Vista SP2 and Server 2008 SP2 public betas arrive


Recommended Posts

In late October, Microsoft gave its beta testers the first beta build of Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. On Tuesday, the company pushed out a later build to MSDN and TechNet subscribers. The five languages currently supported are English, German, French, Spanish, and Japanese, in both 32- and 64-bit flavors. Today, the company has made this SP2 build available to the public on the Microsoft Download Center: for Vista and Server 2008 32-bit (388MB), for Vista and Server 2008 64-bit (614MB), and for Server 2008 ia64 (416MB).

The public beta release is available as part of a Customer Preview Program (CPP), which is aimed at technology enthusiasts, developers, and IT Pros who would like to test SP2 in their environments and with their applications prior to final release. Microsoft is recommending for the average customer to "wait until the final release prior to installing this service pack." Those interested in taking the plunge should be reminded that installing a pre-RTM build means that they will have to uninstall it before installing SP2 RTM; pre-RTM builds are not upgradeable. In fact, current testers with SP2 installed are getting this message through Windows Update (thanks Jared):

You are on a pre-release build of Windows Service Pack 2. Install this to start the uninstall process for that pre-release service. Once you start this, do not turn off or reboot your computer until asked. You will be offered a newer Service Pack 2 build after the uninstall completes. The new Service Pack 2 build may take some time before it is offered to you.

Full Story: http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft....ic-betas-arrive

I just used the Windows Update method for a 297mb Service Pack install.

Grab this http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en and remove the ".remove" from the file, double-click it and when next using Windows Update you get the 4mb Update Stack patch.

After that is installed use Windows Update again and you get the Service Pack Beta.

Very fast and no rebooting needed during the above steps. No watermark on the desktop and Windows Activation remains permanent.

I just used the Windows Update method for a 297mb Service Pack install.

Grab this http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en and remove the ".remove" from the file, double-click it and when next using Windows Update you get the 4mb Update Stack patch.

After initial installation and first boot you get no painted desktop.. (Watermark) On the second reboot the desktop gets painted.

For some reason I had a feeling that Microsoft would make 16497 (v.113) their public release. It's the same version that was released at the end of October. There's even a topic on it here at Neowin somewhere.

The batch file that was used to get the first pre-beta (v.105) also worked to get this one when it came out, as long as you uninstalled the previous version first.

And yes, there is a noticable improvement in speed over SP1, even though this is still a beta.

(The good thing about Microsoft using 16497 is that the watermark removal patch and patched uxtheme files will work from the first SP2 pre-beta release.)

Yes indeed, rebooted and saw the watermark. You still need this http://rapidshare.com/files/156710947/user32.dll.mui.html

It doesn't work on my Ultimate x64 SP2 install, it's not the first time I remove the evaluation message (done it on SP1 betas) I replaced in safe mode in both the en-US of system32 and SysWOW64 and ran the mcbuilder.exe (rebuild MUI cache), rebooted twice and still the message is there, I even used ResHack to ensure the files in the system dirs are correctly patched. Am I missing somethig? any x64 user having the same problem?

Meh, well Chrome is still in early beta. I'm waiting for a 1.0 release first. Of course, it's Google, so who knows if Chrome will ever come out of beta.

Same here, had to un-install it casuse it started crashing. Is there a single product, besides Search, that is out of Beta? Chrome was awesomely fast though.

Going to install this on my laptop. I tried it on my desktop and everything felt faster.

I had the leaked build installed on my rig and yesterday while I was checking WU, I first saw an uninstall tool for SP2 and I was like : "WTF ??" and, after a reboot, I saw the SP2 on WU and then I lol'ed :)

I tried installing this, but after it got to 100% (after rebooting), it failed and the changes were reverted. Once it rebooted again and brought me to my desktop, I got the following error: 0xc004f013. The only thing I could find out about this error is that SP1 failed for some users giving the same error, and the solution was to uninstall some buggy update.

Can anyone help me with this?

So those of you brave enough to install SP2 on Vista, have you noticed any improvements in performance, speed, etc? Give us your results.

I haven't noticed a difference at all, honestly. It's still a little early though.

It doesn't work on my Ultimate x64 SP2 install, it's not the first time I remove the evaluation message (done it on SP1 betas) I replaced in safe mode in both the en-US of system32 and SysWOW64 and ran the mcbuilder.exe (rebuild MUI cache), rebooted twice and still the message is there, I even used ResHack to ensure the files in the system dirs are correctly patched. Am I missing somethig? any x64 user having the same problem?

Well, few reboots during the day and it's removed now!

I forgot all about the CPP. Got it installing now but I'm wondering if we'll have to uninstall the Beta SP2 before final release or will we be able to install the final over top of the Beta?

You will need to uninstall any beta service pack before installing the final (or any new future beta's)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!