PS3 sales up 130 per cent during Christmas


Recommended Posts

A Sony Computer Entertainment America exec has said sales of PS3 were up by more than 130 per cent during the festive period.

"We've had a solid holiday season and have delivered consistent growth throughout this year," said sales vice president Ian Jackson, in a statement to CNET.

He described 2008 as "a pivotal year for PlayStation" with "the best software line-up in the industry" on offer.

"Early internal data points to an increase of more than 130 per cent of PS3 hardware sales for the holiday season - since Black Friday - and we're also seeing a growth of nearly 40 per cent in total PS3 hardware sales for the calendar year," Jackson continued. "We remain confident this momentum will continue into the new year."

As the CNET article points out, PS3 sales were down by 18.8 per cent for November 2008 compared to the same month a year previously. Xbox 360 sales were up by 8.6 per cent, while the figure for Wii rose by 108 per cent.

But Sony said this was an anomaly, blaming "an abnormally strong month due to a price cut (with) the introduction of the 40GB PS3".

Source - Eurogamer

He described 2008 as "a pivotal year for PlayStation" with "the best software line-up in the industry" on offer.

Disagree big time. I even know for a fact that people who said they would enjoy the line up more on the PS3 this season, were signed into XBL and playing 360 games more (I was there with them on WaW ;)). Talking about dual console owners btw. That's quite a contrast when many of them believed that it had the stronger line up.

Launching R2 up against GoW2 was a big mistake, they should have learnt from first time around in 2006 (N)

Pivotal and changing year for the PS3, agreed, but not what it was hyped up to be at the start of the year (and end of 2007).

Ok I'm going to ask again, do you actually offer anything to this community Jeremy? You're probably double the post count since I last asked and still trolling the boards and causing nothing but grief.

At least my reply offers discussion for people to start a discussion with me.

I can't wait until you're banned from NW. You know it's coming right? :)

Critically, probably the strongest line-up, MGS4 and LBP have been cleaning up quite a few awards (two highest rated titles on metacritic also).

However the minute we start arguing opinions, everyone is going to blast off with a different perception of who's software was "better"... So really, ignore the PR, or we'll see this topic turn into yet another stupid 360 vs PS3 argument.

Anyway, good year for every console (that we should all agree with), much better PS3 software than last, they just need affordability now. So the price cut better be soon into 2009 or else all the seemingly good software lined up for 09, is going to have a high price barrier to entry for many.

So your measure for "best line-up" is whether or not people are playing games online?! That's ridiculous.

No they obviously want to avoid the best games out there and play the crap ones instead :rolleyes:

And again, this is a comparison of some of the "hardcore" crowd here on Neowin, not the entire install base. I think its far more interesting to talk about trends here at NW, since you know, we're actually members here..

Wow huge news, they sold more over xmas. You would expect sales to be higher, it's not news. Doesn't change the fact it got absolutely eclipsed by 360 sales. It'll only get further behind until they finally relent and have a price cut, by which time the other consoles will be ready for another one anyway.

I would disagree it has the strongest software line up -- MGS4 and LBP but nothing else.

So your measure for "best line-up" is whether or not people are playing games online?! That's ridiculous.

Yet he says I'm the one trolling.

DM, as for a ban, when I break the rules I will expect one. Until then, stop trying to play moderator.

Wow huge news, they sold more over xmas. You would expect sales to be higher, it's not news. Doesn't change the fact it got absolutely eclipsed by 360 sales. It'll only get further behind until they finally relent and have a price cut, by which time the other consoles will be ready for another one anyway.

I would disagree it has the strongest software line up -- MGS4 and LBP but nothing else.

The PS3 sales are doing just fine. They have sold more per year than the 360 and as the 360 is less than half the price, that aint bad going is it.

As for software, depends - your opinion is that, other people will say it has.

Yet he says I'm the one trolling.

DM, as for a ban, when I break the rules I will expect one. Until then, stop trying to play moderator.

Yes you are the troll, or maybe you think your post deserves post of the year? All 2 lines of it :/

As for software, depends - your opinion is that, other people will say it has.

And like I said, as for NW, the majority of members around here were by far signed into XBL playing games more than the PS3.

I don't think one successful holiday season will put Sony at the top of the console market. They've hard more than enough time to listen to the community and rectify their mistakes. But alas, Sony was being Sony and kept their eyes on their own agenda. It's a shame because the PS3 really is a powerful machine, but not groundbreaking enough for me (or anyone else I know) to make room for it in the budget. It still has potential, but until there's a strong, consistent demand, it will be nothing more than a fancy Blu-Ray player to me.

They have sold more per year than the 360

Uh, no they haven't, unless you're talking solely about Japan, but that an exception, not the rule. The 360 has the PS3 dominated in NA, and it's edging it out in Europe so I really would love to know what you're talking about.

Anyways, it's nice to hear some good news about PS3 sales, even if it's what we'd expect.

-Spenser

Well they are up, and it was expected coming from a PR. It won't unleash a comeback to batter the Wii and 360, but it would be interesting to see the revenue each company has generated from the consoles. This may be slightly closer with the same results. As the PS3 was so overpriced and was a do-it-all machine, no one really bothered and went for the cheaper options of the 360 and Wii. There's no point looking at sales when the consoles are at such varied prices.

