Vista SP2 and Server 2008 SP2 public betas arrive


Recommended Posts

In late October, Microsoft gave its beta testers the first beta build of Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. On Tuesday, the company pushed out a later build to MSDN and TechNet subscribers. The five languages currently supported are English, German, French, Spanish, and Japanese, in both 32- and 64-bit flavors. Today, the company has made this SP2 build available to the public on the Microsoft Download Center: for Vista and Server 2008 32-bit (388MB), for Vista and Server 2008 64-bit (614MB), and for Server 2008 ia64 (416MB).

The public beta release is available as part of a Customer Preview Program (CPP), which is aimed at technology enthusiasts, developers, and IT Pros who would like to test SP2 in their environments and with their applications prior to final release. Microsoft is recommending for the average customer to "wait until the final release prior to installing this service pack." Those interested in taking the plunge should be reminded that installing a pre-RTM build means that they will have to uninstall it before installing SP2 RTM; pre-RTM builds are not upgradeable. In fact, current testers with SP2 installed are getting this message through Windows Update (thanks Jared):

You are on a pre-release build of Windows Service Pack 2. Install this to start the uninstall process for that pre-release service. Once you start this, do not turn off or reboot your computer until asked. You will be offered a newer Service Pack 2 build after the uninstall completes. The new Service Pack 2 build may take some time before it is offered to you.

Full Story: http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft....ic-betas-arrive

I just used the Windows Update method for a 297mb Service Pack install.

Grab this http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en and remove the ".remove" from the file, double-click it and when next using Windows Update you get the 4mb Update Stack patch.

After that is installed use Windows Update again and you get the Service Pack Beta.

Very fast and no rebooting needed during the above steps. No watermark on the desktop and Windows Activation remains permanent.

I just used the Windows Update method for a 297mb Service Pack install.

Grab this http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en and remove the ".remove" from the file, double-click it and when next using Windows Update you get the 4mb Update Stack patch.

After initial installation and first boot you get no painted desktop.. (Watermark) On the second reboot the desktop gets painted.

For some reason I had a feeling that Microsoft would make 16497 (v.113) their public release. It's the same version that was released at the end of October. There's even a topic on it here at Neowin somewhere.

The batch file that was used to get the first pre-beta (v.105) also worked to get this one when it came out, as long as you uninstalled the previous version first.

And yes, there is a noticable improvement in speed over SP1, even though this is still a beta.

(The good thing about Microsoft using 16497 is that the watermark removal patch and patched uxtheme files will work from the first SP2 pre-beta release.)

Yes indeed, rebooted and saw the watermark. You still need this http://rapidshare.com/files/156710947/user32.dll.mui.html

It doesn't work on my Ultimate x64 SP2 install, it's not the first time I remove the evaluation message (done it on SP1 betas) I replaced in safe mode in both the en-US of system32 and SysWOW64 and ran the mcbuilder.exe (rebuild MUI cache), rebooted twice and still the message is there, I even used ResHack to ensure the files in the system dirs are correctly patched. Am I missing somethig? any x64 user having the same problem?

Meh, well Chrome is still in early beta. I'm waiting for a 1.0 release first. Of course, it's Google, so who knows if Chrome will ever come out of beta.

Same here, had to un-install it casuse it started crashing. Is there a single product, besides Search, that is out of Beta? Chrome was awesomely fast though.

Going to install this on my laptop. I tried it on my desktop and everything felt faster.

I had the leaked build installed on my rig and yesterday while I was checking WU, I first saw an uninstall tool for SP2 and I was like : "WTF ??" and, after a reboot, I saw the SP2 on WU and then I lol'ed :)

I tried installing this, but after it got to 100% (after rebooting), it failed and the changes were reverted. Once it rebooted again and brought me to my desktop, I got the following error: 0xc004f013. The only thing I could find out about this error is that SP1 failed for some users giving the same error, and the solution was to uninstall some buggy update.

Can anyone help me with this?

So those of you brave enough to install SP2 on Vista, have you noticed any improvements in performance, speed, etc? Give us your results.

I haven't noticed a difference at all, honestly. It's still a little early though.

It doesn't work on my Ultimate x64 SP2 install, it's not the first time I remove the evaluation message (done it on SP1 betas) I replaced in safe mode in both the en-US of system32 and SysWOW64 and ran the mcbuilder.exe (rebuild MUI cache), rebooted twice and still the message is there, I even used ResHack to ensure the files in the system dirs are correctly patched. Am I missing somethig? any x64 user having the same problem?

Well, few reboots during the day and it's removed now!

I forgot all about the CPP. Got it installing now but I'm wondering if we'll have to uninstall the Beta SP2 before final release or will we be able to install the final over top of the Beta?

You will need to uninstall any beta service pack before installing the final (or any new future beta's)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • https://www.tenforums.com/tuto...b-results-windows-10-a.html Check the comment dates. Some of them are as old as 2016.
    • I wonder how many are laid off for cost savings, and this being blamed on AI to make it sound less scary and bad, for a more positive "modern, with the times" spin for investors? Because Oracle is down 14% the past year. We're looking at a company struggling here. If AI would actually be working out so well for them that they can do massive layoffs, surely this would've been reflected the past year in their stock value?
    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!