IE under 70 percent, Firefox above 20 percent


Recommended Posts

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

kind of interesting to see chrome beating out opera, which has been around a while in comparison...

Similar to Vista, Opera never really caught on when it was released, it basically sucked back then. Due to that, it is not very popular now (similar to Vista) despite being the best browser around. :p

and chrome is very new while opera has been around for a little while so that shows that google chrome is growing way faster so opera will be gone soon enough.

I would gladly switch to Chrome (from Opera) if chrome was as good as Opera......as it stands, its roughly the same speed, but opera has tons more features. If chrome had a built-in email client that supports POP or IMAP, as well as mouse gestures and something similar to Opera's "Wand", I would probably switch, but seeing as it doesnt, I would pick Opera over chrome any day.

I doubt Opera will be gone anytime soon, they have been around since before most of the browsers in the list, yet, with such a small market share, they continue to stay in the game and continue to have (IMO) the best browser.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

That's definitively true! that's why I'm saying what I said. Microsoft Windows hold around 90% and the majority of users are not going to change for other browsers.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

Include a basic wizard that runs through an option install:

- Click to Install Firefox

- Click to Install Google Chrome

- Click to Install Opera

Easy as that! Or include the option during install when Windows is being installed.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

I find your statement very interesting. I too believe that most novice computer users do understand the word "Internet" more than other applications. Yeah I do think some people do not know what a "web browser" is. Those that are able to know what a "web browser" means will eventually get to know other browsers in that process. So having the word "Internet" as part of their browser name really help push IE's fame.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

That might be true, but that wasn't the point.

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

A large part of Firefox's appeal is not just performance and stability, but the plugins and customization options. Unless MS opens up IE the same way, IE will continue to lose marketshare. I can't get by without my Firefox plugins anymore. I can't look at a webpage without Adblock, Greasemonkey, and various other tools for searching or info management. Firefox is like the MS Office of the web browsers, while IE is still just a primitive browser that's a magnet for ads and spam. It's not even faster than Firefox anymore, so why bother unless your boss makes you use it?

On top of all this, Firefox can be used in a portable mode, if you don't want to install anything, or just have your settings without you where you go. MS just doesn't seem to understand that people don't want Steve Ballmer's nose in their business all the time.

evil_bill.jpg

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

...

Clearly IE is falling, and at a pretty good clip. Does this mean that the browser wars have really heated up again with half a dozen exciting and capable browsers all duking it out for the top spot? That's sure what it sounds like if you read the tech pundits, bloggers, and journalists. The storyline that seems to be central to all the reporting and discussion of the competitive landscape is that it's totally thriving with IE releasing new versions much more frequently but still losing ground to Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, and a handful of other challengers.

For a web developer, this makes perfect sense. People building web sites and web applications are looking at all the browsers hitting their properties and writing and optimizing for the top user agents they're seeing in their logs.

For bloggers, pundits, and journalists, the browser makers are pushing out new alphas and betas at such an amazing pace it feels like it's almost a daily event. Add to that the blow by blow coverage of the awesome battle for performance supremacy and Web standards support, and you've got a real hotbed of excitement.

But for regular people, I don't think any of this is registering at all. For most regular people, there are just two browsers, the one that came on their machine and Firefox.

What does this look like. Well, if you're on Windows, there's Internet Explorer (the default that came with your PC) and there's Firefox. If you're on Mac, there's Safari (the default that came with your Mac) and there's Firefox. One default and one alternative.

3085892273_613bca3068.jpg?v=03086729162_f34a22f3c7.jpg?v=0

That's not exactly an exciting, vibrant, and red-hot marketplace. Now, that's a whole lot better than it was just four or five years ago when there was really only one browser and that browser was completely stagnant. But when you look at this from the viewpoint of a regular person sitting down to her computer, it's far from ideal.

Clearly there's a huge advantage to shipping with the computer as the default browser. Four years of amazing grass-roots marketing and word-of-mouth outreach, combined with a world-class product has accomplished more than anyone in the early days of Mozilla and Firefox would dare to imagine, but we're in an uphill battle because we're fighting not just against the other browsers out there today, but against the growth of the internet itself in a market where every new computer comes with a bundled browser from the OS vendor.

This is not the healthy marketplace that many imagine it to be. This is not the level playing field that 1 billion (and growing) Internet users deserve.

...

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

Heh once Chrome gets extensions it will beat Firefox. I've been using FF for years now, but once I started using Chrome I got used to it very quickly. It is much more responsive than FF, and other than a few bugs in this beta it's my new default browser

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

That is exactly why Chrome will step up a lot. Google has the power to put it into the conciousness of the masses. Remember, many computer novices only know about IE, but just everyone both novices and experts, know how to use Google.

Once Chrome gets extensions, you'll see it become Number 2 on that pie chart.

Why? Hmm.. For tab isolation alone? Because the soon upcoming Firefox 3.1 has one mighty Javascript engine in TraceMonkey, it puts up a good fight with V8. And jeez, is it noticeable when you use Firefox 3.1 Beta 2. :s (Beta 1 didn't have it activated)

V8 is a new engine, but it's only claim to fame is that it was faster than other engines, it's not any more.

And a separate process for each tab is a great idea, but I don't think it's as important as it's made out to be (I'd take a nice session restore over a method that increases overhead)

Exactly -- tab isolation is no magic bullet. It increases RAM usage a lot over time if you use to have, say, 10+ tabs open, and if you have a good session restoration mechanism, I don't see a big deal, in the case of rare browser crashes. It can definitely be debated whether adding a higher resource load for a low risk scenario that can be mitigated reasonably well in Firefox too is a good idea, and I definitely don't think that feature alone is a major benefit for Chrome.

Which just goes to provide further evidence that the quality of the browser is not at all related to its popularity.

Funny man. IE comes on every computer and it's called "INTERNET EXPLORER". Of course it will always be more popular than Firefox which users have to download and install. The only way Firefox will beat IE is if it's installed on every PC like Netscape Navigator used to be.

I'm surprised Chrome usage is above Opera's, given how new it is.

Haavard of Opera Software has some food for thought on this topic:

Source

Now that Google have announced that Chrome has reached 10 million users worldwide and our quarterly reports report the number of active Opera desktop users, we can actually compare these numbers to various browser stats.

Since I've been writing a lot about Net Applications lately, let's take a look at how they are doing. According to them, Opera's market share is 0.71%, and Chrome is at 0.83% for November.

If the numbers reported by Chrome and ourselves are accurate, Opera has three times more users than Google worldwide. However, Net Applications reports that Chrome actually has a higher market share.

Food for thought.

Congratulations to Google, by the way, for the official release of Chrome!

(emphasis mine)

FYI, Opera doesn't try to track their number of users based on downloads. They track it based on the internal update feature of Opera.

So it is a thought. If there are approximately 30 million active Opera users and only 10 million Chrome users, then tell us NetApps how could Chrome have a higher market share?

Further proof that these statistics mean crap all.

you'll find IE will always be the number 1 i think. the fact it comes with windows pretty much guarantees that'll command the lions share of the market. but more and more people are finding out about other browsers and are beginning to use them. that said i think the figures will start to level off soon. IE will probably end up with about 50-55% of the market and the remaining 50% or so will be shared out amongst the likes of firefox, chrome, opera and all the other really minor browsers.

for web designers this would be a problem but luckily IE6 is starting to fade out and IE7/IE8 seem to be a lot easier to work with. i've found i often have to make no alterations any more which is a good time saver

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!