Study: iPhone keypad less efficient than physical QWERTY keypads


Recommended Posts

Bah, it's called learning curve. My MBP keyboard is a french canadian one and keys aren't the same compared to a pc keyboard. All the ??? keys are ready to type in one key and you do not have to type 2 keys to get the letter. With time, you get used to. That's the same with iphone/touch's keyboard.

When I first got the iPhone I was horrible with it. After a while I started getting used to it and the phone started learning what I typed and fixing mistakes automatically. Now I'm pretty good with it.

I send over 14,000 texts a month and for me the keyboard ****es me off. I absolutely hate the on screen keyboard and it constantly selects the wrong letter.

Btw, if you hit a button and hold, you can make sure you are selecting the correct letter, if you haven't, you can hold and drag your thumb across and it'll select the letters until it's correct.

I still prefer (physical) keyboards than what the iPhone has... I could never write a full text message with having to erase at least one of the letters because the on screen keyboard choose the wrong letter.

Maybe if I still had the iPhone I would be more used to it, but I still prefer physical keyboards

You send 467 texts a day? :bounce:

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

i doubt it, 140000 text messages a month is one text message every 2 minutes if you don't sleep :p

But anyway, that's offtopic :D

When I first got my iPhone I was pretty slow typing on it and was just pecking with my index finger but now that I've gotten use to it I can go full speed with both thumbs. It just takes a little while to get use to and now I believe I'm much faster on the iPhone then I would be on a physical keyboard. The fact that you don't have to physically push down a key means it's faster if you just get use to it and then the auto correct fixes most mistakes from typing so fast.

During each session, participants were required to use their own phones to copy 12 standard messages that had been created for the study. The participants, none of which had ever used an iPhone, were then provided with one of the Apple handsets and asked to repeat the task.

:blink:

Duh!

Of course if you give somebody a device that they never used before they're going to be slower with it. This is the most idiotic "study" I have seen in a long time. It says absolutely nothing.

Just from personal experience I can say that I was in fact slower with typing on the iPhone when I first got it. Then, barely a month after using it for a while, I can safely say I'm dramatically faster with the iPhone than I was with my Motorola Q. Once you learn to trust the auto-correction and get a feel for how to touch the screen I think most people will find that typing on the iPhone can be a breeze.

Good, I do not want to touch my screen to type. I hate fingerprints, I would rather there not be touch screens in the first place.

I love my HTC Touch Pro (with a physical keyboard).

+1

An unscientific anecdote to add to this.

When I got my iPhone last June (about a week after launch), we conducted a brief typing speed comparison.

The contenders were a Black berry with the standard 2-letters-per-key keyboard, a T9 piece-o-crap phone "stick" phone, and an iPhone. We typed a handful of messages:

  • "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog"
  • A couple of short email messages about server status and how to debug certain bits of code (things we'd actually sent from our phones).
  • The first paragraph of "On bull****", etc.
  • Some Lorem Ipsum
  • Absolutely no "ur 2 kewl lols" shorthand nonsense (we all find it repugnant).

T9 trounced both the Blackberry and iPhone for text messages in terms of speed and accuracy. The Blackberry edged out the iPhone by about 10% speed unless punctuation was used (where we tied). I have no doubt the iPhone would get destroyed on "c u l8r" style messages: it's suggestion system fights against you the whole way and you'd probably end up being 10-20x slower than any other phone.

On longer more complex passages the iPhone ended up being close with T9. On simpler texts with less punctuation and shorter words the iPhone lagged behind.

After a couple of months of use we found ourselves being much faster with the iPhone keyboard?learning to trust it's suggestions goes a long way?but T9 still ended up being the fastest by a noticable margin. Typing blind, like with your phone under a table at an office meeting was impossible on the iphone, passable on the black berry, and you hardly noticed the speed drop at all with T9.

The iPhone isn't the best at every single thing. The camera isn't great, the keyboard is among the worst, and you might find the service provider in your region is a steaming pile of horse ****. Considering all phones as a sum of their strengths and faults, I find the iPhone to be the best one on the market for the sorts of things I do with mine.

Typing on my iPhone is fast and pretty accurate, pfft hellavu better than on my old N95

Same here, I love the auto correction but I know some people hate it. Most of the time I am hitting the wrong keys I think but it doesn't really matter

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

Wow. And I thought that me sending out maybe 5-10 text messages every three months was a lot. But then again, I almost never text message.

Well most people would have trouble typing on a QWERTY phone if they have never used one before. I find it extremely easy to use my iPhone when texting. This study seems flawed to me because its just a new way of doing it doesn't mean its less efficient.

What, 20 participants? That's a representative of the whole world, surely?

Also, another study proves that studies similar to this one are unrepresentative, can be biased, and tend to be unscientific/unrealistic.

