows much more user friendly, efficient and intuitive :)

I personally think that is a very good idea, I would like everyone else's thoughts on this :) Particularly Brandon's.

Haha, sorry I would hate that :p

Even after using Vista for 2.5 years, I don't really understand how u see through the glass to the underlying window..The glass is just around the top and borders of a window?

You can't exactly make the whole window glasslike like how it is done in Win 7 with the hovering over thumbnails..so I'm pretty confused by what you mean..

I feel that Win 7's way of focusing the window, making all other windows 'pure' glass when hovering over a thumbnail probably does whatever you might be trying to achieve? (Though those thumbnails should appear faster than what we have now..)

Oh..and Alt-Tab seems faster than minimizing an app..what say you?

I don't know whether I explained myself properly or not? But you completely misunderstood what I was trying to say :D :)

What I mean is if you have 2 or 3 windows open and they are different sizes, overlapping each other and at different positions on the screen, sometimes you can see some of the other application through the glass titlebar of the focussed application. This makes it look and feel more cluttered and also means you cannot see through the glass all the way to your desktop background. Whilst doing this, the glass also seems to become less clear.

There isn't really a way to minimize an app easily using the new taskbar. You could always hover over the button, then the thumbnail and then right click>Minimize

Of course that is worse than what we have currently..and you might just use the minimize button at the top right corner..

But why would you need to minimize an application? To go to the desktop? There's the show desktop

Open a new program? Just open, you don't have to minimize a window to open a new program.

Switching to another program, just click on the other apps' button on the taskbar.

IMO, minimize is something that can be done without nowadays..

I haven't thought deeply into user scenarios yet that renders minimizing an app important.

Anyway, if you choose to use any of the other options (no grouping for instance), just click on the app 'button' would minimize it (like previously?)

For me, minimizing a window is simply about getting it the heck out of the way, without having to close anything.

In Windows 7, I've read that the way to quickly minimize a window is to press Win+Down, but moving my hand from my mouse to the down button and back isn't really easy. If there isn't a simple way, no matter, I'll adapt.

Haha, sorry I would hate that :p

Thank you for your input :D

Any reason? For some reason I think it sounds like it would be more efficient :/

For me, minimizing a window is simply about getting it the heck out of the way, without having to close anything.

In Windows 7, I've read that the way to quickly minimize a window is to press Win+Down, but moving my hand from my mouse to the down button and back isn't really easy. If there isn't a simple way, no matter, I'll adapt.

Can't you just click the 'minimise' button in the titlebar? If you are on about a window which isn't focussed then you may benefit from my suggestion of window management, if it was ever implemented :)

Can't you just click the 'minimise' button in the titlebar? If you are on about a window which isn't focussed then you may benefit from my suggestion of window management, if it was ever implemented :) .

Well, the minimize button on the top of a window isn't always going to be in the same spot, since the windows aren't always maximized. When there's a group of windows open and I only want to minimize a few of them, it was always easy to just click on their respective buttons on the taskbar. Again, I was only wondering about it. Whatever the new system is, I'll get used to it. I'm probably in some extreme minority anyway. :laugh: .

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!