Recommended Posts

pic25rw6.png

If you really want old sidebar inder Windows 7 the following you can do.

Go to Program Files for x86 or Program Files (x86) on x64 Vista. I run x64 Vista so i had to go into Program Files (x86). Take whole folder Windows Sidebar and copy over the Windows 7 machine. You can paste it on desktop. Go and just rund sidebar.exe. If you want you can overwrite in Program Files. When you run you will get your Vista sidebar. All gadgets work fine.

Sidebar is fully functional, you can set its properties etc. It seems that program has no dependencies so actually to be simple it's the same damn code like in Vista with few things disabled in code, improved, cleaned. I'm a programmer and i know how the **** works. When somebody tells you that MS write OS from scratch they lie to you...It's code build on top of older code.

why

you can just line up your gadgets on the side...

Somebody asked for Vista Sidebar under Windows 7...there you go. I don't use Sidebar or any sort of gadgets don't care about it, but figured somebody likes old Vista sidebar. When you delete Vista copy of sidebar, those gadgets might not show up when you try to add them using Windows 7 sidebar. Under search bar where it says all gadgets click little arrow and select all gadgets and it will find them :)

Edited by jjrambo

This is terribly unwise. Not only are you giving up all the bugfixes, performance improvements, and security improvements that have been made in Windows 7's gadget platform, but you're also running in an unsupported configuration that could cause any number of unexpected problems.

It seems that program has no dependencies so actually to be simple it's the same damn code like in Vista with few things disabled in code, improved, cleaned. I'm a programmer and i know how the **** works. When somebody tells you that MS write OS from scratch they lie to you...It's code build on top of older code.

What the heck does that mean? Windows 7 is fully compatible with Vista, what dependency would exist on Vista but not on Windows 7?

Nobody would expect that to fail. It's the other way (Win7 stuff on Vista) that's even slightly interesting, genius.

I like the sidebar because it makes more use of my screen. I usually just use the internet, and have a maximized window without the sidebar leaves a lot of empty spaces on the side.

So don't maximize :)

In fact, in Win7 you can just double click on the top or bottom border of the window (or drag the top or bottom to the edge of the screen) to get into the "vertical maximize" state.

This is terribly unwise. Not only are you giving up all the bugfixes, performance improvements, and security improvements that have been made in Windows 7's gadget platform, but you're also running in an unsupported configuration that could cause any number of unexpected problems.

What the heck does that mean? Windows 7 is fully compatible with Vista, what dependency would exist on Vista but not on Windows 7?

Nobody would expect that to fail. It's the other way (Win7 stuff on Vista) that's even slightly interesting, genius.

Thank you!! I was missing having the gadgets visible all the time, now I can just glance over to see the info I need no silly mouse movements or keyboard keys to hit.

EDIT

Hum it seems flyouts don't work though :(

why

you can just line up your gadgets on the side...

Well one feature I am going to miss "sidebar is always on top of other windows" No matter what I am doing I can always just glance to the right and be informed about whatever I want to be informed about.

If you want the gadgets spread all over the desktop the vista sidebar can do that too.

The Windows 7 sidebar sounds like it is the same only they removed functionality.

So don't maximize :)

In fact, in Win7 you can just double click on the top or bottom border of the window (or drag the top or bottom to the edge of the screen) to get into the "vertical maximize" state.

Still not nearly as intuitive as just clicking maximize and having your info and utility gadgets allways right there on the sidebar though, is it ?

and hardly something you want to do to every windows you use when you work with a lot of maximized windows. As I said before there's NO reason at all for the sidebar to be removed, all the features in 7 could have been added without removing the otpion to use the sidebar if you want it. or even add in the sidebar as a extra app hat acts as a gadget dock.

removing it is only removing a usefull feature for those who use it and like it. the "new" features of putting gadgetson the dekstop without the sidebar visible was allready there in Vista. so the only new feature is really the edge docking. The dekstop peak isn't really part of the gadgets but rather the dwm.

And I doubt I'm alone in wanting some allways visible gadgets on the side of my screen to make use of my widescreen, without havign to use a stupid peak feature (again, not really a new feature, you could do it in Vista, only it didn't hide the windows, it brought the gadgets on top).

But as I said before, I'd be happy if they added a sort of virtual desktop edge, where you could move the mouse to the edge of the screen, and sort of drag out and edge or something, to create a custom buffer or padding on the side f the screen to the docked gadgets are allways visible.

Pretty hilarious! .. it wasn't that long ago that everyone seemed to detest the sidebar and refused to even contemplate using it ..

You can't please all the people all the time ..

I think you're confusing the vocal minority with everyone.

There's one rule above all on the internet, and among computer magazines when they still existed bak in the dark ages too :p

- You only ever hear the peopel who complain.

the people who aren't complaining are just using their software. They're not going on internet forums writing whine threads about how much they like using it or whatever. The vocal minority is what causes problems in MMO games.

Pretty hilarious! .. it wasn't that long ago that everyone seemed to detest the sidebar and refused to even contemplate using it ..

You can't please all the people all the time ..

not mentioning bitching about it as "useless" "waste of space " "bloats"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!