Study: iPhone keypad less efficient than physical QWERTY keypads


Recommended Posts

Bah, it's called learning curve. My MBP keyboard is a french canadian one and keys aren't the same compared to a pc keyboard. All the ??? keys are ready to type in one key and you do not have to type 2 keys to get the letter. With time, you get used to. That's the same with iphone/touch's keyboard.

When I first got the iPhone I was horrible with it. After a while I started getting used to it and the phone started learning what I typed and fixing mistakes automatically. Now I'm pretty good with it.

I send over 14,000 texts a month and for me the keyboard ****es me off. I absolutely hate the on screen keyboard and it constantly selects the wrong letter.

Btw, if you hit a button and hold, you can make sure you are selecting the correct letter, if you haven't, you can hold and drag your thumb across and it'll select the letters until it's correct.

I still prefer (physical) keyboards than what the iPhone has... I could never write a full text message with having to erase at least one of the letters because the on screen keyboard choose the wrong letter.

Maybe if I still had the iPhone I would be more used to it, but I still prefer physical keyboards

You send 467 texts a day? :bounce:

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

i doubt it, 140000 text messages a month is one text message every 2 minutes if you don't sleep :p

But anyway, that's offtopic :D

When I first got my iPhone I was pretty slow typing on it and was just pecking with my index finger but now that I've gotten use to it I can go full speed with both thumbs. It just takes a little while to get use to and now I believe I'm much faster on the iPhone then I would be on a physical keyboard. The fact that you don't have to physically push down a key means it's faster if you just get use to it and then the auto correct fixes most mistakes from typing so fast.

During each session, participants were required to use their own phones to copy 12 standard messages that had been created for the study. The participants, none of which had ever used an iPhone, were then provided with one of the Apple handsets and asked to repeat the task.

:blink:

Duh!

Of course if you give somebody a device that they never used before they're going to be slower with it. This is the most idiotic "study" I have seen in a long time. It says absolutely nothing.

Just from personal experience I can say that I was in fact slower with typing on the iPhone when I first got it. Then, barely a month after using it for a while, I can safely say I'm dramatically faster with the iPhone than I was with my Motorola Q. Once you learn to trust the auto-correction and get a feel for how to touch the screen I think most people will find that typing on the iPhone can be a breeze.

Good, I do not want to touch my screen to type. I hate fingerprints, I would rather there not be touch screens in the first place.

I love my HTC Touch Pro (with a physical keyboard).

+1

An unscientific anecdote to add to this.

When I got my iPhone last June (about a week after launch), we conducted a brief typing speed comparison.

The contenders were a Black berry with the standard 2-letters-per-key keyboard, a T9 piece-o-crap phone "stick" phone, and an iPhone. We typed a handful of messages:

  • "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog"
  • A couple of short email messages about server status and how to debug certain bits of code (things we'd actually sent from our phones).
  • The first paragraph of "On bull****", etc.
  • Some Lorem Ipsum
  • Absolutely no "ur 2 kewl lols" shorthand nonsense (we all find it repugnant).

T9 trounced both the Blackberry and iPhone for text messages in terms of speed and accuracy. The Blackberry edged out the iPhone by about 10% speed unless punctuation was used (where we tied). I have no doubt the iPhone would get destroyed on "c u l8r" style messages: it's suggestion system fights against you the whole way and you'd probably end up being 10-20x slower than any other phone.

On longer more complex passages the iPhone ended up being close with T9. On simpler texts with less punctuation and shorter words the iPhone lagged behind.

After a couple of months of use we found ourselves being much faster with the iPhone keyboard?learning to trust it's suggestions goes a long way?but T9 still ended up being the fastest by a noticable margin. Typing blind, like with your phone under a table at an office meeting was impossible on the iphone, passable on the black berry, and you hardly noticed the speed drop at all with T9.

The iPhone isn't the best at every single thing. The camera isn't great, the keyboard is among the worst, and you might find the service provider in your region is a steaming pile of horse ****. Considering all phones as a sum of their strengths and faults, I find the iPhone to be the best one on the market for the sorts of things I do with mine.

Typing on my iPhone is fast and pretty accurate, pfft hellavu better than on my old N95

Same here, I love the auto correction but I know some people hate it. Most of the time I am hitting the wrong keys I think but it doesn't really matter

It's possible. I used to do around 10,000 a month at one point. Now I'm down to about 5,000.

As for the study, the big thing for me is feeling the keys. I can type a whole message on my Q9H without looking at the keyboard or even the phone. I just know where the keys are and can type very accurately. On any device with a touch screen keyboard, I'm not sure I would be able to pull off the same feat.

Wow. And I thought that me sending out maybe 5-10 text messages every three months was a lot. But then again, I almost never text message.

Well most people would have trouble typing on a QWERTY phone if they have never used one before. I find it extremely easy to use my iPhone when texting. This study seems flawed to me because its just a new way of doing it doesn't mean its less efficient.

What, 20 participants? That's a representative of the whole world, surely?

Also, another study proves that studies similar to this one are unrepresentative, can be biased, and tend to be unscientific/unrealistic.

They should do that study with Nokia 5800. I have only had it for a week now but it is really easy to type on with two hands. I can achieve about the same WPM as my QWERTY phone. I think I make less errors on the Nokia 5800 too but that's mainly because you need to look at the screen whereas I often don't with my QWERTY. The nokia has haptic feedback too and comes with two stylus.

Granted, it is more difficult to use while walking and while you're talking to people.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You are clueless. The updates are done in the background so the next time you open Edge the updates are applied automatically. There is no need to close all your tabs. Just keep browsing like you normally do. Clearly you don't use Edge and are just one of those haters that complain for the sake of complaining.
    • I don't get this David. Can you explain it please.  
    • Microsoft is busy. Lots of changes to be released imminently for Windows server or soon. Also, lots happening for next version as well. Third party virus scanning software is being moved out of Kernel mode to avoid repeat of Crowdstrike incident. Windows Protected Mode and Windows Ready Print no longer require third party print drivers to be installed. New storage stack being developed. New NVME drivers now available for Windows Server 2025 to improve local NVME drive performance by 60+ percent. NVME-Of of fabric being worked on for next release to improve network access to NVME drives. ReFs (next file system) now has ability to boot and will become default file system in next release of Windows Server. ReFs improves on NTFS in several areas including resiliency and reliability and scalability. New update stack is being worked on to unify Windows updates, and updates for drivers and first party/3rd party application software. A stricter and more robust third-party driver certification program (ODI) is being worked on to improve performance, thermals, battery life, and reliability on modern Windows hardware by tightening how OEMs and IHVs (Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, etc.) build and ship drivers. There is a tone more but too numerous to mention.
    • Now disable that stupid OneDrive backup request when Windows starts please. So unbelievably frustrating to only have “remind me later” instead of “no and never ask me again”
    • Hello, The Media Creation Tool is still at v10.0.26100.7019 from October 2025. Just looks like the backend has been updated. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      truespursfan earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      restore went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!