Study: iPhone keypad less efficient than physical QWERTY keypads


Recommended Posts

A recent usability study found that average cell phone users are far more efficient using physical QWERTY keypads to type messages than they are when using the virtual keypad included with Apple Inc.'s new iPhone.

Global consulting firm User Centric, which had previously identified texting as potentially problematic for iPhone customers, said it commissioned the new survey to determine just how easy it is for conventional mobile phone users to transition to text input via the Apple handset's touchscreen keypad.

For the the study, the firm brought in a total of 20 participants who said they sent text messages at least 15 times per week -- ten of the participants owned a phone with a QWERTY keypad, and ten of the participants owned a phone with a numeric keypad.

During each session, participants were required to use their own phones to copy 12 standard messages that had been created for the study. The participants, none of which had ever used an iPhone, were then provided with one of the Apple handsets and asked to repeat the task.

"In general, participants took longer to enter text messages on the iPhone than on their own phone," User Centric wrote in a summary of the study. "Despite the keyboard similarities, QWERTY phone users took nearly twice as long to enter comparable messages on the iPhone compared to their own phone."

Specifically, participants were asked to copy 12 standard messages, each of which was between 104-106 characters in length (including spaces). Six of the messages each contained 8-10 instances of proper capitalization and punctuation, while the remaining six messages contained no capitalization or punctuation but had some abbreviations.

Participants were given little time to familiarize themselves with the iPhone's touch keyboard ahead of the study and therefore their texting abilities were still at the novice level. Throughout the study, however, User Centric said there were some "limited improvements in keyboard comfort as users progressed through the tasks on the iPhone."

"Overall, the findings in the study can be taken as a good representation of what iPhone text messaging is like for a customer who has just bought an iPhone and is using it for the first time," said Gavin Lew, Managing Director at User Centric. "It's important to consider the changes a person has to make when they switch to the iPhone.

Some specific observations from the July study are listed below:

Detailed Observations of User Text Entry on the iPhone Ergonomic Issues

* Most participants felt that their fingertips were too large for the iPhone's touch keyboard.

* Most QWERTY phone users initially used the iPhone by holding it with both hands and typing with their two thumbs. However, by the end of the session, most had decided that it was easier for them to use one index finger to type.

* Over half of the participants stated that they would have preferred the feel of an actual key to the iPhone's touch keypad.

* Most participants noticed that there was no tactile feedback on the iPhone keypad.

* Some mentioned that the feel of the key on conventional phones helps them locate the desired key without having to focus on the actual keypad.

General Interface Issues

* Participants expressed a great deal of frustration with the sensitivity of the iPhone touch keypad.

* Participants made an average of 11 errors per message on the iPhone compared to an average of 3 errors per text message on their own phone. Although the error rate was alleviated somewhat by the iPhone's self-correction feature, participants were still frustrated.

* In particular, participants struggled when they were trying to type using the Q & W keys or the O & P keys on the iPhone.

* 5 out of 20 participants asked if the iPhone came with a stylus. They indicated that they could be more accurate with the stylus rather than their fingers due to the sensitivity of the screen.

* One female participant tried to interact with the iPhone keypad using her fingernail and was unsuccessful.

* The space bar, return, and backspace keys presented issues for many participants because these keys were spaced so closely to each other.

* No one discovered the drag and lift feature of the keyboard, which reduces errors.

* Many participants said they could not see themselves attempting text entry on the iPhone in distracting conditions.

* Specifically, participants did not think they could text message on the iPhone safely while driving.

Predictive & Corrective Text Issues

* Only a few participants discovered and correctly learned to use the predictive and/or corrective text features on the iPhone. QWERTY phone users in particular had a tendency to backspace when they were correcting mistakes.

* Participants did not understand how the predictive / corrective text bubbles worked.

* 6 out of 20 participants tried to touch the bubble to get the word in the text bubble to appear.

* Three participants tried hitting the backspace key because they associated the ‘x' on it with the ‘x' in the bubble.

* It was especially frustrating for participants when they attempted to place the cursor in the middle of a word.

* None of the participants discovered the magnifying glass feature while text messaging.

* During a follow-up task that involved correcting a note in the iPhone's Notes application, 6 out of 20 did discover the magnifying glass feature. However, not all participants realized that the feature helps place the cursor in addition to enlarging the text.

another reason why i didn't get the iphone, and got the t mobile G1 instead. :)

source

The participants, none of which had ever used an iPhone, were then provided with one of the Apple handsets and asked to repeat the task.

