Honda to quit F1 over financial crisis

By Denholm
in The Neobahn

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

Denholm

Posted
Posted

AFP

TOKYO (AFP) ? Honda said Friday that it was pulling out of Formula One due to the global financial crisis.b>

"Honda Motor Co. has come to the conclusion that we will withdraw from all Formula One activities, making 2008 the last season for participation," an emotional Honda Motor president Takeo Fukui told a press conference.

"This difficult decision has been made in light of the quickly deteriorating operating environment facing the global auto industry, brought on by the subprime problem in the United States, the deepening credit crisis and the sudden contraction of the world economies," he added.

Honda Motor also supplied engines and other technical support to Formula One team Super Aguri, which called it quits due to financial problems in May.

Grand Master

azz0r_wugg

Posted
Posted

I had ths weird dream last night, that I was in Asda buying presents and food...buying lots...then my mom rang me and said Asda-Tesco-HSBC and Natwest had gone under and to not buy what I'd got in my trolley because it'll be cheaper tomorrow.

Then they announced it over the tannoy that everyone working for Asda no longer has a job, and people just flooded out the doors.

Was so bizarre and real.

Veteran

tuckeratlarge

Posted
Posted

It's a pity for Honda. As for Rubens - retire already!

Jenson Button. Hmmmm, I always thought his ego outweighed his talent. He squandered his chances and with the Williams contract fiasco he is damaged goods. On the other hand, I hope he gets a drive just to see if he is crap or it was always the car.

Now that the habitual moaner Coulthard is out of the picture maybe it is time for Jenson to quit and go and do something else. Bring on the young talent that at least has a go and tries to overtake and the doesn't blame the car all the frigging time.

Grand Master

Martyn

Posted
Posted
It's a pity for Honda. As for Rubens - retire already!

Jenson Button. Hmmmm, I always thought his ego outweighed his talent. He squandered his chances and with the Williams contract fiasco he is damaged goods. On the other hand, I hope he gets a drive just to see if he is crap or it was always the car.

Now that the habitual moaner Coulthard is out of the picture maybe it is time for Jenson to quit and go and do something else. Bring on the young talent that at least has a go and tries to overtake and the doesn't blame the car all the frigging time.

Coulthard and Barrichello are legends mate!

Grand Master

revvo

Posted
Posted

The financial crisis is hurting everyone, including Acura which is their NA only brand. That on top of how lame the F1 became with their silly restrictions on car makers are good reasons to get out of the F1. If they do force the "same engine" bs next season, everyone will follow Ferrari's lead and leave at that moment.

This is the result of F1's silly regulations, getting out of the Canadian Grand Prix and the financial crisis where people think that NOT putting money into the economy will fix the economy.

Coulthard and Barrichello are legends mate!

If they're legends, then Ayrton Senna was God. Scratch that out, he was an F1 God :p

Veteran

Pilsbury

Posted
Posted
Ayrton is definitely a legend in Formula One history, but if you put him against Hamilton in a race today, I'm sure the Brit would come out on top ;)

Then again I'm a huge Hamilton fan :laugh:

Even though he's won a driver's championship, Hamilton has none of the talent or drive that the likes of Senna or Schumacher had.

Grand Master

sn00pie

Posted
Posted
Yep, then it was Schumacher's time to dominate the next era with Hakkinen as his only worthy opponent.

Now the F1 is as boring as watching a game of bowling on a Sunday afternoon.

I'd disagree with that. The last race of this season was perhaps the greatest race I've ever seen. I was shocked at how Hamilton managed to win, and its quite obvious the F1 gods were on his side, but he was sliding all over the place on that last lap and he managed to keep the race alive.

Grand Master

theyarecomingforyou

Posted
Posted
Even though he's won a driver's championship, Hamilton has none of the talent or drive that the likes of Senna or Schumacher had.

Nonsense. He has already proved himself and has only just got started, something acknowledged by Schumacher. If you don't like the guy then that's fair enough but to say he has none of the talent of previous greats is patently untrue.

Jenson Button. Hmmmm, I always thought his ego outweighed his talent. He squandered his chances and with the Williams contract fiasco he is damaged goods. On the other hand, I hope he gets a drive just to see if he is crap or it was always the car.

Yeah. He's not a particularly good racer nor does he have a particularly appealing personality. I certainly don't wish him out of his job but it wouldn't be a great surprise to me if he's not picked up by another team.

Veteran

Pilsbury

Posted
Posted
Nonsense. He has already proved himself and has only just got started, something acknowledged by Schumacher. If you don't like the guy then that's fair enough but to say he has none of the talent of previous greats is patently untrue.

He hasn't only just started, he's been with McLaren for years, it's not as if he's just jumped into a Formula 1 car for the first time last year.

To say he's better than Senna is what is nonsense. He's yet to actually prove himself IMO. He's never driven anything other that one of the top F1 cars (and let's face it, given a McLaren or a Ferrari, most current F1 drivers would be up at the top end), and he hasn't put in any really spectacular drives to date IMO.

Examples of spectacular drives IMO are:

Schumacher, 1994 Spanish Grand Prix

Senna, 1988 Japanese Grand Prix

Fangio, 1957 German Grand Prix.

Those are all races where the driver in question excelled over the rest of the drivers or conditions.

I'll admit I don't like Hamilton as he's made the mistake of believing his own PR, and British drivers would appear to be the greatest in the world if you listen to F1 commentators from the UK. I'm also still not 100% convinced about the last lap of Brazil this season, but, that's another matter.

I'm not saying he's not a good driver, he is, like all the rest of the F1 drivers. He's just not worthy of being mentioned along with the great names like Fangio, Schumacher and Senna. Maybe he will be some day. Maybe he won't.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By ExecutiveFunction404 · Posted

      This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By excalpius · Posted

      The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds

      By wingliston · Posted

      Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build

      By LiLmEgZ · Posted

      Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!