Old icons from windows 3.11 and 95 still on Windows 7!


Recommended Posts

Who cares:p speed and stability is whats important. Who cares if some service exe-file has an old icon, or a never/seldom used dialog has an old icon.

I'll join you, if we bundle our networking cards to use the same ip, we'll get double the strength ;)

Bahaha...that's great. Best post I've seen all day (including the "I wish I could punch someone in the throat via tcp/ip" comment)

Lol.

Somewhat off-topic, but why even include something like grpconv in the first place anymore? It's just clutter these days, right?

I was thinking the same thing. Upgrading from Windows 3.1 (the only point of grpconv) hasn't been supported for quite some time now.

One word.. Beta.

That's what people said when the old font dialog box was discovered in Vista betas.

That's what people said when the old font dialog box was discovered in Vista betas.

you mean the deprecated font dialog, only left there for the peopl who are stuck in th past and can't figure out the advanced feature o drag and drop or simply, right clicking...

you mean the deprecated font dialog, only left there for the peopl who are stuck in th past and can't figure out the advanced feature o drag and drop or simply, right clicking...

I guess those people have figured it out by now, as that dialog box has finally been removed entirely from Windows 7.

WHY is that even IN Windows 7? Seriously. I know Microsoft is obsessive compulsive about backwards compatibility, but they should really take stuff like that out.
It's not really harming you, and it is helping provide support for waaaay old applications that otherwise wouldn't function fully.

To put it another way: don't be compulsive about cutting stuff when it means that as a side effect you'll wind up breaking someone by your action that would have been fine by your inaction. :)

Again, pick and choose your battles. :)

I'm waiting for Win 8, where hopefully Microsoft does a rewrite of everything from the ground up.

then prepare to be disappointed

I wish they started fresh with Windows 7 but unfortunately they have not.

fortunately they haven't not , enough of breaking stuffs

I do not care what the Icons look like as long as Microsoft comes out with a reliable, fast, inexpensive OS.

+1

Well it's not surprising. MS is very big on preserving backward compatibility.

I'm not sure it's a good idea, but if it doesn't mess with the user experience, then fair enough.

well your post are'nt surprising either :rolleyes:

Some of you fail to realize why they include those low resolution Icons... SAFE MODE -- And Fall back 8bit or 16 bit driver--VGA Compatible Mode- Now granted some of those programs are no longer in use. Now before you go and argue-- OH MY COMPUTER DOES FINE IN SAFE MODE and does 16bit or 32 bit Color in Safe Mode.

Let us say that all video cards have to be VGA Compatible- But just as an example-- NEOWIN decides to start making their own video cards- NEOWIN ULTRA FANCY CARD--- Now this card is VGA Compatible-but did not make it in the lineup to include a driver built into windows... So what does windows do with it since you would not be able to see the icons because they have too much color- So they include the Low Resolution Icons so you can get to where you can install your new NEOWIN Video card drivers ... Just an example that many of you who say get rid of them should know--

But I do agree though some can be removed-- But then again most of those small ones takes less than 1mb for the whole .dll file or Icon file.

Edited by redvamp128
Every time I see one of these stupid threads, I honestly wish I could punch someone in the throat via tcp/ip. Seriously.

LOL... Nice one :)

Yeah it's pointed at me, but nonetheless is a good joke, we all should have a good sense of humor if we are to accept other people comments on a topic of ours, so again nice one :)

But I would like to say this..

I like Windows 7, I really do..

It's very stable for a pre Beta OS, and have some small but awesome new features, So I'm going to buy Windows 7 if it keeps this way until RC..

My point is that some legacy stuff just looks bad and ugly on a modern OS like Windows 7 and it's high resolution icons..

If it can't be fixed or changed, I'm not going to give a bad name to 7 because of it, I already have made some people have a look at windows 7 and they loved it..

I just wanted to see more windows 95 stuff removed from Windows 7, but I also understand the compatibility problem that may bring some remove of old files..

Edited by Digitalfox
Changing the icon of, for instance, winhlp32 is useless... that format isn't supported anymore. Another example is grpconv - what's the point of updating a icon for a tool used to convert Windows 3.x program groups?

I'm one who hates inconsistency and despises it every time I see an old icon or an inconsistent UI element in any program, not just Windows. I always thought these icons needed changing. However, after reading some of these posts and seeing Brandon Live's comment, I understand now why they will never get updated and that it would be a waste of time when there are bigger fish to fry.

Wouldn't they be able to remove the code which relates to these legacy, now redundant, applications and just remove them completely?

