Recommended Posts

pic25rw6.png

If you really want old sidebar inder Windows 7 the following you can do.

Go to Program Files for x86 or Program Files (x86) on x64 Vista. I run x64 Vista so i had to go into Program Files (x86). Take whole folder Windows Sidebar and copy over the Windows 7 machine. You can paste it on desktop. Go and just rund sidebar.exe. If you want you can overwrite in Program Files. When you run you will get your Vista sidebar. All gadgets work fine.

Sidebar is fully functional, you can set its properties etc. It seems that program has no dependencies so actually to be simple it's the same damn code like in Vista with few things disabled in code, improved, cleaned. I'm a programmer and i know how the **** works. When somebody tells you that MS write OS from scratch they lie to you...It's code build on top of older code.

why

you can just line up your gadgets on the side...

Somebody asked for Vista Sidebar under Windows 7...there you go. I don't use Sidebar or any sort of gadgets don't care about it, but figured somebody likes old Vista sidebar. When you delete Vista copy of sidebar, those gadgets might not show up when you try to add them using Windows 7 sidebar. Under search bar where it says all gadgets click little arrow and select all gadgets and it will find them :)

Edited by jjrambo

This is terribly unwise. Not only are you giving up all the bugfixes, performance improvements, and security improvements that have been made in Windows 7's gadget platform, but you're also running in an unsupported configuration that could cause any number of unexpected problems.

It seems that program has no dependencies so actually to be simple it's the same damn code like in Vista with few things disabled in code, improved, cleaned. I'm a programmer and i know how the **** works. When somebody tells you that MS write OS from scratch they lie to you...It's code build on top of older code.

What the heck does that mean? Windows 7 is fully compatible with Vista, what dependency would exist on Vista but not on Windows 7?

Nobody would expect that to fail. It's the other way (Win7 stuff on Vista) that's even slightly interesting, genius.

I like the sidebar because it makes more use of my screen. I usually just use the internet, and have a maximized window without the sidebar leaves a lot of empty spaces on the side.

So don't maximize :)

In fact, in Win7 you can just double click on the top or bottom border of the window (or drag the top or bottom to the edge of the screen) to get into the "vertical maximize" state.

This is terribly unwise. Not only are you giving up all the bugfixes, performance improvements, and security improvements that have been made in Windows 7's gadget platform, but you're also running in an unsupported configuration that could cause any number of unexpected problems.

What the heck does that mean? Windows 7 is fully compatible with Vista, what dependency would exist on Vista but not on Windows 7?

Nobody would expect that to fail. It's the other way (Win7 stuff on Vista) that's even slightly interesting, genius.

Thank you!! I was missing having the gadgets visible all the time, now I can just glance over to see the info I need no silly mouse movements or keyboard keys to hit.

EDIT

Hum it seems flyouts don't work though :(

why

you can just line up your gadgets on the side...

Well one feature I am going to miss "sidebar is always on top of other windows" No matter what I am doing I can always just glance to the right and be informed about whatever I want to be informed about.

If you want the gadgets spread all over the desktop the vista sidebar can do that too.

The Windows 7 sidebar sounds like it is the same only they removed functionality.

So don't maximize :)

In fact, in Win7 you can just double click on the top or bottom border of the window (or drag the top or bottom to the edge of the screen) to get into the "vertical maximize" state.

Still not nearly as intuitive as just clicking maximize and having your info and utility gadgets allways right there on the sidebar though, is it ?

and hardly something you want to do to every windows you use when you work with a lot of maximized windows. As I said before there's NO reason at all for the sidebar to be removed, all the features in 7 could have been added without removing the otpion to use the sidebar if you want it. or even add in the sidebar as a extra app hat acts as a gadget dock.

removing it is only removing a usefull feature for those who use it and like it. the "new" features of putting gadgetson the dekstop without the sidebar visible was allready there in Vista. so the only new feature is really the edge docking. The dekstop peak isn't really part of the gadgets but rather the dwm.

And I doubt I'm alone in wanting some allways visible gadgets on the side of my screen to make use of my widescreen, without havign to use a stupid peak feature (again, not really a new feature, you could do it in Vista, only it didn't hide the windows, it brought the gadgets on top).

But as I said before, I'd be happy if they added a sort of virtual desktop edge, where you could move the mouse to the edge of the screen, and sort of drag out and edge or something, to create a custom buffer or padding on the side f the screen to the docked gadgets are allways visible.

Pretty hilarious! .. it wasn't that long ago that everyone seemed to detest the sidebar and refused to even contemplate using it ..

You can't please all the people all the time ..

I think you're confusing the vocal minority with everyone.

There's one rule above all on the internet, and among computer magazines when they still existed bak in the dark ages too :p

- You only ever hear the peopel who complain.

the people who aren't complaining are just using their software. They're not going on internet forums writing whine threads about how much they like using it or whatever. The vocal minority is what causes problems in MMO games.

Pretty hilarious! .. it wasn't that long ago that everyone seemed to detest the sidebar and refused to even contemplate using it ..

You can't please all the people all the time ..

not mentioning bitching about it as "useless" "waste of space " "bloats"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!