IE under 70 percent, Firefox above 20 percent


Recommended Posts

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

kind of interesting to see chrome beating out opera, which has been around a while in comparison...

Similar to Vista, Opera never really caught on when it was released, it basically sucked back then. Due to that, it is not very popular now (similar to Vista) despite being the best browser around. :p

and chrome is very new while opera has been around for a little while so that shows that google chrome is growing way faster so opera will be gone soon enough.

I would gladly switch to Chrome (from Opera) if chrome was as good as Opera......as it stands, its roughly the same speed, but opera has tons more features. If chrome had a built-in email client that supports POP or IMAP, as well as mouse gestures and something similar to Opera's "Wand", I would probably switch, but seeing as it doesnt, I would pick Opera over chrome any day.

I doubt Opera will be gone anytime soon, they have been around since before most of the browsers in the list, yet, with such a small market share, they continue to stay in the game and continue to have (IMO) the best browser.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

That's definitively true! that's why I'm saying what I said. Microsoft Windows hold around 90% and the majority of users are not going to change for other browsers.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

Include a basic wizard that runs through an option install:

- Click to Install Firefox

- Click to Install Google Chrome

- Click to Install Opera

Easy as that! Or include the option during install when Windows is being installed.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

IE wins because it has "Internet" in the name and comes as the default browser on most machines. That's a huge advantage considering a lot of users are incredibly clueless about computers and the web. A lot people call Internet Explorer simply "Internet" and cannot conceive that you can browse the web with some other program. In fact, I don't think they can clearly make the difference between a "program" and the "web".

Other browsers can improve all they want, like it or not, IE's dominance is here to stay.

I find your statement very interesting. I too believe that most novice computer users do understand the word "Internet" more than other applications. Yeah I do think some people do not know what a "web browser" is. Those that are able to know what a "web browser" means will eventually get to know other browsers in that process. So having the word "Internet" as part of their browser name really help push IE's fame.

It's always sad to see Opera so low. Been using it since 2003 and never looked back. I hope Opera 10 will increase it, but I doubt it.

People don't want that. There is a reason Windows is as popular as it is. Most user doesn't want to run a installation when they want to do something. The stupid EU crap about removing Windows Media Player is just stupid. No one wants a crippled version of Windows. Maybe the tech savvy yes, but not most users.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

A NOVICE computer users DO NOT KNOW HOW TO install the OS in the first place! So if Windows allows which choice of browser is installed, I don't think IE would have been the default choice for those that knows how to install the OS.

That might be true, but that wasn't the point.

More and more IE will loose shares, more and more MSFT will make it better.

Remember IE6, they didn't care about it because it was just too strong on the market.

Once they saw others getting stronger, they make a real HUGE step with IE7.

A large part of Firefox's appeal is not just performance and stability, but the plugins and customization options. Unless MS opens up IE the same way, IE will continue to lose marketshare. I can't get by without my Firefox plugins anymore. I can't look at a webpage without Adblock, Greasemonkey, and various other tools for searching or info management. Firefox is like the MS Office of the web browsers, while IE is still just a primitive browser that's a magnet for ads and spam. It's not even faster than Firefox anymore, so why bother unless your boss makes you use it?

On top of all this, Firefox can be used in a portable mode, if you don't want to install anything, or just have your settings without you where you go. MS just doesn't seem to understand that people don't want Steve Ballmer's nose in their business all the time.

evil_bill.jpg

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

...

Clearly IE is falling, and at a pretty good clip. Does this mean that the browser wars have really heated up again with half a dozen exciting and capable browsers all duking it out for the top spot? That's sure what it sounds like if you read the tech pundits, bloggers, and journalists. The storyline that seems to be central to all the reporting and discussion of the competitive landscape is that it's totally thriving with IE releasing new versions much more frequently but still losing ground to Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, and a handful of other challengers.

For a web developer, this makes perfect sense. People building web sites and web applications are looking at all the browsers hitting their properties and writing and optimizing for the top user agents they're seeing in their logs.

For bloggers, pundits, and journalists, the browser makers are pushing out new alphas and betas at such an amazing pace it feels like it's almost a daily event. Add to that the blow by blow coverage of the awesome battle for performance supremacy and Web standards support, and you've got a real hotbed of excitement.

But for regular people, I don't think any of this is registering at all. For most regular people, there are just two browsers, the one that came on their machine and Firefox.

