Recommended Posts

That's odd. I've never seen that version number. Anyway, I searched Google for "service pack 2 v.4354". Apparently, that version number is associated with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Server Edition. You're right though... I too couldn't find a UXTheme patcher for that version of service pack 2.

That's odd. I've never seen that version number. Anyway, I searched Google for "service pack 2 v.4354". Apparently, that version number is associated with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Server Edition. You're right though... I too couldn't find a UXTheme patcher for that version of service pack 2.

XP x64 shares its codebase with Server 2003.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_x6...nal_x64_Edition

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Uhhhh.... his is trying to install/modify the uxtheme.dll. It's ok to go outside children.

This is the wrong forum. Completed Visual Styles is to only be used for, appropriately, completed visual styles. He should have posted in the general Customizing Windows XP forum. Not sure what you meant by the "OK to go outside" comment.

Not the end of the world or anything, though; a mod will eventually move it.

To the OP: Just upgrade to SP3 and download a patched UXTheme.dll for that.

To the OP: Just upgrade to SP3 and download a patched UXTheme.dll for that.

XP x64 is built on Server 2003, and is only at SP2 level at the moment. However, the OP probably has a beta version of SP2 installed. Uninstall the previous version and upgrade to final build of SP2. Regarding the matter at hand, I don't know of any UXTheme.dll hacks for XP x64.

That wasnt the ORIGINAL OS on any machine -- if it is the one that was installed when he bought it -- its pretty crappy.

XP64 originally was given out (for like $5.00) for anyone wanting to trade in their XP Pro license.

I rec'd a CD in the mail from MS - and it was right when XP64 was released (about the time that old ass computer was built I think) and it wasnt a beta and there were no v.### - so just get magicjellybeans - and figure out what your license is, and get another .iso --

or I should say it isnt an OEM -

XP x64 is built on Server 2003, and is only at SP2 level at the moment. However, the OP probably has a beta version of SP2 installed. Uninstall the previous version and upgrade to final build of SP2. Regarding the matter at hand, I don't know of any UXTheme.dll hacks for XP x64.

Really? Huh, I thought they always updated the x86 and x64 versions at the same time. Thanks for the heads-up!

Really? Huh, I thought they always updated the x86 and x64 versions at the same time. Thanks for the heads-up!

For Vista they do but XP64 and normal XP are on two different code bases. XP64 is just server 2003 with a few small modifications, so when updates come out for the server 2003 code base xp64 will also be updated.

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
    • Well, they (LibreOffice/The Document Foundation) are bitchy and whiny, yes, but they're right, at least this time. It doesn't make sense to market something as "free and open source to thwart dependency on foreign companies' software" but at the same time, using the formats of said companies (Microsoft) by default. That way, you are changing nothing, essentially, you're just using another UI. We all know that users just use the defaults and almost never change them. I'm not saying they should drop other formats altogether, but they shouldn't default to the thing they're trying to run away from in the first place. If you're gonna do something, just go all the way in, don't stop in the middle, IMO. Otherwise, shut up and move along.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!