Did Heavy Rain impress you before? What about now?


Recommended Posts

Wait until it's released ...

It's as simple as that tbh, it looks good, finer details have time to be ironed out. From what they are showing i'm interested in it. That's good enough for me right now.

Seems interesting story wise. Looks great, but some of the water/reflection effects aren't all that good. Seems they might have put a little more into that.

I'm not sold on the game play, seems more like an interactive movie. If all it is is testing to see how fast I can press a button that comes up on the screen then I'll pass.

I've been looking for an excuse to buy a PS3, if the game play is good this could be it.

HawkMan you do realize the amount of time you probably spend on a bike/vehicle in this game will be non-existent?

Well the game is called heavy "rain", and it seems to mostly be set at night, and several of the screenshots seems to be outside... so they should put half an effort into making it look good. and lights at night is quite important to the looks of a night scene. I mean, you don't look at night shots and go "oooh, look at the prety black inbetween the splotches of light",do you ? :p

and even if it's minor, it is part of the game and they should do it right, the reflections are fairly easy to do at least semi decent, and they'd practically have to remove default rendering opetiosn to get rid of specular highlights on the road surface from the lights too :)

And as I said, it looks very good though it lacks some olish, and it's not impressive, impressive means it sets a new bar above what is allready set, and it doesn't. in some scenes it macthes some of the best stuff done, but doesn't impress beyond it, and in ither scenes, it just a letdown, compared to the rest.

I see plenty of jaggies but then again, trailers / videos are horrible to judge a thing like AA.

You just can't post a compressed or streamed video of a game and then expect to see all the finer details! The way some software like Flash playbacks a compressed video 'eliminates' jaggies or rather replaces the visible edges with the fine pixelation.

Just wait until the game is released and proper, unedited, uncompressed screenshots are released or see it for yourself on a TV but judging AA from semi low-res videos and screenshots is just daft - So many games through times look so butter smooth on pre-release media but had very noticeable jaggies when released.

Wait until it's released ...

Tell me though Sethos why don't we get this crazy wave of AA complaining in every other game topic then if absolutely no screenshot or image can be judged until its in your hands?

Double standards?

Or are people just deciding which games they want to assault and which they'll say nothing about?

I'm defending this game because it's rather nice to see developers further graphics and in this case take a good approach on realism, while people are assualting the game to hell and back as if it looks like a PS2 upscale or something. Why is it being held against standards unobtainable in the gaming world?

I know the best judgement is on your own tv, in a disc in your console, but I'll be damned if some people actually believe what they're posting in this topic being that they seemingly NEVER EVER believe anything they see in preview/real time before release.

It'll be interesting to see responses from some of you in other game topics discussing pre-release titles ;)

Well the game is called heavy "rain", and it seems to mostly be set at night, and several of the screenshots seems to be outside... so they should put half an effort into making it look good. and lights at night is quite important to the looks of a night scene. I mean, you don't look at night shots and go "oooh, look at the prety black inbetween the splotches of light",do you ? :p

and even if it's minor, it is part of the game and they should do it right, the reflections are fairly easy to do at least semi decent, and they'd practically have to remove default rendering opetiosn to get rid of specular highlights on the road surface from the lights too :)

And as I said, it looks very good though it lacks some olish, and it's not impressive, impressive means it sets a new bar above what is allready set, and it doesn't. in some scenes it macthes some of the best stuff done, but doesn't impress beyond it, and in ither scenes, it just a letdown, compared to the rest.

In just about every single game out there, you'll find small things to nitpick at, so if you see the road with rain on it for like a total of 5 minutes in Heavy Rain, I hardly think it's a deal breaker that's going to ruin your visual enjoyment of the title.

As for the standards set, the only other adventure game I've seen with graphics looking to be on par with this is Alan Wake. And we've seen very little of it, but I remember a screenshot, ONE screenshot was posted recently and I don't remember every single part of it being torn apart and AA worries being mentioned :p

Tell me though Sethos why don't we get this crazy wave of AA complaining in every other game topic then if absolutely no screenshot or image can be judged until its in your hands?

