Old icons from windows 3.11 and 95 still on Windows 7!


Recommended Posts

There are plenty of venerable and RELIABLE banking or medical applications that have been designed decades ago and are still happily running today.

When I see my bank account manager, he uses some sort of Borland C++ 3.1 built application on top of a desktop running XP

As I said: Why can he not keep running XP for his legacy apps? It's "reliable" too, and if he's still happy with his reliable decades old apps, that's reason enough to not get rid of XP. Even if his IT department forces him into a new Windows 7 desktop, virtual machines are a readily-available and good solution. (Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.)

Let's take an example: let's remove grpconv.exe: One 20 Kb executable in C:\Windows\System32 and two keys in the registry base (.Grp and MSProgramgroup) to be removed.

I don't know the Windows Team development procedures at Microsoft but my guess is that

* a Change Request must be defined,

* assigned to a Developer by a Product Manager.

* The Developer does his job,

* then ask for a Code Review for the Validation of his changes

* and finally commits the changes to the Windows Source Code to be taken into account by the next build.

* let's not forget that the QA team must validate the changes according to the specifications defined in the Change Request.

All in all, let's say it will take half-a-day for the whole procedure for a 20 KB economy.

I would say that the bang for the buck ratio is abysmally close to 0 and that half-day should be used for something more usefull ...

That sounds like a procedure for a small project, not an organized OS-level project. I'm certain they can streamline the procedure, especially if they have a small team dedicated to hunting down any Win16 bits. Plus, it's not just 20kb we're talking about saving. This is about reducing the overall complexity of the OS. One less bit in there is one less bit that can cause a problem.

You've gotta clear out the garage before something falls on your head, basically.

Funny, the end of the support of Windows 3.1 as an embedded operating system was only one month ago.

I'm talking about the core (current) OS supporting Win3.1 apps, not a specific release of Windows.

Win3.1 is 16bit, and as far as I know the 64bit edition of Vista/7 doesn't even support anything 16bit anymore... Or am I wrong?

Windows x64 doesn't support 16-bit programs, but Win32s was released for Win3.11 so you can't make a blanket statement that all programs written for Win3.11 are 16 bit.

moricons.dll I would expect expands to "more icons", but is limited to the old DOS 8 character limit.

Thanks. I assumed that. At the time, I was just wondering why they would transfer them to moricons.dll instead of just getting rid of them (and the legacy programs which few people, if anyone, use), but now I understand that they do need to be there for compatibility issues :)

It's a shame they can't ever be updated though, it really does look horrible having those icons throughout Windows, especially when they do not work with "Large Icons" view :(

Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.

Apple's Classic VM was not exactly stable and reliable. However, seamless VM's today are reliable and have good enough performance.

It does appear that MS is moving in that direction with support for VHD's... :shiftyninja:

I'm in the party which says that MS should update all icons. I'm a bit compulsive about that.

However, this isn't a perfect world, and MS isn't a perfect company, so to expect that may be overkill. My feeling is that MS may update more icons, but that a few will be left behind. The ones left behind, however, probably will be ones we'll never see unless we actually take the incentive to go to the WINDOWS or SYSTEM32 folders.

I do hope they will finally update the "Pick color" and "Pick font" dialogs (the "pick fonts" dialog can be found in Wordpad).

Welcome to a PRE BETA! You expect it to be finished?

More like welcome to Windows, every version of Windows has contained "artifacts" from previous Windows versions. I remember the big stink people kicked up when they discovered Win3.11/9x/2k/XP icons in Vista :p it's a fact of life with Windows.

What I find interesting is that if we actually got rid of all the "CLUTTER" the old Icons would amount to would be a staggering 2 Floppy Disks worth. 1.44 + 1.44 Mb. :yes: So no real gain there and the majority of users do not even see those. I can see however updating certain Icons for the new OS. (the Security Center). But then again -- This is not even in Beta Yet. -- So still an unfinished project. Though I am sure Microsoft has a few builds higher than what we see on this end running that are more polished.-- We should not really be concerned with aesthetics of the OS until RC2. That is when we should start complain about the look of the OS.

(Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.)