"In general, participants took longer to enter text messages on the iPhone than on their own phone," User Centric wrote in a summary of the study.

Duh, if I were to switch over to a different keyboard than the one on my laptop, I'd enter text slowly as well, regardless of whether the keyboard layout was the same.

Specifically, participants did not think they could text message on the iPhone safely while driving.

As opposed to entering text messages on a physical keypad while driving? What an idiotic thing to do.

Buttons, knobs, dials, and *moving parts* are on the way out.

Better get used to it.

There's a few things we need before we can get rid of them.

First, we need to be able to differentiate between a touch and a press.

Second, we need good force feedback on the screen itself. There has been some promising research with this: 'simulating' the feel of a button with a small vibration.

Combine the two, and you have a usable touch screen interface. Without it, I'll keep my physical keyboard, thank you very much.

Buttons, knobs, dials, and *moving parts* are on the way out.

Better get used to it.

See I'm not so sure about that in general computing. I've tried a few different variations on non-physical keyboards, and I just don't feel right using a keyboard that doesn't physically move. In particular, I like having the contours between keys so that if I'm not sure that I'm hitting the right key, I can feel around for the edges of the key to determine where I am without having to look at the keyboard itself. This however is mainly because I'm a self-taught touch typist.

As for the physical vs virtual keyboard debate on the mobile scene, I agree entirely. Moving parts are on their way out.

On another note...

Specifically, participants did not think they could text message on the iPhone safely while driving.

You shouldn't be texting while typing in the first place, because texting at all while driving is inherently unsafe!

Duh, if I were to switch over to a different keyboard than the one on my laptop, I'd enter text slowly as well, regardless of whether the keyboard layout was the same.

not just that. the participants used their own phones for the first part of the experiment. but presumably they are very familiar with their own phones. it would be interesting to see how well they do on phones with physical keypads that they've never used before. i wonder if the time difference would be statistically significant there. also, it'd be interesting to see whether experienced iphone users find the keypad more or less efficient than physical keypads.

During each session, participants were required to use their own phones to copy 12 standard messages that had been created for the study. The participants, none of which had ever used an iPhone, were then provided with one of the Apple handsets and asked to repeat the task.

So what this study really shows is that people who have never used an iPhone before type more slowly than with phones they've owned for a while. Misleading title.

I type slower and make more mistakes every time I get a new keyboard, it's called muscle memory, key's are never in exactly the same place.

The iPhone/iPod Touch's keyboard is nice, it's sensitive enough they I haven't had it miss keystrokes. On the other hand my Nokia's physical keyboard is terrible, the top row of keys is too close to the screen, you can only depress half the key because of it. Of course this is just my experience with one phone, but meh.

In other news a new study found that rocks do not float when dropped into water.

+1

Anyone with a physical keypad could have told you this ages ago lol

I don't understand why people think all touch is gonna be the norm in the future, I really don't see that :/ HTC's lineup of qwerty keypad phones are amazing, the touch pro has got to be one of the best phone design there can be, obviously this is all IMO, but really, its got the touch screen for all you touch lovers but then it has a sleek side out qwerty keyboard and not with crappy buttons or anything but buttons that you have to press down and feel them click. I'm just not into things that I can't feel working, I still use an old school dell keyboard for the same reasons, it just feels good. The only downfall I see is that it has 5 lines of buttons which is a bit much, some of their other phones have the standard 4 and it feels just right. (HTC 6800)

I think HTC keypads should be on all smart phones, they have great buttons, I was so angry about the G1's keypad

Edited by Bekabam
I send over 14,000 texts a month and for me the keyboard ****es me off. I absolutely hate the on screen keyboard and it constantly selects the wrong letter.

My iPod Touch almost never selects the wrong letter and I can type rather quickly with it.

In other news a new study found that rocks do not float when dropped into water.

No kidding.

It took a study to find this out?

Is what the remaining of my tax moneys are going to?!

This is ludicrous.

No.... serious?

Wasn't this kinda... obvious?

my thoughts exactly...

however, i got used to it pretty fast and if it wasnt for the extremely crappy german auto-correction (the english one is WAY better) i would be typing even faster. =) especially in landscape-mode with easyWrite or something.

they are less efficient, sure, but you do get used to it and its getting easier, imho.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!