IE under 70 percent, Firefox above 20 percent


Recommended Posts

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

kind of interesting to see chrome beating out opera, which has been around a while in comparison...

Similar to Vista, Opera never really caught on when it was released, it basically sucked back then. Due to that, it is not very popular now (similar to Vista) despite being the best browser around. :p

and chrome is very new while opera has been around for a little while so that shows that google chrome is growing way faster so opera will be gone soon enough.

I would gladly switch to Chrome (from Opera) if chrome was as good as Opera......as it stands, its roughly the same speed, but opera has tons more features. If chrome had a built-in email client that supports POP or IMAP, as well as mouse gestures and something similar to Opera's "Wand", I would probably switch, but seeing as it doesnt, I would pick Opera over chrome any day.

I doubt Opera will be gone anytime soon, they have been around since before most of the browsers in the list, yet, with such a small market share, they continue to stay in the game and continue to have (IMO) the best browser.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

That's definitively true! that's why I'm saying what I said. Microsoft Windows hold around 90% and the majority of users are not going to change for other browsers.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

Include a basic wizard that runs through an option install:

- Click to Install Firefox

- Click to Install Google Chrome

- Click to Install Opera

Easy as that! Or include the option during install when Windows is being installed.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

I find your statement very interesting. I too believe that most novice computer users do understand the word "Internet" more than other applications. Yeah I do think some people do not know what a "web browser" is. Those that are able to know what a "web browser" means will eventually get to know other browsers in that process. So having the word "Internet" as part of their browser name really help push IE's fame.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

That might be true, but that wasn't the point.

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

A large part of Firefox's appeal is not just performance and stability, but the plugins and customization options. Unless MS opens up IE the same way, IE will continue to lose marketshare. I can't get by without my Firefox plugins anymore. I can't look at a webpage without Adblock, Greasemonkey, and various other tools for searching or info management. Firefox is like the MS Office of the web browsers, while IE is still just a primitive browser that's a magnet for ads and spam. It's not even faster than Firefox anymore, so why bother unless your boss makes you use it?

On top of all this, Firefox can be used in a portable mode, if you don't want to install anything, or just have your settings without you where you go. MS just doesn't seem to understand that people don't want Steve Ballmer's nose in their business all the time.

evil_bill.jpg

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

...

Clearly IE is falling, and at a pretty good clip. Does this mean that the browser wars have really heated up again with half a dozen exciting and capable browsers all duking it out for the top spot? That's sure what it sounds like if you read the tech pundits, bloggers, and journalists. The storyline that seems to be central to all the reporting and discussion of the competitive landscape is that it's totally thriving with IE releasing new versions much more frequently but still losing ground to Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, and a handful of other challengers.

For a web developer, this makes perfect sense. People building web sites and web applications are looking at all the browsers hitting their properties and writing and optimizing for the top user agents they're seeing in their logs.

For bloggers, pundits, and journalists, the browser makers are pushing out new alphas and betas at such an amazing pace it feels like it's almost a daily event. Add to that the blow by blow coverage of the awesome battle for performance supremacy and Web standards support, and you've got a real hotbed of excitement.

But for regular people, I don't think any of this is registering at all. For most regular people, there are just two browsers, the one that came on their machine and Firefox.

What does this look like. Well, if you're on Windows, there's Internet Explorer (the default that came with your PC) and there's Firefox. If you're on Mac, there's Safari (the default that came with your Mac) and there's Firefox. One default and one alternative.

3085892273_613bca3068.jpg?v=03086729162_f34a22f3c7.jpg?v=0

That's not exactly an exciting, vibrant, and red-hot marketplace. Now, that's a whole lot better than it was just four or five years ago when there was really only one browser and that browser was completely stagnant. But when you look at this from the viewpoint of a regular person sitting down to her computer, it's far from ideal.

Clearly there's a huge advantage to shipping with the computer as the default browser. Four years of amazing grass-roots marketing and word-of-mouth outreach, combined with a world-class product has accomplished more than anyone in the early days of Mozilla and Firefox would dare to imagine, but we're in an uphill battle because we're fighting not just against the other browsers out there today, but against the growth of the internet itself in a market where every new computer comes with a bundled browser from the OS vendor.

This is not the healthy marketplace that many imagine it to be. This is not the level playing field that 1 billion (and growing) Internet users deserve.

...

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

Heh once Chrome gets extensions it will beat Firefox. I've been using FF for years now, but once I started using Chrome I got used to it very quickly. It is much more responsive than FF, and other than a few bugs in this beta it's my new default browser

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

That is exactly why Chrome will step up a lot. Google has the power to put it into the conciousness of the masses. Remember, many computer novices only know about IE, but just everyone both novices and experts, know how to use Google.

Once Chrome gets extensions, you'll see it become Number 2 on that pie chart.

Why? Hmm.. For tab isolation alone? Because the soon upcoming Firefox 3.1 has one mighty Javascript engine in TraceMonkey, it puts up a good fight with V8. And jeez, is it noticeable when you use Firefox 3.1 Beta 2. :s (Beta 1 didn't have it activated)

V8 is a new engine, but it's only claim to fame is that it was faster than other engines, it's not any more.

And a separate process for each tab is a great idea, but I don't think it's as important as it's made out to be (I'd take a nice session restore over a method that increases overhead)

Exactly -- tab isolation is no magic bullet. It increases RAM usage a lot over time if you use to have, say, 10+ tabs open, and if you have a good session restoration mechanism, I don't see a big deal, in the case of rare browser crashes. It can definitely be debated whether adding a higher resource load for a low risk scenario that can be mitigated reasonably well in Firefox too is a good idea, and I definitely don't think that feature alone is a major benefit for Chrome.

Which just goes to provide further evidence that the quality of the browser is not at all related to its popularity.

Funny man. IE comes on every computer and it's called "INTERNET EXPLORER". Of course it will always be more popular than Firefox which users have to download and install. The only way Firefox will beat IE is if it's installed on every PC like Netscape Navigator used to be.

I'm surprised Chrome usage is above Opera's, given how new it is.

Haavard of Opera Software has some food for thought on this topic:

Source

Now that Google have announced that Chrome has reached 10 million users worldwide and our quarterly reports report the number of active Opera desktop users, we can actually compare these numbers to various browser stats.

Since I've been writing a lot about Net Applications lately, let's take a look at how they are doing. According to them, Opera's market share is 0.71%, and Chrome is at 0.83% for November.

If the numbers reported by Chrome and ourselves are accurate, Opera has three times more users than Google worldwide. However, Net Applications reports that Chrome actually has a higher market share.

Food for thought.

Congratulations to Google, by the way, for the official release of Chrome!

(emphasis mine)

FYI, Opera doesn't try to track their number of users based on downloads. They track it based on the internal update feature of Opera.

So it is a thought. If there are approximately 30 million active Opera users and only 10 million Chrome users, then tell us NetApps how could Chrome have a higher market share?

Further proof that these statistics mean crap all.

you'll find IE will always be the number 1 i think. the fact it comes with windows pretty much guarantees that'll command the lions share of the market. but more and more people are finding out about other browsers and are beginning to use them. that said i think the figures will start to level off soon. IE will probably end up with about 50-55% of the market and the remaining 50% or so will be shared out amongst the likes of firefox, chrome, opera and all the other really minor browsers.

for web designers this would be a problem but luckily IE6 is starting to fade out and IE7/IE8 seem to be a lot easier to work with. i've found i often have to make no alterations any more which is a good time saver

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!