Old icons from windows 3.11 and 95 still on Windows 7!


Recommended Posts

Hello :)

After testing 2 builds from Windows 7, I'm still surprised to see so many legacy icons from windows 95, and guess what even windows 3.11 icons..

What is Microsoft team responsible for the icons doing? Sleeping? Don't care to check how the icons on the GUI looks?

Yes, icons is a small GUI piece.. They aren't important to OS stability or to get work done..

But from an aesthetic point of view, for me in IMHO they are very important, since with large and extra large icons views they look so ugly and old..

Here are some examples, that just browse windows 7 files and in 2 mouse clicks and you're there, there's no need to be a power user to find them...

post-1303-1228838333_thumb.png

post-1303-1228838389_thumb.png

post-1303-1228838407_thumb.png

post-1303-1228838574_thumb.png

post-1303-1228838918_thumb.png

Edited by Digitalfox
Hello :)

After testing 2 builds from Windows 7, I'm still surprised to see so many legacy icons from windows 95, and guess what even windows 3.11 icons..

What is Microsoft team responsible for the icons doing? Sleeping? Don't care to check how the icons on the GUI looks?

Yes, icons is a small GUI piece.. They aren't important to OS stability or to get work done..

But from an aesthetic point of view, for me in IMHO they are very important, since with large and extra large icons views they look so ugly and old..

Here are some examples, that just browse windows 7 files and in 2 mouse clicks and you're there, there's no need to be a power user to find them...

<snip>

<snip>

<snip>

<snip>

<snip>

I'm sure they have their own legitimate reasons. One example being that they didn't change the Fonts dialogue from XP/Vista from the 3.1 days due to potential compatibility issues.

And do you ever see those icons? Those aren't even apps you can just run, usually just things that are invisible in the background. I don't care if they replace those icons. Focusing on delivering all icons you see when using windows in a good resolution is more important I think.

And do you ever see those icons? Those aren't even apps you can just run, usually just things that are invisible in the background. I don't care if they replace those icons. Focusing on delivering all icons you see when using windows in a good resolution is more important I think.

agreed those processes are there because it's still the same Windows we've been using. I find it actually incredible that Windows has evolved the way it has without having to go through a rewrite. Although you could call going from DOS to NT a necessary transition.

The only icon out of those screenshots you posted that should be changed is the one in the Advanced Attributes dialog.

Changing the icon of, for instance, winhlp32 is useless... that format isn't supported anymore. Another example is grpconv - what's the point of updating a icon for a tool used to convert Windows 3.x program groups?

I hate old icons too, but here, I have to agree with Ambroos. Icons that aren't visible anywhere on the UI don't have to be replaced. Most of the files you show on those screenshots are either services or legacy applications (like winhlp32.exe).

Expert stuff like regedit don't need new icons - they need to be replaced with something totally new or just be left alone :)

And do you ever see those icons? Those aren't even apps you can just run, usually just things that are invisible in the background. I don't care if they replace those icons. Focusing on delivering all icons you see when using windows in a good resolution is more important I think.

Why are you defending them? Micro$oft isn't a one-man company with lack of resources.

Didn't everyone moan about those old icons in Vista?

Give us 100% price, we'll give you 95% of code you already own.

Meet the new bOSs, same as the old bOSs

I'm waiting for Win 8, where hopefully Microsoft does a rewrite of everything from the ground up.

And of course when Windows 8 comes out, and doesn't meet your high level of expectation, you will say "well, I'm waiting for Windows 9, because that is when they will get it right!"

And then when Windows 9 comes out, you will say "I'm just going to wait for Windows 10, because I'm sure that's the one to use!"

There are people that stuck with Windows 98 because XP just "wasn't right", or was too demanding on their system, or their favorite program didn't work.

A lot of people have been sticking with the ancient XP because they don't like Vista.

If you dislike Windows so much - realize it will never be perfect for you, and just move to Mac OS X or something.

Why are you defending them? Micro$oft isn't a one-man company with lack of resources.

Didn't everyone moan about those old icons in Vista?

Give us 100% price, we'll give you 95% of code you already own.

I'm not sure three or four icons you will practically never see is a huge deal. Should they be updated? Yes, but it's really nothing to throw a fit over. That last comment is just plain silly. OS's aren't rewritten from the ground up :rolleyes:

Even though I'm sure a lot of power users and sticklers (including myself) would like to see a polished %Windir%, it's really grasping at straws right now. It's too early to start complaining about these minor details.

There have been some icon updates in other small dialogs, and such. So, best to wait and see.

This comes up with every release of Windows.

They most likely have their reasons - or quite simply can't be bothered to change them. I'd personally rather they spent an extra hour optimizing some other code than designing/changing icons that you never see.

They will never get rid of them because every iteration since 3.1 has been built on the same pile of code that exists today.

I wish they started fresh with Windows 7 but unfortunately they have not.

:no: as a software developer you should know better than following the sheep and repeating that same old tune

These icons are from legacy applications that are still bundled with Windows to ensure that very old applications still work.

winhlp32.exe is there for the few applications that still use .hlp format.

Do you want a bigger trip down to memory lane? Look in C:\Windows\System32 for moricons.dll and look into the icons resources.

And yes, Microsoft did not update them. There are still there for the few people who are acustomed to them and it's good. It's even better that Microsoft concentrate their resources on development that will impact the majority of Windows user: just for one example, the taskbar.

Frankly, I wish Microsoft would lock down C:\Windows\System32 and C:\Windows\SysWow64 for only the usage of the system and may be the installer service. This is the OS private reserve. No human are supposed to go there.

The only icon out of those screenshots you posted that should be changed is the one in the Advanced Attributes dialog.

Changing the icon of, for instance, winhlp32 is useless... that format isn't supported anymore. Another example is grpconv - what's the point of updating a icon for a tool used to convert Windows 3.x program groups?

Somewhat off-topic, but why even include something like grpconv in the first place anymore? It's just clutter these days, right?

Somewhat off-topic, but why even include something like grpconv in the first place anymore? It's just clutter these days, right?

The only case grpconv.exe would be needed if someone would install a Windows 3.1 application which installs a grp for the Program Manager progman.exe for which the grp file must be converted to Folders/Shortcuts in the Start menu.

I honestly have no clue on how many times a day this feature is needed today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!