Old icons from windows 3.11 and 95 still on Windows 7!


Recommended Posts

There are plenty of venerable and RELIABLE banking or medical applications that have been designed decades ago and are still happily running today.

When I see my bank account manager, he uses some sort of Borland C++ 3.1 built application on top of a desktop running XP

As I said: Why can he not keep running XP for his legacy apps? It's "reliable" too, and if he's still happy with his reliable decades old apps, that's reason enough to not get rid of XP. Even if his IT department forces him into a new Windows 7 desktop, virtual machines are a readily-available and good solution. (Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.)

Let's take an example: let's remove grpconv.exe: One 20 Kb executable in C:\Windows\System32 and two keys in the registry base (.Grp and MSProgramgroup) to be removed.

I don't know the Windows Team development procedures at Microsoft but my guess is that

* a Change Request must be defined,

* assigned to a Developer by a Product Manager.

* The Developer does his job,

* then ask for a Code Review for the Validation of his changes

* and finally commits the changes to the Windows Source Code to be taken into account by the next build.

* let's not forget that the QA team must validate the changes according to the specifications defined in the Change Request.

All in all, let's say it will take half-a-day for the whole procedure for a 20 KB economy.

I would say that the bang for the buck ratio is abysmally close to 0 and that half-day should be used for something more usefull ...

That sounds like a procedure for a small project, not an organized OS-level project. I'm certain they can streamline the procedure, especially if they have a small team dedicated to hunting down any Win16 bits. Plus, it's not just 20kb we're talking about saving. This is about reducing the overall complexity of the OS. One less bit in there is one less bit that can cause a problem.

You've gotta clear out the garage before something falls on your head, basically.

Funny, the end of the support of Windows 3.1 as an embedded operating system was only one month ago.

I'm talking about the core (current) OS supporting Win3.1 apps, not a specific release of Windows.

Win3.1 is 16bit, and as far as I know the 64bit edition of Vista/7 doesn't even support anything 16bit anymore... Or am I wrong?

Windows x64 doesn't support 16-bit programs, but Win32s was released for Win3.11 so you can't make a blanket statement that all programs written for Win3.11 are 16 bit.

moricons.dll I would expect expands to "more icons", but is limited to the old DOS 8 character limit.

Thanks. I assumed that. At the time, I was just wondering why they would transfer them to moricons.dll instead of just getting rid of them (and the legacy programs which few people, if anyone, use), but now I understand that they do need to be there for compatibility issues :)

It's a shame they can't ever be updated though, it really does look horrible having those icons throughout Windows, especially when they do not work with "Large Icons" view :(

Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.

Apple's Classic VM was not exactly stable and reliable. However, seamless VM's today are reliable and have good enough performance.

It does appear that MS is moving in that direction with support for VHD's... :shiftyninja:

I'm in the party which says that MS should update all icons. I'm a bit compulsive about that.

However, this isn't a perfect world, and MS isn't a perfect company, so to expect that may be overkill. My feeling is that MS may update more icons, but that a few will be left behind. The ones left behind, however, probably will be ones we'll never see unless we actually take the incentive to go to the WINDOWS or SYSTEM32 folders.

I do hope they will finally update the "Pick color" and "Pick font" dialogs (the "pick fonts" dialog can be found in Wordpad).

Welcome to a PRE BETA! You expect it to be finished?

More like welcome to Windows, every version of Windows has contained "artifacts" from previous Windows versions. I remember the big stink people kicked up when they discovered Win3.11/9x/2k/XP icons in Vista :p it's a fact of life with Windows.

What I find interesting is that if we actually got rid of all the "CLUTTER" the old Icons would amount to would be a staggering 2 Floppy Disks worth. 1.44 + 1.44 Mb. :yes: So no real gain there and the majority of users do not even see those. I can see however updating certain Icons for the new OS. (the Security Center). But then again -- This is not even in Beta Yet. -- So still an unfinished project. Though I am sure Microsoft has a few builds higher than what we see on this end running that are more polished.-- We should not really be concerned with aesthetics of the OS until RC2. That is when we should start complain about the look of the OS.

(Why Microsoft can't create a seamless VM for legacy apps like Apple did, I don't know.)

