how would you rate ubuntu 8.10 ?


Recommended Posts

I'm happy for you, but see, I can't really download them :angry:

This was the one suggestion I was sure was going to work, but after installing the alternative drivers, blacklisting the current ones (the only difference I have is that my drivers are rt2500pci, not usb) and rebooting, I found a new icon next to the watch/date/network. "New hardware found". I was so happy to see that, I thought the troubles are over. I open it, and I get a list of new drivers available. Below the graphic card drivers were the new CVS drivers for my card. Clicking on enable didn't do sh*t. It just reported something and there was an icon next to them that looks like refresh icon in browsers. Clicking on the network icon on the panel gave me a surprise - I just managed to remove (blacklist) the old drivers, thus the card (it acts as if theres no wireless on the computer), while the new ones couldn't be enabled for some reason. I couldn't even continue the tutorial past that point...

See, I knew that using it would probably require some tweaking. I could accept that. But frankly, I gave up on Vista for problems smaller than that (bluetooth was giving me a hard time and I had some problems with display). And this seems to be so common, as if they're not doing anything about it.

And I don't know, maybe it's better I got so much trouble using it for the first time, who knows would I have been messing around in the console if not. But seriously, I didn't see anything new or mindblowing because I was so restricted by not having internet, that my old Knoppix live CD was more fun than this... At least it did what it was supposed to. I know that different hardware makes different (and sometimes no) problems, but meh.

I'm downloading Fedora 10 and Sabayon 4.

I only feel sorry I won't be able to try the other two ubuntu based distros I downloaded (Mint and Crunchbang). I mean, I could, but what's the point if it doesn't work.

Better luck next time, I guess :( I'll still try it for a bit, though, maybe I suddenly get lucky or stumble on another advice (that would work this time though).

The base install of any linux distro goes usually okay, and it's pretty terrible for speed, and comes nowhere close to Windows XP in terms of GUI speed, and applications speed. For example, browsing the internet is faster in Windows, video drivers don't work well out of the package in linux; Scrolling, watching videos is pretty terrible on hardware that can run Vista's Aero GUI perfectly. To be honest, Vista runs better than any linux distro on my laptop. Even using the fglrx hardware accelerated drivers, make it worse, compiz runs fine, but can't watch flash videos, not even AVI's or MPG's on my hard drive run smoothly. At least I can play back 720p videos in Vista without hiccups.

Then, when it gets updates, that's where linux fails. Especially with new kernel updates, they never seem to work for me. Out of all the distros I have used, I found PC Linux (Gnome) to be my favorite. It's unfortunate they don't update it.

Generally, on many different computers I use, I find Linux to be slower. My school's computer lab have a plethora of computers with different hardware (from top of the line to older PC's) running different distros of Linux. They all feel slow, slower than XP or even Vista. Such a disappointment for what could have been a great experience.

The base install of any linux distro goes usually okay, and it's pretty terrible for speed, and comes nowhere close to Windows XP in terms of GUI speed, and applications speed. For example, browsing the internet is faster in Windows, video drivers don't work well out of the package in linux; Scrolling, watching videos is pretty terrible on hardware that can run Vista's Aero GUI perfectly. To be honest, Vista runs better than any linux distro on my laptop. Even using the fglrx hardware accelerated drivers, make it worse, compiz runs fine, but can't watch flash videos, not even AVI's or MPG's on my hard drive run smoothly. At least I can play back 720p videos in Vista without hiccups.

Then, when it gets updates, that's where linux fails. Especially with new kernel updates, they never seem to work for me. Out of all the distros I have used, I found PC Linux (Gnome) to be my favorite. It's unfortunate they don't update it.

Generally, on many different computers I use, I find Linux to be slower. My school's computer lab have a plethora of computers with different hardware (from top of the line to older PC's) running different distros of Linux. They all feel slow, slower than XP or even Vista. Such a disappointment for what could have been a great experience.

If Linux was like that for me, I wouldn't touch it, and would be back on Windows.

If Linux was like that for me, I wouldn't touch it, and would be back on Windows.

i agree, this is why i triple boot and just play with ubuntu once in awhile. i will admit like others have said, ubuntu is considerably slower than even windows 7 beta. :huh:

Since I'm discussing this on another forum, I might as well post what I just wrote there:

"Newest update:

I formatted the entire drive, did a reinstall. This time before ****ing with anything else, I went straight to installing these drivers. And I did it! Yaaay.

Did it solve anything?

No. Not a thing. Internet is so slow, it simply doesn't work. Plus it just randomly disconnects, then reconnects... I get 90+ % signal strength in XP, I get 40% MAX in Ubuntu. Then the same hassle: Reboot, go to Windows, search for a new solution, download the page, reboot, go to Ubuntu, try it, it fails, reboot, go to Windows...

**** THAT.

Now, I'll try Fedora and Sabayon (this one only because it's a DVD so I figure it comes with a lot of programs - that way I can at least try some **** because in Ubuntu I couldn't do squat, I couldn't even play music while I was reading all the instructions/trying them because it doesn't come with codecs, and you need ****ing internet to get them). But I doubt it'll work... And it's such a shame, I was really looking forward to trying a lot of **** (especially since I'm trying to use free software), but what's the point if it doesn't work. Chances are, the only way I might try Linux is if I get that netbook, but I think I won't have enough money.

