2 Terminal Servers on 2 different ports


Recommended Posts

I have a terminal server running on the default port 3389 behind a linksys router. On the router I forward port 3389 to my internal IP of 192.168.0.104. I have another terminal server with IP of 192.168.0.101. On the server I changed the terminal server listening port to 3390 and on the router I forwarded port 3390 to IP 192.168.0.101.

When I connect from inside the network with 192.168.0.101:3390, it does not work. When I use 192.168.0.101:3389 it works. I don't get it. I canged the port in the registry to 3390. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.

Yes, I just did that and it fixed the problem internally. The problem now is that I cannot connect to the server on port 3390 from outside of the network. Is this a limitation of the linksys router? It should see a request xx.xxx.xxx.xx:3390 and forward to internal IP of 192.168.0.101. It seems like that is not happening. Why not? I have FTP, email and web all forwarded and everything works.

Internally it works, externally it does not. I logged on to my computer at work to test externallly. I will test again when I am actually there but I believe that tha result will be the same.

i assume from outside that you can connect to the first server with 3389 port for RDP? but connecting to the 1.101 with 3390 does not? i've set this up on linksys routers for people before and it should be ok.. maybe need to check settings on the router and update/reboot it.

i assume from outside that you can connect to the first server with 3389 port for RDP? but connecting to the 1.101 with 3390 does not? i've set this up on linksys routers for people before and it should be ok.. maybe need to check settings on the router and update/reboot it.

Your are 100% correct! I can connect with my external IP:3389 but not with 3390. I believe that the router has the latest firmware and I will reboot it when I get home. I hope that will help but I am not optimistic.

Are you trying to hit the console? They changed the flag from /console to /admin on the new client.

Also the new client has an option to not connect if auth fails under advanced.

Are you trying to hit the console? They changed the flag from /console to /admin on the new client.

Also the new client has an option to not connect if auth fails under advanced.

No, not the console. I checked the authentication and it is set to connect and not warm. I'm just scratching my head still.

Do you get asked for auth? You dont have anything under the TS gateway settings do you?

Are you using any 3rd party security to lock down your remote desktop connections. The 2x SecureRDP for example

http://www.2x.com/securerdp/download.html

It has a feature where you can lock down the client versions that can connect -- you might need to add the new client version. I have seen this issue before.

No it does not ask me for authentication nor do I have anything under the TS gateway settings. The strange thing is that it worked fine when the port was 3389. I cange the TS listening port to 3390 and now I can only connect from the old RDP client. The only change was the port.

I am not using any third party software yet.

You really should not have any need to change the port it listens on.. As already stated -- on the router just forward 3390 to 3389 on the inside.

example

PC one publicip:3389 ext - router - int 192.168.1.100:3389

PC two publicip:3390 ext - router - int 192.168.1.101:3389

PC three publicip:3390 ext - router - int 192.168.1.102:3389

I have set this up multiple times on many different routers. If your router does not support this would be the only reason you would have change the IP your PC rdp listens on. Any decent router would allow you to listen on a different port on the public side and then forward to different port on the private side.

Here is an example from a very common dlink router.

post-14624-1228361590_thumb.png

What specific router are you using? If the native firmware does not support this -- maybe it can run 3rd party like dd-wrt, openwrt or tomato, etc. Which for sure would allow for such a basic feature.

Yeah that linksys native firmware is lame at best.. I would suggest you put 3rd party on that wrt54G of yours -- what hardware version is it?

As you can see dd-wrt clearly supports changing the port on a forward.

post-14624-1228393215_thumb.png

Yeah that linksys native firmware is lame at best.. I would suggest you put 3rd party on that wrt54G of yours -- what hardware version is it?

As you can see dd-wrt clearly supports changing the port on a forward.

post-14624-1228393215_thumb.png

It is version six.

version 6 is supported by dd-wrt and openwrt, but not tomato.

I would highly suggest you take a look at dd-wrt vs the lame native stuff. Not only will it allow you do do the different port forwards it has many many many features and enhancements over the native junk.

Here are the instructions for flashing a V6 to dd-wrt

http://www.bitsum.com/openwiking/owbase/ow.asp?WRT54G5_CFE

Thanks, I will check that out. A while back I was considering Tomato. Is this better?

On my original issue, I decided to go to another workstation that had the old version of RDP client and it was not letting me connect. Now I think that maybe it has something to do with the security on our systems. When I stated before that I could connect from the old client, it was from our terminal server here (the terminal server I am connecting to is at another location). Maybe the workstations are blocking port 3390 and the terminal server is not? I disabled the firewalls on the workstations so it must be some other security program (ISA maybe?). I will try connecting from a friend's computer and that will be my final test.

Yeah for it work the firewalls on both the client and server side are going to have to allow for the traffic. Or any other routers in between, etc.

As to dd-wrt being better than tomato -- I think so, but both have their advantages, etc. The problem is tomato does not support the version of hardware you have. So you could not run it if you wanted too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!