Heroes Volume 4 : Fugitives


Recommended Posts

I'm still enjoying the show for now. I do wonder, what effect would Ando have on Peters modified power?

It would probably extend it further, so he can carry multiple abilities for the time being but thats just assumption really.

I say Peter himself doesn't Fully understand his new ability/abilities yet, and has get to be Re-trained like with Claude... I think.

Nope, he can only have one ability at a time. You saw Rappy's posting about Kring confirming that he has a new ability. He leeches powers, he's only used one at a time, and he's said so on the show. What more do ya need?

Nope, he can only have one ability at a time. You saw Rappy's posting about Kring confirming that he has a new ability. He leeches powers, he's only used one at a time, and he's said so on the show. What more do ya need?

He doesn't want to admit that I was right.

HOW long will you be right?

Comon, you honestly think Peter will have one power at a time, for the Rest of the season?

She and that black guy (Claude) was both in Max Payne too.

Claude? or do you mean Knox?

I gotta admit i don't really understand how he can now only hold one power, I can't recall any of the other "leech" characters having a limit on the powers they can absorb. I think they'll probably change it as he learns more about his new ability.

I thought that the whole idea was that each person's DNA unlocked a different power. So, once Peter stabbed himself with the power-medicine-thing, shouldn't it have unlocked the original power?

Lol, or something may be flawed, or something holding his potential back.

I thought that the whole idea was that each person's DNA unlocked a different power. So, once Peter stabbed himself with the power-medicine-thing, shouldn't it have unlocked the original power?

Lol, or something may be flawed, or something holding his potential back.

That's what a few of us have been saying. I bet the writer's have already conjured up a solution: leeching a leeching power! :no:

Yeah, I haven't read this for the past couple pages so if this had been stated I apologize.

I could definitely see him touching Syler and it unlocking multiple powers for him.

Also, I think the best thing to come out of Heroes in a long time is the Slyer storyline at the moment, I love how he's hunting down his father and I really like the angle with who I'm just going to start calling his apprentice.

What would happen if Peter took the Hunger?...he would want to kill and take powers and would he then lose the hunger once he took the power?

Good point!

He will get the ability to understand other people's abilities, and never touch a hero again.

He's gonna kill some bad guys just to feed his hunger.

Finally got some time off from studies to watch the episode in peace. Overall I thought this episode closed some lingering holes from last week's episode: Peter can only hold one power at a time (at least for now until he learns otherwise), Nathan is starting to have regrets on how the Hunter is pressuring him to take extreme action, Angela is not helping Nathan anymore and somehow has info on the Hunter.

Certainly noticed Rachel Mills at the very end and good to see she actually has an on-TV role. But, one thing I am still wondering is how she ended up working for Nathan after she was taken by Angela in the last webisode of The Recruit series?

Yeah the actual person who messaged her is called "Rebel"

Well, if you remember from the graphic novels, Hana Grittelman was actually sending wireless messages under the name of "Wireless". So in the same way, "Rebel" could very well just be a codename for whoever is trying to hide their identity and help gather the heroes.

Speaking of gathering heroes, anyone starting to see this having some resemblance to X-Men: The Last Stand? People with abilities versus the government, except different plot scenario and ideology.

This weeks episode was better than last weeks, but still below par for me.

People suggesting Micah as the text message person might be right, because the caller ID said something like Unknown (M) or something similar. It definitely had an M in it anyways.

Oh and about them needing money, Peter actually points out the fact they wont be able to use their credit cards and bank accounts.

The (M) could very well just stand for mobile. But then again, the only other character alive that we know has the power to communicate with technology is Micah. Guess we will just have to wait and see.

I may have missed this, but how does Luke know who Sylar's father is and where he is?

He lives near him so I suppose they might of been friends with him and knew where he was going to stay.

@revreddy yeah I think its because Rachel found out Angela was close to her mum and don't forget her mum isn't dead either.

He lives near him so I suppose they might of been friends with him and knew where he was going to stay.

@revreddy yeah I think its because Rachel found out Angela was close to her mum and don't forget her mum isn't dead either.

Right, they lived down the street from each other, but I don't recall any mention of him other than that and Luke knowing where he is. That just doesn't make any sense.

Right, they lived down the street from each other, but I don't recall any mention of him other than that and Luke knowing where he is. That just doesn't make any sense.

Well for some reason Sylar took the SWAT person and kept him hostage in a house near his fathers thinking that they would know the whereabouts and if they didn't he probably would killed them anyway.

Well for some reason Sylar took the SWAT person and kept him hostage in a house near his fathers thinking that they would know the whereabouts and if they didn't he probably would killed them anyway.

No, he didn't take the agent there because he thought they knew where his father was. He took him there to torture and kill the owners of the house in front of the agent. He tried to torture the agent but that didn't work. So he figured maybe he would talk if he saw other innocent people suffering.

No, he didn't take the agent there because he thought they knew where his father was. He took him there to torture and kill the owners of the house in front of the agent. He tried to torture the agent but that didn't work. So he figured maybe he would talk if he saw other innocent people suffering.

Oh yeah my mistake :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!