first Screenshot for Windows 7 build 7004 !


Recommended Posts

man there are a lot of places now you can place shortcuts for your apps. I dont use Desktop icons anymore as shortcuts, just have all my most used apps on the left pane of the start menu in Vista. Now the Superbar can be used for that also. Im not saying having more locations to put them is bad, but almost feel its a little redundant to have apps on the left pane of the start menu and on the superbar

Whats the good word? ;)

Miserable AU fan here btw. :(

man there are a lot of places now you can place shortcuts for your apps. I dont use Desktop icons anymore as shortcuts, just have all my most used apps on the left pane of the start menu in Vista. Now the Superbar can be used for that also. Im not saying having more locations to put them is bad, but almost feel its a little redundant to have apps on the left pane of the start menu and on the superbar

There's not anymore places than there was before, quicklaunch ahs always been there on the taskbar.

Well while it does borrow one feature from the Dock, that being the fct you use the same icon for an non running and a runnign app, I wouldn't call it a dumbed down version, for one it's still a taskbar not a dock. I'm still not sure if this is a good thing though.

I liek all the new features of the superbar with the flyouts and other innovative stuff MS added to it. I'm just not sure having the same icon for a running app and a non runnign app is all that good. Though I'll have to actually try the superbar first, and I do believe the flyout thingies even work on non runnign apps, so you can click the cionand choos to open for example a recent document, and it'l lstart the app and open that document all at once, wich does help a bit to blur the line between running and not running, and making the pinned icons make more sense

But we'll see. Either way dumber down I wouldn't call it. it still got all the advantages of the taskbar and new innovations in usability. so it's more of a usability. Taking what's great with the taskbar, taking what's good about the dock, then adding a good sprinkle of innovative new features. and you got the dockbar 2.0, Better than the taskbar, better than the dock.

So it's using same icon for a running app and non running app -> that's really :wacko: thing i hate about OSX Dock as well. Solution for me at least is going to be to remove all icons from task bar, so they only show up there if app is running. Not sure why MS went with icons, cause taskbar is going to look like Circus. In my book it's so crowded an inpractical to hover over icon to see previews of what i'm running. I never use previews in Vista since it's quicker to look at taskbar and for each running app you can read first couple words of title bar which is damn enough for you to know what are you running.

The bottom line is. This new Superbar is the most stupidest thing i have seen in my life. It's so freaking inpractical and crowded...it's just :blink: Now somebody might get offended by this, but i can't find another word to describe it. MS forces us again to do extra click.WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DAMN IT.

I'm not sure who is designer in MS, but that group of people have no clue what they are doing. They better fix GUI circus where each app follows its own design and color scheme like in Vista. Nothing is consistent there.

Edited by jjrambo
and full release in July or something?

Because that's what I have been reading all over most sites

If the RC were to come out in April. I predict the final release around June.

I'm sure that beta 1 won't have all the features in, I would think that's the definition of a beta?

I heard Beta 1 is supposed to be "feature complete", so we'll have to wait and see what's in the build went it's released.

So it's using same icon for a running app and non running app -> that's really :wacko: thing i hate about OSX Dock as well. Solution for me at least is going to be to remove all icons from task bar, so they only show up there if app is running. Not sure why MS went with icons, cause taskbar is going to look like Circus. In my book it's so crowded an inpractical to hover over icon to see previews of what i'm running. I never use previews in Vista since it's quicker to look at taskbar and for each running app you can read first couple words of title bar which is damn enough for you to know what are you running.

The bottom line is. This new Superbar is the most stupidest thing i have seen in my life. It's so freaking inpractical and crowded...it's just :blink: Now somebody might get offended by this, but i can't find another word to describe it. MS forces us again to do extra click.WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DAMN IT.

I'm not sure who is designer in MS, but that group of people have no clue what they are doing. They better fix GUI circus where each app follows its own design and color scheme like in Vista. Nothing is consistent there.

-You don't have to click to see the previews.

-Icons don't pin themselves to the taskbar, so unless you explicitly create a shortcut there yourself, you will never have to remove anything in the first place.

-And here's a screenshot to prove that everything can be laid out with text, and smaller icons, exactly like it is in Vista:

http://w7.netraworks.com/images/small-icon...ver-combine.jpg

I LOVE the new default setting for the taskbar, but you and other like-minded individuals, however, don't have to even look at it. You can change it to function the old way. :D .

Edited by Kyang
-You don't have to click to see the previews.

And here's the option for everything to be laid out, exactly like it is in Vista:

- http://w7.netraworks.com/images/small-icon...ver-combine.jpg

I LOVE the new default setting for the taskbar, but you and other like-minded individuals, however, don't have to even look at it. You can change it to function the old way. :D .

Thanks. That's what i'm looking for. It would be nice MS does survey so people send screenshots of their running Windows 7 desktop when it gets released. I bet more people will be running this way then with default settings for Superbar.

