Gran Torino (2008)


Recommended Posts

This movie was filmed right in my home town. There's supposedly a police chase shot on the main road two blocks away.

I can't wait to see it, mainly for this reason! I'm glad to hear it's being so well received already. This was a big deal for Michigan!

-Emily

This movie was filmed right in my home town. There's supposedly a police chase shot on the main road two blocks away.

I can't wait to see it, mainly for this reason! I'm glad to hear it's being so well received already. This was a big deal for Michigan!

-Emily

There weren't any car chase scenes. A few involving a car, but no chase.

There weren't any car chase scenes. A few involving a car, but no chase.

I suppose it could be a scene that was cut out. I know they closed down the road for a "police chase scene" of some sort.

I didn't stop hearing about this movie for months on end. It's pretty exciting; a lot of movies being filmed here lately. There will be another movie coming out soon, a Drew Barrymore movie called "Whip it!", which was actually partially shot where I work. It's very neat to be a part of it all:):)

  • 2 weeks later...

Another 9/10 from me a really great film, only gripe was the poor acting by the young kid but they new they took a risk with him not coming from a an acting background.

I held my composure until I saw the dog at the end and then I cryed like a baby... not sure that is a spoiler but anyway

Watched this over the weekend and I was disappointed. I think mainly because of only hearing good things about it from everyone. While I did enjoy the movie, I don't believe it should have been put up there next to Slumdog, Doubt and Milk. Acting was average for most of the cast (minus Eastwood) and I cannot say enough how much I hated everytime he "grunted".

+1 @ Bawk... I HATED that scene when he locked the kid in the basement, I thought it was so over the top it took away from the ending.

still 7/10 but I think the hype ruined most of it for me.

This film is awesome, truly breathtaking performance from Clint. He still has it after all.

Totally bad ass cinema. He practically reprises his Dirty Harry role, but that's what makes it so good.

My thoughts too, can't believe he still has it (Y) One negative thing is the poor acting by the boy.

Radish?

I went into this expecting utter brilliance and came out disappointed. I am a huge movie nut and I also study film in college and I believe this is the sole reason why I have so many gripes with this movie.

The story is up first, my main complaint would be that it drags on into an absolute snore fest at some points! I'm no stranger to character development but Jesus this was taking it too far :| a lot of scenes felt completely irrelevant and a 1:40+ min movie felt like a 3 hour movie. Clint Eastwood while his performance was one of the only redeeming factors of the film had absolutely appalling lines, after like the 30th grunt and growl I felt the sudden urge to drill out my ears.

Second is down right shambolic cinematography and editing as someone mentioned above, there were cuts and shots that were completely irrelevant to what was going on. That cannot be excused, it made the film feel like it was on a really low budget and just felt tacky.

The acting is also a major issue, I realise this is the first time most of these kids are acting in a movie so I will be more lenient but fact is they just did not perform well enough, As mentioned above the scene when he gets locked into the basement was painful to watch, poor poor acting..

Overall I personally do not think this movie was worthy of all the 9/10's however it did successfully invoke some emotions in me and did carry the plot well if a little over done. A movie that could have been great dragged down only by the lingering faults mentioned above and so the best I can say of it is that the movie was good.

I went into this expecting utter brilliance and came out disappointed. I am a huge movie nut and I also study film in college and I believe this is the sole reason why I have so many gripes with this movie.

The story is up first, my main complaint would be that it drags on into an absolute snore fest at some points! I'm no stranger to character development but Jesus this was taking it too far :| a lot of scenes felt completely irrelevant and a 1:40+ min movie felt like a 3 hour movie. Clint Eastwood while his performance was one of the only redeeming factors of the film had absolutely appalling lines, after like the 30th grunt and growl I felt the sudden urge to drill out my ears.

Second is down right shambolic cinematography and editing as someone mentioned above, there were cuts and shots that were completely irrelevant to what was going on. That cannot be excused, it made the film feel like it was on a really low budget and just felt tacky.

The acting is also a major issue, I realise this is the first time most of these kids are acting in a movie so I will be more lenient but fact is they just did not perform well enough, As mentioned above the scene when he gets locked into the basement was painful to watch, poor poor acting..

Overall I personally do not think this movie was worthy of all the 9/10's however it did successfully invoke some emotions in me and did carry the plot well if a little over done. A movie that could have been great dragged down only by the lingering faults mentioned above and so the best I can say of it is that the movie was good.

It's like you're in my head. You'll be someone great someday.

  • 1 month later...

Do not laugh when I say this but this was the first Clint Eastwood film I have ever seen.

It was amazing!! I loved every minute of this film, I was border line balling my eyes out towards the ending of the film.

I would rate this a 10/10

Was just simply amazing, very nicely done and well worth watching :D

^Now watch Mystic River, Unforgiven, Changeling.

Oh?

They all Clint Eastwood films or films that are just set in the same style and genre as 'Gran Torino'

But its great that you mentioned them because Im going into the city tomorrow in search to by some movies to add to the collection... I will look at those while Im at the store.

Oh?

They all Clint Eastwood films or films that are just set in the same style and genre as 'Gran Torino'

But its great that you mentioned them because Im going into the city tomorrow in search to by some movies to add to the collection... I will look at those while Im at the store.

Those are movies directed by Clint Eastwood himself.

  • 3 weeks later...
Well, certainly not that bad, but I cant put it among the top 10 of 2008.

Watched it again just to analyse it better and I disliked it even more. The acting sucked big time, with Clint beign the only one who did a decent jod. His character is well written and executed but the rest of the characters and the plot itself could've been handled a lot better.

Not even in the 20008's Top 15 for me.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!