It would be amazing to see proper new icons for them all, but like many have said, they are hardly ever seen and Microsoft have more important work to do.

I'd love to see RegEdit's icon updated though ;) Let's face it, most technology enthusiasts / programmers may use it frequently :D

That's what people said when the old font dialog box was discovered in Vista betas.

Well the font folder has been given a nice facelift, and you finally get font previews in its thumbnails. (Did they use DirectWrite to render those?)

Well it's not surprising. MS is very big on preserving backward compatibility.

I'm not sure it's a good idea, but if it doesn't mess with the user experience, then fair enough.

I would be satisfied if they update all the icons everyday users, plus power users, encounter on a daily basis. That Advanced Attributes dialog is one example, regedit is another example, some of the toolbar icons in certain MMC snapins are another example, etc.

@Panda X: Which icons? I thought most of the really high res icons are in imageres.dll

Well the font folder has been given a nice facelift, and you finally get font previews in its thumbnails. (Did they use DirectWrite to render those?)

I would be satisfied if they update all the icons everyday users, plus power users, encounter on a daily basis. That Advanced Attributes dialog is one example, regedit is another example, some of the toolbar icons in certain MMC snapins are another example, etc.

@Panda X: Which icons? I thought most of the really high res icons are in imageres.dll

The outdated icons are in moricons.dll. The high-res are still in imageres.dll

It's not really harming you, and it is helping provide support for waaaay old applications that otherwise wouldn't function fully.

To put it another way: don't be compulsive about cutting stuff when it means that as a side effect you'll wind up breaking someone by your action that would have been fine by your inaction. :)

Again, pick and choose your battles. :)

I figure if you're one of the 5 people whose life depends on running Windows 3.1 apps on their dekstop, Windows 7 probably isn't for you. You can maintain an old WinXP box, or even run a VM. If you complain that Windows XP won't be supported anymore, I will point out that their Win3.1 software probably hasn't been supported for years either.

Anything pre-95 should honestly be pulled out of the OS and buried. It would remove clutter and complexity that really shouldn't be there, and improve the OS for the 99.999% of the users that don't have any use whatsoever for Win3.1.

At what point would you move-on, anyway? Should Win3.1 still be supported by the core OS in 2015? 2025? 2050?

I figure if you're one of the 5 people whose life depends on running Windows 3.1 apps on their dekstop, Windows 7 probably isn't for you. You can maintain an old WinXP box, or even run a VM. If you complain that Windows XP won't be supported anymore, I will point out that their Win3.1 software probably hasn't been supported for years either.

There are plenty of venerable and RELIABLE banking or medical applications that have been designed decades ago and are still happily running today.

When I see my bank account manager, he uses some sort of Borland C++ 3.1 built application on top of a desktop running XP

Anything pre-95 should honestly be pulled out of the OS and buried. It would remove clutter and complexity that really shouldn't be there, and improve the OS for the 99.999% of the users that don't have any use whatsoever for Win3.1.

Let's take an example: let's remove grpconv.exe: One 20 Kb executable in C:\Windows\System32 and two keys in the registry base (.Grp and MSProgramgroup) to be removed.

I don't know the Windows Team development procedures at Microsoft but my guess is that

* a Change Request must be defined,

* assigned to a Developer by a Product Manager.

* The Developer does his job,

* then ask for a Code Review for the Validation of his changes

* and finally commits the changes to the Windows Source Code to be taken into account by the next build.

* let's not forget that the QA team must validate the changes according to the specifications defined in the Change Request.

All in all, let's say it will take half-a-day for the whole procedure for a 20 KB economy.

I would say that the bang for the buck ratio is abysmally close to 0 and that half-day should be used for something more usefull ...

At what point would you move-on, anyway? Should Win3.1 still be supported by the core OS in 2015? 2025? 2050?

Funny, the end of the support of Windows 3.1 as an embedded operating system was only one month ago.

it was even on the front news page.

Another article of the BBC about the usage of Windows 3.1 as embedded system

If you dislike Windows so much - realize it will never be perfect for you, and just move to Mac OS X or something.

Actually I've already got a Ubuntu box up and running :)

It's not that I dislike Windows, I dislike particular versions of Windows (ME, Vista)

The first computer I can remember other than the commodore 64 was a Win 95, replaced by Win ME. Win ME made anything look good (welcomed XP)

With junk like Vista, I figured it'd make Windows 7 be welcomed/look good, but upon further examination this doesn't seem so. I'm sticking with XP until I can't upgrade the hardware any further because drivers aren't available

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!