How do you think Win9x and DOS programs run on Windows XP/Vista/7? They run in a seamless VM! It's so seamless you didn't even know it was there :)

How do you think Win9x and DOS programs run on Windows XP/Vista/7? They run in a seamless VM! It's so seamless you didn't even know it was there :)

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

I hope they update the look of Win7 quite a bit before release, I'm kinda thinking they will, seeing as they work on the superficial stuff late in development.

Regarding the icons, I think they're all terrible TBH. Both Vista and whatever Win7 has now.

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

Well not everything runs a full VM (DOS / 16-bit apps do), and they all have access to the real file system. Doing more work on that compatibility layer just isn't worth the effort... it works, and eventually it'll be removed. Heck, on 64-bit versions of Windows the 16-bit support has been removed.

But my understanding is that things like progman.exe and whatever are generally there for apps that check for their existence, often in their setup programs and such. I'm sure at some point more stuff will be cut out that isn't needed, but it's very hard to prove that something is safe to remove without breaking all sorts of in-house business applications, scripts, etc.

I hope they update the look of Win7 quite a bit before release, I'm kinda thinking they will, seeing as they work on the superficial stuff late in development.

Regarding the icons, I think they're all terrible TBH. Both Vista and whatever Win7 has now.

Then go design better ones and then share them with all of us.

I always guessed it was something like that.. :)

But why not put all the 9x legacy stuff on a single file that is used by the seamless VM?

There are actually thousands of modern programs that use legacy APIs (even ones only intended for 16-bit compatibility). Sometimes because it's how the programmer is used to doing it, and sometimes because it's the first result he found on some random internet search. There's no clear separation between what is legacy stuff and what is current, and every possible part of the system is used and abused in some way by software out there.

And also, it's easy to say that people who need older programs should just keep running Windows 95 or XP or whatever, but those operating systems eventually become unsupported by both Microsoft and hardware manufacturers. What do you do when the computer breaks? There are also a lot of people who want to run their older programs and, say, a recent version of Office side-by-side on the same machine.

They could of course find modern software to switch to, but that means time and money spent on retraining and moving legacy data over (if even possible). In a worst case scenario, the problems and lost productivity from doing so could mean bankruptcy.

Microsoft wants to cater for these customers as much as possible.

That sounds like a procedure for a small project, not an organized OS-level project. I'm certain they can streamline the procedure, especially if they have a small team dedicated to hunting down any Win16 bits.

Wait, you think things go faster in larger projects? You're obviously not very familiar with how software development works :) And a team dedicated to "hunting down Win16 bits" sounds like a terrible waste.

Plus, it's not just 20kb we're talking about saving. This is about reducing the overall complexity of the OS. One less bit in there is one less bit that can cause a problem.

Err, depositing a stub file like grpconv.exe in the system directory doesn't add to OS complexity in any way.

not exactly a big deal but it wouldn't take long to update them. even if it was just so it a) looked nicer, b) provided a consistent look, c) was a little bit more "perfect" overall.

You're missing the point. Nobody will ever see them. Why give a pretty icon to an application that nobody will ever see?

I'm not sure three or four icons you will practically never see is a huge deal. Should they be updated? Yes, but it's really nothing to throw a fit over. That last comment is just plain silly. OS's aren't rewritten from the ground up :rolleyes:

I think it is a symptom of a larger problem - Microsoft unwilling to clear the crap off Windows.

All of the above shouldn't exist; when it doubt - tear it out.

I think it is a symptom of a larger problem - Microsoft unwilling to clear the crap off Windows.

All of the above shouldn't exist; when it doubt - tear it out.

But Microsoft isn't in doubt. Have you even read this topic? All those old icons and whatnot are not "crap." They are there so that old legacy programs continue to work on Windows. Unlike Apple, Microsoft doesn't just cut off support for old programs totally just because they feel like it. When you have millions and millions of customers, you have to expect that not everyone will upgrade to the latest and greatest right away.

But Microsoft isn't in doubt. Have you even read this topic? All those old icons and whatnot are not "crap." They are there so that old legacy programs continue to work on Windows. Unlike Apple, Microsoft doesn't just cut off support for old programs totally just because they feel like it. When you have millions and millions of customers, you have to expect that not everyone will upgrade to the latest and greatest right away.

I find it funny that the biggest customers, aka businesses, always seem to have money for big and lofty money wasters like 'retreats' and 'team building' but the money is distinctively missing when it comes to maintaining the IT infrastructure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!