Double standards?

Or are people just deciding which games they want to assault and which they'll say nothing about?

I'm defending this game because it's rather nice to see developers further graphics and in this case take a good approach on realism, while people are assualting the game to hell and back as if it looks like a PS2 upscale or something. Why is it being held against standards unobtainable in the gaming world?

I know the best judgement is on your own tv, in a disc in your console, but I'll be damned if some people actually believe what they're posting in this topic being that they seemingly NEVER EVER believe anything they see in preview/real time before release.

It'll be interesting to see responses from some of you in other game topics discussing pre-release titles ;)

Tell me AB, are you seeing my complain about AA and whatnot in this thread? I am genuinely looking forward to the game and have made no mention of Anti-Aliasing in a negative fashion. This is a clear case of PS3 negativity as usual from all parts and I would really expect you to be the first to notice.

I just tried to rectify you a bit by saying you can't really judge AA from compressed videos and screenshots from these said videos, I thought you would agree. I really don't care about AA on an exclusive title I'm looking forward to, either it's there or not. I only start caring when we are talking multi-platform titles and I'm looking for the 'prettiest' game.

So don't drag me down with the rest of the ship when I finally say something positive about a PS3 game :)

Seriusly, you don't remember the ripping the Alan Wake screenshot got? or are you just being sarastic? :p

and the lights/reflectiosn where just an example, it's just somethign very noticeabel in night shots with rain.

But then, I'm not so impressed with Alan Wake either, but that stems from the earliest tech previews of the engine when they did a fly over over ditant hills, and the hill where horribly low poly peaks with like 6 polies each, and engine in a single verticel peak, and for some reason everyone drooled oer it. and I hate it when they use really crappy low res background hills hoping you won't notice :p

Tell me AB, are you seeing my complain about AA and whatnot in this thread? I am genuinely looking forward to the game and have made no mention of Anti-Aliasing in a negative fashion. This is a clear case of PS3 negativity as usual from all parts and I would really expect you to be the first to notice.

I just tried to rectify you a bit by saying you can't really judge AA from compressed videos and screenshots from these said videos, I thought you would agree. I really don't care about AA on an exclusive title I'm looking forward to, either it's there or not. I only start caring when we are talking multi-platform titles and I'm looking for the 'prettiest' game.

So don't drag me down with the rest of the ship when I finally say something positive about a PS3 game :)

My comment wasn't aimed at you!

And I do agree, the video isn't a direct feed, nor is it HD resolution, but if the graphics were poor you'd still be given an indication that they were. They are definitely not poor by any standard.

Depending on your opinion on art style (it has a very clean, "real life" look, therefore you might even find it boring compared to the bloom/cell shaded masses?), you may not enjoy the graphics, but to say they're poor is digging a bit IMO.

It just saddens me that these developers are getting such negativity when they're clearly doing a good job, and other games much less impressive looking sail by not held up to the godlike standards some suddenly expect in here.

Seriusly, you don't remember the ripping the Alan Wake screenshot got? or are you just being sarastic? :p

and the lights/reflectiosn where just an example, it's just somethign very noticeabel in night shots with rain.

But then, I'm not so impressed with Alan Wake either, but that stems from the earliest tech previews of the engine when they did a fly over over ditant hills, and the hill where horribly low poly peaks with like 6 polies each, and engine in a single verticel peak, and for some reason everyone drooled oer it. and I hate it when they use really crappy low res background hills hoping you won't notice :p

It did?

Well I thought it looked great anyway.

Either my standards are out of touch, which I doubt (im quite a graphics buff), or some of you guys are expecting things not obtainable this generation, or at least not this early in it. Or it's reverse psychology and you're just choosing to downplay something that does look promising for whatever reason you feel the need to?