And I think that now, I could never recommend it to anyone but geeks / pro users / people who have the ability to regenerate nerves over night. I am seriously so ****ed off aaaaaargh!"

:angry:

:cry:

If Linux was like that for me, I wouldn't touch it, and would be back on Windows.

I like trying new OS's just to see how they are, I'm back on XP/Vista dual boot, runs like a charm, I know I'll definitely try Linux in a few days to see how the new kernel is. It always calls me back :laugh: I seriously need better hardware, looking to get a new laptop or desktop sometime in the near future. It's time to go multi-core and 64-bit :cool:

Since I'm discussing this on another forum, I might as well post what I just wrote there:

"Newest update:

I formatted the entire drive, did a reinstall. This time before ****ing with anything else, I went straight to installing these drivers. And I did it! Yaaay.

Did it solve anything?

No. Not a thing. Internet is so slow, it simply doesn't work. Plus it just randomly disconnects, then reconnects... I get 90+ % signal strength in XP, I get 40% MAX in Ubuntu. Then the same hassle: Reboot, go to Windows, search for a new solution, download the page, reboot, go to Ubuntu, try it, it fails, reboot, go to Windows...

**** THAT.

Now, I'll try Fedora and Sabayon (this one only because it's a DVD so I figure it comes with a lot of programs - that way I can at least try some **** because in Ubuntu I couldn't do squat, I couldn't even play music while I was reading all the instructions/trying them because it doesn't come with codecs, and you need ****ing internet to get them). But I doubt it'll work... And it's such a shame, I was really looking forward to trying a lot of **** (especially since I'm trying to use free software), but what's the point if it doesn't work. Chances are, the only way I might try Linux is if I get that netbook, but I think I won't have enough money.

And I think that now, I could never recommend it to anyone but geeks / pro users / people who have the ability to regenerate nerves over night. I am seriously so ****ed off aaaaaargh!"

:angry:

:cry:

what build are you using ? 8.10? if so i think that's where the problem might lie, alot of people are having issues with it atm.

Ubuntu 8.10 AMD64

Soooooo... Maybe I should try 8.04? And is there difference in stability when it comes to 32/64 bits?. I have 2 gigs of ram so there's probably no real need for 64, but I was thinking since I'm at it I might as well try it.

All the buntu's are just one big, bloated, fanboy wanna be Linux distros and have been since version 6.10!!

Gave up on that lousy thing a long time ago.

You want to use a REAL Linux distro that has all the codecs and stuff right out of the box and isn't so bloated and really works, get Zenwalk http://www.zenwalk.org/ or Blag http://www.blagblagblag.org/.

Ubuntu 8.10 AMD64

Soooooo... Maybe I should try 8.04? And is there difference in stability when it comes to 32/64 bits?. I have 2 gigs of ram so there's probably no real need for 64, but I was thinking since I'm at it I might as well try it.

8.04 lts is alot faster IMO, not perfect but better. also i feel x86 for ubuntu is plenty enough, you really don't notice a performance increase with x64 anyways in linux, at least i haven't.

All the buntu's are just one big, bloated, fanboy wanna be Linux distros and have been since version 6.10!!

Gave up on that lousy thing a long time ago.

were not here to bash it by any means. i just feel more time should be focused on speed and performance issues. 8.10 from what ive read really didn't take off too well with linux fans.

overall it is still fun to play with on occasion. hopefully the next build will be better.

All the buntu's are just one big, bloated, fanboy wanna be Linux distros and have been since version 6.10!!

Gave up on that lousy thing a long time ago.

You want to use a REAL Linux distro that has all the codecs and stuff right out of the box and isn't so bloated and really works, get Zenwalk http://www.zenwalk.org/ or Blag http://www.blagblagblag.org/.

I don't want to use a REAL Linux distro, I want to use a n00b friendly distro that actually WORKS with wireless.

8.04 lts is alot faster IMO, not perfect but better. also i feel x86 for ubuntu is plenty enough, you really don't notice a performance increase with x64 anyways in linux, at least i haven't.

I might try it...

i may go back to xubuntu, ubuntu 8.10 is just crawling right now and this ends up happening every time for me.

Ubuntu feels heavy to me (as does Vista). I actually like Xubuntu (XFCE is my second favorite environment, Fluxbox is my first).

Ubuntu feels heavy to me (as does Vista). I actually like Xubuntu (XFCE is my second favorite environment, Fluxbox is my first).

i just don't get it man, i did no tweaks or anything other than disabling ipv6. with my specs it should be flying.

vista & windows 7 are much faster for some reason ? i posted my issues at the ubuntu forums too.

yeah that seems to be the overall concenous about 8.10. i dunno if i should even bother going back to 8.04. it really does get frustrating man.

It was enough to make me go back to Windows, dought I'll be trying Linux again for a very long time.

It was enough to make me go back to Windows, dought I'll be trying Linux again for a very long time.

honestly ive seen alot of statements like that on different forums lately.

i may try linux mint again, for some reason that seemed to be rock solid and function very well.

Well I have to say that I have 8.10 64 Bit Version running and it's flying! The only issue I have not yet sorted out is Exaile Music Player crashes and burns when I rescan my music folders! Other than that it's perfect and it fast and stable!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!