So it's using same icon for a running app and non running app -> that's really :wacko: thing i hate about OSX Dock as well. Solution for me at least is going to be to remove all icons from task bar, so they only show up there if app is running. Not sure why MS went with icons, cause taskbar is going to look like Circus. In my book it's so crowded an inpractical to hover over icon to see previews of what i'm running. I never use previews in Vista since it's quicker to look at taskbar and for each running app you can read first couple words of title bar which is damn enough for you to know what are you running.

The bottom line is. This new Superbar is the most stupidest thing i have seen in my life. It's so freaking inpractical and crowded...it's just :blink: Now somebody might get offended by this, but i can't find another word to describe it. MS forces us again to do extra click.WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DAMN IT.

I'm not sure who is designer in MS, but that group of people have no clue what they are doing. They better fix GUI circus where each app follows its own design and color scheme like in Vista. Nothing is consistent there.

Have you actually used the superbar? I had no problem distinguishing programs and apps and such and it didn't seem crouded at all. I like it a lot better than the current taskbar.

Have you actually used the superbar? I had no problem distinguishing programs and apps and such and it didn't seem crouded at all. I like it a lot better than the current taskbar.

I don't like it. I like Vista style with no quick lunch and previews and disabled drawer for tray icons. I use alt tab which i only found to be useful.

Yeah, no one is going to force you to pin programs to the taskbar, and you can even do it the old way with a seperate quicklaunch toolbar.

Furthermore, the icons for non-running programs are flat while open windows have a raised 3D edge so it's not that hard to tell them apart, and it's actually less crowded because the icon becomes the window tab when you run the program. If you use a quick launch bar, that eats up additional space always.

So it's using same icon for a running app and non running app -> that's really :wacko: thing i hate about OSX Dock as well. Solution for me at least is going to be to remove all icons from task bar, so they only show up there if app is running. Not sure why MS went with icons, cause taskbar is going to look like Circus. In my book it's so crowded an inpractical to hover over icon to see previews of what i'm running. I never use previews in Vista since it's quicker to look at taskbar and for each running app you can read first couple words of title bar which is damn enough for you to know what are you running.

The bottom line is. This new Superbar is the most stupidest thing i have seen in my life. It's so freaking inpractical and crowded...it's just :blink: Now somebody might get offended by this, but i can't find another word to describe it. MS forces us again to do extra click.WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DAMN IT.

I'm not sure who is designer in MS, but that group of people have no clue what they are doing. They better fix GUI circus where each app follows its own design and color scheme like in Vista. Nothing is consistent there.

Running apps in the OS X Dock are marked underneath with a point of light. You don't need to hover over anything to know what's running.

Running apps in the OS X Dock are marked underneath with a point of light. You don't need to hover over anything to know what's running.

I can see that the way his first and second sentences were worded, it seemed he implied that someone using the dock needed to hover over an icon to see if it was running, but I think he was only saying that he didn't like how the dock used the same icon for running, and non-running applications, and nothing more.

I can see that the way his first and second sentences were worded, it seemed he implied that someone using the dock needed to hover over an icon to see if it was running, but I think he was only saying that he didn't like how the dock used the same icon for running, and non-running applications, and nothing more.

I said i don't like dock and superbar for same reason, having same icon for running, and non-running applications.

I said i don't like dock and superbar for same reason, having same icon for running, and non-running applications.

Yeah, I got that. I was just saying that LTD might have misunderstood that you thought the user needed to hover over icons in the dock to see if they were running apps or not, because of the way your first few sentences were written.

Ah, I understand now.

Fair enough. It might be hard to implement different icons for running/non-running though. Unless you make the marker underneath more pronounced. But as I take it you would rather not have those icons there to being with, which would do away with the problem entirely.

If the RC were to come out in April. I predict the final release around June.

I heard Beta 1 is supposed to be "feature complete", so we'll have to wait and see what's in the build went it's released.

I believe Microsoft want to RTM by April and have a full release ready for retail by June or something. It'll be like Windows Vista where enterprise people technet/MSDN subscribers get the RTM before everyone else.

I believe Microsoft want to RTM by April and have a full release ready for retail by June or something. It'll be like Windows Vista where enterprise people technet/MSDN subscribers get the RTM before everyone else.

The RC would have to come out around February-March for it to RTM in April. But then again, development has been going very well with Windows 7, so it wouldn't be surprising if the RC came out that fast.

Thanks. That's what i'm looking for. It would be nice MS does survey so people send screenshots of their running Windows 7 desktop when it gets released. I bet more people will be running this way then with default settings for Superbar.

You can be certain there is instrumentation to determine this. But so far the new defaults are doing extremely well in terms of tests with actual users and in terms of feedback from people using it every day.

I know from my own experience that the new taskbar with default settings has made me much more efficient and made using my machine much simpler. That, combined with the window arranging features (which are amazingly helpful both on my small laptop screen and on my multi-mon dev station), have made Win7 a delight to use for my day-to-day tasks.

I don't like it. I like Vista style with no quick lunch and previews and disabled drawer for tray icons. I use alt tab which i only found to be useful.

You didn't answer the question. I'm going to assume you haven't used it, in which case your feedback is especially irrelevant.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!