If you can find one of the very first Awake videos, the one where the start with a camer flyign low over a hill, then showing the then famous sunset light scene.

the mountains/hilltops the camera fly over at the start they're they're horribly low poly, it annoyed me because the whole thing didn't make sense, they're hills you won't see when you're playing, and you'll never be near them, why would they put a amera right over them in their tech demo where they're supposed to show off how awesome it is :p

This is a PS3 Exclusive still, right?

3rd party company, 2nd party title (means the title is exclusive, but company can develop other games on any platform).

SCEE are publishing and funding the game, Quantic Dream are developing it.

It was originally going to be PC and PS3, but went just PS3.

Some game physics will be made available by the use of PhysX by nVidia. It is used for console physics in general in the game. Originally for the PC, there were going to be two separate versions of the game to handle cases of a computer being equipped with the appropriate physics processing unit, and to handle cases when it is not present on the system. However, now that the game has been announced as a PlayStation 3 exclusive it is assumed that that won't be necessary.
History and background

Quantic Dream started working on Heavy Rain in February 2006. The project was announced on May 7, 2006, and three days later, a real-time 3D prototype technology demo was presented at E3 2006 at Sony Computer Entertainment's booth. The demo, titled The Casting displays various technical features of the game engine in an emotional scene featuring a motion captured virtual actor. The prototype was allegedly created in less than three months, during which Quantic Dream wrote the script, developed the graphics engine, held auditions to find the virtual actress, and recorded the scene. The demo was initially designed to be an internal prototype not shown outside the company, but upon seeing the team's work-in-progress a few weeks before E3, Sony asked them to complete a working demo to be presented to the audience.

Collaboration with developer Quantic Dream to redefine cinematic

realtime entertainment

LONDON, July 3 2007 – Sony Computer Entertainment Worldwide Studios (SCE

WWS) is pleased to announce that it will be collaborating with developer Quantic

Dream on an exclusive PLAYSTATION?3 (PS3™) title – more details of which are to

be announced soon. Quantic Dream has an outstanding track record in delivering

interactive, cinematic games with true emotional depth. Combined with the power of

Cell Broadband Engine™ and game development technology of PS3, the project is

expected to set a new benchmark in delivering emotionally compelling experiences to

gamers.

Founded in 1997 by David Cage, French developer Quantic Dream has achieved

international renown for its ground-breaking innovation within the games industry,

particularly in the areas of interactive narration and emotional content. The studio’s

record speaks for itself: in particular Quantic Dream was responsible for 2005’s

award winning Fahrenheit (known as Indigo Prophecy in the US and Canada), a

paranormal, interactive blend of film and gaming that was widely praised for

re-imagining the adventure game genre.

Michael Denny, Vice President, SCE Worldwide Studios, said: “We’re really excited

to be working with Quantic Dream for the first time and to have this opportunity to

once again push the gaming experience to realise a new level of interactivity and, in

particular, to engage players at an emotional level never experienced before. We’re

looking forward to revealing more news on this special title later this year.”

David Cage, Founder, President and CEO of Quantic Dream, said, “We always

believed that “next generation” meant more meaningful content based on players’

emotional involvement. To us, PS3 is the only platform that can truly deliver on this

promise, and SCE WWS is a group that is both inspiring and pleasant to work with.”

Indigo Prophecy, Baby!!!

It should be good like IP was!

03.jpg

Yeah good game, just soiled itself near the end.

The first 2/3's were like :o back in the day as nothing else was really like it.

I'm super happy Cage posted the big Gamasutra article condoning all the mistakes he had made, unlike some developers who aren't so modest. And has said Heavy Rain is going straight down the middle with realism (spoken about in the interview on page 1).

Postmortem: Indigo Prophecy - http://gamasutra.com/features/20060620/cage_01.shtml

Great read that article if you genuinely want inside the mind of David Cage, and care for his games. Or have an interest in game development, it's a long article written from the standpoint of development.

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!