• 0

Safe to remove Adobe Reader setup files?


Question

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  TEX4S said:
why on earth does anyone use that fat bloated slow software anyway ??!?!?!

use foxit a never look back !

www.foxitsoftware.com

Oh...and welcome to neowin !

Somewhere along the lines, FoxIt added advertisements to their application. So, the speed boost over adobe reader (which is now, as mentioned above, largely non-existant) was replaced by advertising in your PDF reader. I understand the need to have ads, but it's annoying to the average Joe. And, I'm sure they're removable...but, really, I'd rather not deal with that at all.

  • 0
  Aeden said:
Somewhere along the lines, FoxIt added advertisements to their application. So, the speed boost over adobe reader (which is now, as mentioned above, largely non-existant) was replaced by advertising in your PDF reader. I understand the need to have ads, but it's annoying to the average Joe. And, I'm sure they're removable...but, really, I'd rather not deal with that at all.

Oh damn, I didnt know that - its been awhile since Ive used a .pdf file - and I didnt upgrade to the latest version -

thats a shame - foxit was some software I recommended to many people - oh well...

  • 0
  TEX4S said:
Oh damn, I didnt know that - its been awhile since Ive used a .pdf file - and I didnt upgrade to the latest version -

thats a shame - foxit was some software I recommended to many people - oh well...

yeah its not really needed anymore with the improvements in 8.1 and 9.0 to speed. Heck, I have the full version of Acrobat 9 and when its open with no PDF's loaded its like 20MB of RAM, not too shabby and it starts really fast.

  • 0
  Aeden said:
was replaced by advertising in your PDF reader.
Yeah they are so obtrusive too :rolleyes:

post-14624-1231021686_thumb.jpg

Hmmm lets see abobe reader 33MB download.. foxit 3.7MB -- which one is bloated? ;)

Ok -- I just grabbed the latest adobe.. And sorry it takes atleast a couple of seconds longer to open the same exact pdf. And here -- same pdf opened.. which one is using more memory, handles, etc. Use what you want -- I will live with thos ads ;) vs the bloat that is adobe.

post-14624-1231022280_thumb.jpg

Take a look at the install dir.. 198MB for adobe, less than 10MB for foxit reader.. I say your still ok with suggesting it as a valid alternative ;)

Edited by BudMan
  • 0

Why not do like I used to do-- I used to create a folder to put it in -- with a text file explaining the where it was on my xp install-- then when that folder hits close to 700mb -- burn it to a cd. Just don't forget should you have to repair to copy it back over to the folder you referenced in the text file. (you don't have to create a separate txt file for each moved file -- just append it) that and after you copy it back over change the read only status. That is what I used to do.

But if you are looking for a good program to get rid of "JUNK" files- I suggest CCLEANER.

http://www.ccleaner.com/

Also another handy tool- though make sure that before you use this other program that you copy all the backups files located in your windows direcetory- (burn them to a cd)

Main site-

http://www.dougknox.com/

Hotfix backup removal tool-

http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm

  • 0

The bigger problem with foxiet than the "banner" is that there's some pdf's it just can't handle and it gives very aliased nasty text though.

other than hat the only time I use PDF's anyway is when I look in ig manuals or soemthing, wich usually was back when I worked support. at wich point the search in adober reader is a million times better than foxit.

FoxIt is a great little software, but despite it's flaws and annoying features it insists on installing along with itself, it is a much better software.

and I'd just remove, them though I probably wouldn't know they're there though. but by the time you need them if something should happen, there's probably a new version to download anyway :)

  • 0
  BudMan said:
Yeah they are so obtrusive too :rolleyes:

post-14624-1231021686_thumb.jpg

Hmmm lets see abobe reader 33MB download.. foxit 3.7MB -- which one is bloated? ;)

Ok -- I just grabbed the latest adobe.. And sorry it takes atleast a couple of seconds longer to open the same exact pdf. And here -- same pdf opened.. which one is using more memory, handles, etc. Use what you want -- I will live with thos ads ;) vs the bloat that is adobe.

post-14624-1231022280_thumb.jpg

Take a look at the install dir.. 198MB for adobe, less than 10MB for foxit reader.. I say your still ok with suggesting it as a valid alternative ;)

Eh, Reader 9 still flies on older computer anyhow. And if one has to be concerned with the installer eating up a lot of the space of the actual folder in this day and age, well, you must be running like a 10GB or something hard drive. :) I still get your point though hehe. I guess I don't care much even though I am running on smaller drives being I use raptors over 7200PM on my desktop. :)

Now only if MS would build it into the OS like Mac OS X...oh wait, lawsuit, nevermind! :)

  • 0
  BudMan said:
Yeah they are so obtrusive too :rolleyes:

Now that you mention it, I went ahead and checked up, and sure enough, the ads are (now) able to be turned off. The ads were very much obtrusive back in August, it seems they got the message and changed things. I'm only on Windows now and again; my bad.

  Quote
17. How to remove the Ads?

You can remove the Ads quite easily by selecting the "View" menu and unchecking the "Advertisement".

  • 0

the problem i find with foxit is that the text is often not very clear wheras adobe 9 the text is very clear and the space those setup files is negligable so i would not remove them as they may be needed later and if you delete them and say the updater needs them you would have to reinstall adobe just to get them back and those ads in foxit are annoying(i dunno why foxit added them)adobe used to be slow but now it seems they have learned and made it fast.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Same, we had Macs. I had no trouble transitioning though.
    • Visual Studio Professional 2022 + The Premium Learn to Code Bundle drops to lowest price by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save $1,960 on this Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2022 + The 2024 Premium Learn to Code Certification Bundle. This deal consists of the following items: Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2022 Learn to Code with Python 3 CHATGPT Series: OPENAI Fundamentals 2024 MySQL & SQL for Beginners The Complete Python Course: Learn Python by Doing in 2024 Google Assistant Automation IoT Development Computer Vision & Deep Learning with OpenCV and Python: Build 15 Projects JavaScript Complete Guide with Practical JavaScript Projects Web Development with Vuex (2024) Flutter & Dart: Complete Flutter Dart Programming Course Java Programming for Complete Beginners Salesforce Platform App Builder Certification Training ChatGPT for Salesforce Development 2024 Complete Ruby on Rails 6 Bootcamp Game Development and Coding for Kids 14 coding courses and nearly 244 hours of content.Here's deal: This Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2022 + The 2024 Premium Learn to Code Certification Bundle normally costs $1,999, but you can pick it up for just $55.97 for a limited time, that's a saving of $1,943 (97%) off. For a full description, specs, and instructor info, click the link below. Use MSO8 when checking out for additional $8 off. Coupon Expires June 29. Get this bundle deal for just $41.97, or learn more Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • I still use "Everything Search" for all my device searches including OneDrive. It just got another update. Extremely fast because when you open it for the first time after a Windows Boot it caches everything. Takes a few seconds, but from the 2nd open on it finds all searches in real time as you type what you are searching for in the search area.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      HarryTaylor earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      HarryTaylor earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      habso earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      658
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      246
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      233
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      148
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!