@Bri- : I think you're absolutely right. And I heard that the processer is only using 3 of the 5+ cores on the cell on current gen games. Can anyone enlighten me on this subject and actually tell me if its actually true? Because if it is, there definitely is some potential in that machine.

Uh, no they haven't, unless you're talking solely about Japan, but that an exception, not the rule. The 360 has the PS3 dominated in NA, and it's edging it out in Europe so I really would love to know what you're talking about.

Anyways, it's nice to hear some good news about PS3 sales, even if it's what we'd expect.

-Spenser

I see all these articles saying how well the Xbox 360 is selling having now reached its landmark of 28 Million consoles since its release in December 05.

I also see loads of articles talking about how the PS3 is failing fast and is a sales flop since its release in December 06 having only sold 20 million consoles worldwide.

Now correct me if im wrong but it is now January 09, therefore the 360 has sold around 9 million consoles a year since its release, however the PS3 has sold 10 million per year has it not?? If this is the case then someone please tell me why the PS3 is failing??

p.s I have both consoles and like them both equally, however these articles bashing Sony really annoy me because they are false, because as far as I can see the PS3 is far from failing.

Really? This ^ seems to be the case and if so, how can the 360 be outselling it worldwide?

Actually, don't bother answering as I don't care. I own a Ps3, I'm more than happy with it, and I don't own shares in either Sony or Microsoft.

When you want drama you visit sales threads, that's why we have so much drama going on here - https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=718216

Oh wait, I'm wrong, I mean - https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=718256

Got my sections mixed up there... :rolleyes:

Seriously guys, stop the fighting. DL said he hoped the Sony section would be less of a warzone in 2009, the SONY section, not the GH.

These are just Christmas sales topics, a time to say well done Sony/MS/Nintendo for making so many people happy at Christmas, not another ****ing "my console is better than yours" bitch fest. Think about all the happy kids at Christmas!

Seriously, lets try cleanup this place and get along better for 2009. There's a time and place for comparing till your fingers bleed, contrary to belief that is not in EVERY topic in the Sony section :laugh:

And no, don't play the PR card, every company thinks their lineup is the best every year, they aren't offending your console of choice, don't worry - Take it from me instead, every console had awesome games this year (well, my Wii... auch, I said no console wars, so I ain't going there :p)

@Bri- : I think you're absolutely right. And I heard that the processer is only using 3 of the 5+ cores on the cell on current gen games. Can anyone enlighten me on this subject and actually tell me if its actually true? Because if it is, there definitely is some potential in that machine.

I well suspect this could be true certainly for some games. Remember if I recall the PS3 GUI/OS consumes 2-3 cores iteself and these are permantly reserved for its exclusive use.

The big issue is though games done need raw cpu performance they need graphics card power which is one reason the xbox 360 generally looks as good as the ps3 as the gcard chip is much better in the xbox.

Also a mate who is a games dev says its hard to make games for multicore. Unreal engine 3 helped as it does multicore well and developers need to worry less as the ground work has been done to split the tasks/processes out to each core.

I tbh dont think a *revolution* will come when/if they decide the use the *spare* cores as developers have a hugely hard time programming for the PS3 currently (his words as well as mine) due to sony being terrible at documentation/help for developers. Its one reason the xbox is so popular because MS have a well implemented programming language with lots of support/documentation.

The PS3 sales are doing just fine. They have sold more per year than the 360 and as the 360 is less than half the price, that aint bad going is it.

I beg to differ. MS has

I doubt that as NPD have stated for quite a few months now the PS3 sales are less then the 360 and even still the 360 has sold approx 28million consoles to sonys 16million (and thats including people who only bought it as it was cheap blue ray back in the day)

I did hear the PS3 had terrible sales year on year (for December) though and that it was actually down a few percent so until NPD come out with stats (which I know is only USA) I think its PR spin. I personally know no one that bought a ps3 this Christmas where tons got xbox's as they are so cheap.

Really? This ^ seems to be the case and if so, how can the 360 be outselling it worldwide?

Actually, don't bother answering as I don't care. I own a Ps3, I'm more than happy with it, and I don't own shares in either Sony or Microsoft.

Please stop spouting FUD without taking the time to hear a rebuttal.

XBox360 - 27.21M

PS3 -19.31M

http://vgchartz.com/

Really? This ^ seems to be the case and if so, how can the 360 be outselling it worldwide?

Actually, don't bother answering as I don't care. I own a Ps3, I'm more than happy with it, and I don't own shares in either Sony or Microsoft.

You can't gauge the market based on averages. The 360 didn't sell close to 9 mil it's first year on the market. Every year the PS3 has been out, the 360 has sold more, and if it keeps doing that, the PS3 won't catch up.

-Spenser

What else do you think a Sony PR person is going to say?
Ok I'm going to ask again, do you actually offer anything to this community Jeremy? You're probably double the post count since I last asked and still trolling the boards and causing nothing but grief.

Jeremy has a point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!