How do you think Win9x and DOS programs run on Windows XP/Vista/7? They run in a seamless VM! It's so seamless you didn't even know it was there :)

How do you think Win9x and DOS programs run on Windows XP/Vista/7? They run in a seamless VM! It's so seamless you didn't even know it was there :)

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

I hope they update the look of Win7 quite a bit before release, I'm kinda thinking they will, seeing as they work on the superficial stuff late in development.

Regarding the icons, I think they're all terrible TBH. Both Vista and whatever Win7 has now.

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

Well not everything runs a full VM (DOS / 16-bit apps do), and they all have access to the real file system. Doing more work on that compatibility layer just isn't worth the effort... it works, and eventually it'll be removed. Heck, on 64-bit versions of Windows the 16-bit support has been removed.

But my understanding is that things like progman.exe and whatever are generally there for apps that check for their existence, often in their setup programs and such. I'm sure at some point more stuff will be cut out that isn't needed, but it's very hard to prove that something is safe to remove without breaking all sorts of in-house business applications, scripts, etc.

I hope they update the look of Win7 quite a bit before release, I'm kinda thinking they will, seeing as they work on the superficial stuff late in development.

Regarding the icons, I think they're all terrible TBH. Both Vista and whatever Win7 has now.

Then go design better ones and then share them with all of us.

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

There are actually thousands of modern programs that use legacy APIs (even ones only intended for 16-bit compatibility). Sometimes because it's how the programmer is used to doing it, and sometimes because it's the first result he found on some random internet search. There's no clear separation between what is legacy stuff and what is current, and every possible part of the system is used and abused in some way by software out there.

And also, it's easy to say that people who need older programs should just keep running Windows 95 or XP or whatever, but those operating systems eventually become unsupported by both Microsoft and hardware manufacturers. What do you do when the computer breaks? There are also a lot of people who want to run their older programs and, say, a recent version of Office side-by-side on the same machine.

They could of course find modern software to switch to, but that means time and money spent on retraining and moving legacy data over (if even possible). In a worst case scenario, the problems and lost productivity from doing so could mean bankruptcy.

Microsoft wants to cater for these customers as much as possible.

That sounds like a procedure for a small project, not an organized OS-level project. I'm certain they can streamline the procedure, especially if they have a small team dedicated to hunting down any Win16 bits.

Wait, you think things go faster in larger projects? You're obviously not very familiar with how software development works :) And a team dedicated to "hunting down Win16 bits" sounds like a terrible waste.

Plus, it's not just 20kb we're talking about saving. This is about reducing the overall complexity of the OS. One less bit in there is one less bit that can cause a problem.

Err, depositing a stub file like grpconv.exe in the system directory doesn't add to OS complexity in any way.

not exactly a big deal but it wouldn't take long to update them. even if it was just so it a) looked nicer, b) provided a consistent look, c) was a little bit more "perfect" overall.

You're missing the point. Nobody will ever see them. Why give a pretty icon to an application that nobody will ever see?

I'm not sure three or four icons you will practically never see is a huge deal. Should they be updated? Yes, but it's really nothing to throw a fit over. That last comment is just plain silly. OS's aren't rewritten from the ground up :rolleyes:

I think it is a symptom of a larger problem - Microsoft unwilling to clear the crap off Windows.

All of the above shouldn't exist; when it doubt - tear it out.

I think it is a symptom of a larger problem - Microsoft unwilling to clear the crap off Windows.

All of the above shouldn't exist; when it doubt - tear it out.

But Microsoft isn't in doubt. Have you even read this topic? All those old icons and whatnot are not "crap." They are there so that old legacy programs continue to work on Windows. Unlike Apple, Microsoft doesn't just cut off support for old programs totally just because they feel like it. When you have millions and millions of customers, you have to expect that not everyone will upgrade to the latest and greatest right away.

But Microsoft isn't in doubt. Have you even read this topic? All those old icons and whatnot are not "crap." They are there so that old legacy programs continue to work on Windows. Unlike Apple, Microsoft doesn't just cut off support for old programs totally just because they feel like it. When you have millions and millions of customers, you have to expect that not everyone will upgrade to the latest and greatest right away.

I find it funny that the biggest customers, aka businesses, always seem to have money for big and lofty money wasters like 'retreats' and 'team building' but the money is distinctively missing when it comes to maintaining the IT infrastructure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!