They should do that study with Nokia 5800. I have only had it for a week now but it is really easy to type on with two hands. I can achieve about the same WPM as my QWERTY phone. I think I make less errors on the Nokia 5800 too but that's mainly because you need to look at the screen whereas I often don't with my QWERTY. The nokia has haptic feedback too and comes with two stylus.

Granted, it is more difficult to use while walking and while you're talking to people.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Quantum Error Correction Validated in Nature: Microsoft and Quantinuum Log 800-Fold Improvement Two years after the original press-release announcement, independently peer-reviewed results published in Nature on June 10, 2026, have confirmed that Microsoft and Quantinuum achieved an 800-fold reduction in quantum error rates on real trapped-ion hardware — the largest gap between physical and logical error rates ever independently validated.    What Quantum Error Correction Actually Does — and Why Breaking Even Is Hard https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318329/20260613/quantum-error-correction-validated-nature-microsoft-quantinuum-log-800-fold-improvement.htm   Quantum Computing Wiring Bottleneck Cracked by HKU Silicon Carbide Chip at Qubit Temperature Engineers at the University of Hong Kong have built the first cryogenic control chip that operates at the same temperature as superconducting qubits — 10 millikelvin, or just one-hundredth of a degree above absolute zero — without generating the heat that has forced every competing approach to park its electronics hundreds of meters of cable away. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318325/20260613/quantum-computing-wiring-bottleneck-cracked-hku-silicon-carbide-chip-qubit-temperature.htm  
    • RevPDF 4.5.0 by Razvan Serea RevPDF is a free, fully offline PDF editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that lets you edit text and images directly inside PDF files — no internet connection, no account, and no cloud uploads required. Unlike bloated alternatives that demand subscriptions and constant connectivity, RevPDF fits in under 60MB on desktop while delivering a complete editing toolkit: annotate, redact, sign, compress, split, merge, convert, and reorganize pages, all processed locally on your device. Smart font matching ensures edited text blends seamlessly with the original, and multi-language support includes RTL scripts such as Arabic and Hebrew. Where most PDF editors force you to choose between features and simplicity, RevPDF manages both. You can build interactive forms from scratch with text fields, checkboxes, and dropdowns, permanently redact sensitive data before sharing, draw freehand on contracts and diagrams, and add custom watermarks — all without a single file leaving your machine. Edit Text and Images Directly Inside PDFs RevPDF supports true inline PDF editing — not just annotation layers on top of a document, but actual modification of existing text and images within the file. A smart font-matching engine identifies the font used in the original document and applies it automatically when you make edits, so changes blend naturally with the surrounding content. You can reposition elements, resize images, and update text across single pages or entire documents. RevPDF 4.5.0 release notes: This is one of the biggest updates to RevPDF yet. A lot of things people have been asking for are finally here. New Features Auto Redaction Permanently redact sensitive text and areas from your PDFs before sharing. Clean, irreversible, and fully offline. Comments, Links & Bookmarks Add comments for review, insert clickable links, and create bookmarks to jump around long documents without scrolling forever. Find & Replace Search across the whole document and replace text in one go. Long overdue. Split Pages Vertically or Horizontally Split any page down the middle, vertically or horizontally. Perfect for scanned books or double-page spreads. New Drawing Tools More tools for freehand drawing and markup, better for annotations, sketches, and detailed notes. Continuous Scrolling in Editor The editor now scrolls continuously through pages instead of jumping between them. Working through long documents is a lot smoother now. PDF Metadata Editor View and edit the metadata stored inside your PDFs, including title, author, subject, and keywords. Better Font Matching Text edits now blend in more naturally by doing a better job of matching the original font. Tabbed PDF Viewer Open multiple PDFs at once in tabs and switch between them without going back to the home screen. Add Links Insert hyperlinks anywhere in your PDF, to external URLs or to other pages within the document. Share & Print Shortcuts Share or print directly from the editing screen, home screen, and viewer. No extra steps. Minor Updates Paste images directly from clipboard into your PDF New image editing tools for more control over images inside documents Bug Fixes Fixed file saving issues on Windows and Linux Everything still works fully offline. No login, no cloud, no account. Your files stay on your device. Download: RevPDF 4.5.0 | 58.0 MB (Open Source) Links: RevPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshots 1 | 2 Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Interesting. I'm not using a VPN with my phone. I tried though my home internet (Rogers) and my cellular internet (Telus) using their respective DNS servers and both trigger the dialog above.
    • Three days after Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 as the most capable AI model it had ever released to the public, the United States government ordered it switched off — and now the company is refunding customers who paid to use a product that vanished almost overnight https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318342/20260613/us-government-pulls-anthropics-fable-5-offline-now-come-refunds-vanished-ai.htm  
    • Microsoft fired the team and replaced them with AI and this is what you get.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!