What does this look like. Well, if you're on Windows, there's Internet Explorer (the default that came with your PC) and there's Firefox. If you're on Mac, there's Safari (the default that came with your Mac) and there's Firefox. One default and one alternative.

3085892273_613bca3068.jpg?v=03086729162_f34a22f3c7.jpg?v=0

That's not exactly an exciting, vibrant, and red-hot marketplace. Now, that's a whole lot better than it was just four or five years ago when there was really only one browser and that browser was completely stagnant. But when you look at this from the viewpoint of a regular person sitting down to her computer, it's far from ideal.

Clearly there's a huge advantage to shipping with the computer as the default browser. Four years of amazing grass-roots marketing and word-of-mouth outreach, combined with a world-class product has accomplished more than anyone in the early days of Mozilla and Firefox would dare to imagine, but we're in an uphill battle because we're fighting not just against the other browsers out there today, but against the growth of the internet itself in a market where every new computer comes with a bundled browser from the OS vendor.

This is not the healthy marketplace that many imagine it to be. This is not the level playing field that 1 billion (and growing) Internet users deserve.

...

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

Heh once Chrome gets extensions it will beat Firefox. I've been using FF for years now, but once I started using Chrome I got used to it very quickly. It is much more responsive than FF, and other than a few bugs in this beta it's my new default browser

Asa Doltzer, commonly thought of as Mozilla's official troll, has an interesting take on all of this:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archive...t_share_by.html

Pretty interesting graphs and point, IMO.

That is exactly why Chrome will step up a lot. Google has the power to put it into the conciousness of the masses. Remember, many computer novices only know about IE, but just everyone both novices and experts, know how to use Google.

Once Chrome gets extensions, you'll see it become Number 2 on that pie chart.

Why? Hmm.. For tab isolation alone? Because the soon upcoming Firefox 3.1 has one mighty Javascript engine in TraceMonkey, it puts up a good fight with V8. And jeez, is it noticeable when you use Firefox 3.1 Beta 2. :s (Beta 1 didn't have it activated)

V8 is a new engine, but it's only claim to fame is that it was faster than other engines, it's not any more.

And a separate process for each tab is a great idea, but I don't think it's as important as it's made out to be (I'd take a nice session restore over a method that increases overhead)

Exactly -- tab isolation is no magic bullet. It increases RAM usage a lot over time if you use to have, say, 10+ tabs open, and if you have a good session restoration mechanism, I don't see a big deal, in the case of rare browser crashes. It can definitely be debated whether adding a higher resource load for a low risk scenario that can be mitigated reasonably well in Firefox too is a good idea, and I definitely don't think that feature alone is a major benefit for Chrome.

Which just goes to provide further evidence that the quality of the browser is not at all related to its popularity.

Funny man. IE comes on every computer and it's called "INTERNET EXPLORER". Of course it will always be more popular than Firefox which users have to download and install. The only way Firefox will beat IE is if it's installed on every PC like Netscape Navigator used to be.

I'm surprised Chrome usage is above Opera's, given how new it is.

Haavard of Opera Software has some food for thought on this topic:

Source

Now that Google have announced that Chrome has reached 10 million users worldwide and our quarterly reports report the number of active Opera desktop users, we can actually compare these numbers to various browser stats.

Since I've been writing a lot about Net Applications lately, let's take a look at how they are doing. According to them, Opera's market share is 0.71%, and Chrome is at 0.83% for November.

If the numbers reported by Chrome and ourselves are accurate, Opera has three times more users than Google worldwide. However, Net Applications reports that Chrome actually has a higher market share.

Food for thought.

Congratulations to Google, by the way, for the official release of Chrome!

(emphasis mine)

FYI, Opera doesn't try to track their number of users based on downloads. They track it based on the internal update feature of Opera.

So it is a thought. If there are approximately 30 million active Opera users and only 10 million Chrome users, then tell us NetApps how could Chrome have a higher market share?

Further proof that these statistics mean crap all.

you'll find IE will always be the number 1 i think. the fact it comes with windows pretty much guarantees that'll command the lions share of the market. but more and more people are finding out about other browsers and are beginning to use them. that said i think the figures will start to level off soon. IE will probably end up with about 50-55% of the market and the remaining 50% or so will be shared out amongst the likes of firefox, chrome, opera and all the other really minor browsers.

for web designers this would be a problem but luckily IE6 is starting to fade out and IE7/IE8 seem to be a lot easier to work with. i've found i often have to make no alterations any more which is a good time saver

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!