Anyone want a QUAKE LIVE invite?


Recommended Posts

Well the engine used for COD4 is based on the COD2 engine, which way way back was slightly based on the Q3 engine.

But no, COD4 isn't really based on the Q3 engine at all, maybe it has some old similar code from COD2.

Actually, it is. IW has used the Quake engine as the underlying coding structure through their games, even Call of Duty 4 shares similar coding methods and file structure.

BUT, it has nothing to do with the graphics or gameplay, that is up to the developers to form and shape.

Actually, it is. IW has used the Quake engine as the underlying coding structure through their games, even Call of Duty 4 shares similar coding methods and file structure.

BUT, it has nothing to do with the graphics or gameplay, that is up to the developers to form and shape.

yup, same engine, different textures and some tweaked coding.

More than "some" tweaking, it'd be fairer to say that the engine borrows heavily from Q3's engine structure and design than anything else. I mean, Valve's source engine is based on the Half-life 1 engine, which is based on the Quake 2 engine, but you wouldn't say Source == Quake 2 outrightly.

At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter, Quake live is just as fast-paced and crazy as Quake 3 was back in the day. I should know, I suck at it!

Actually, it is. IW has used the Quake engine as the underlying coding structure through their games, even Call of Duty 4 shares similar coding methods and file structure.

BUT, it has nothing to do with the graphics or gameplay, that is up to the developers to form and shape.

Well thats what I figured, because I know the config setups are organized are very similar to Quake 3. But I really don't think the engine is based on the Q3 engine whatsoever.

Even when you look at the doom and quake engine, their file structure is pretty similar and things like cvars, etc. Although the engines are completely different.

IMO, I think it just has more to do with the developers being trained with the Q3 engine, maybe it makes it easier for them to structure the coding like Q3, idk.

The same commands work, the same tweaks work, and the same odd engine glitches exist. In quake 3, its optimal to max your fps to 125, its an odd thing, but many old schoolers will agree, it enables you to make jumps that normally you cant.

The engine seems to run the same, just that really its bigger textures and different ai and other tweaks. But other than that, the engine really still seems quite similar to the quake3 game still.

I havent played this back since 2000. Quake Con was awesome back then.

Does this version allow for Rocket Arena settings?

Whoa, settle down there tiger.

Quake 3 was and is an average hyper-shooter which only had its looks going for it back in the good old day, in my opinion. I am just afraid that when you take away the looks all you are left with is a pretty meh shooter. And don't lecture me on games, specially not with you being 14 years old, I played games before you were even born.

My age doesn't mean anything, and you should know that being how old you are. You say it like graphics means alot. It's not like we're toying with an engine equivalent to Doom's or Aleph One. This is a fully 3D and stable first person shooter. It's engine is no different from the Source engine save for its prettiness and physics. Its textures are now the equivalent to what we've seen in 2004. I'm afraid you seem to think that this shooter has absolutely no graphical value to it whatsoever.

It's about the gameplay not the graphics. And your opinion about an "average hyper shooter" is an opinion and nothing else. I recall Quake3 being used in plenty of tournaments and events, equal to that of UT.

My age doesn't mean anything, and you should know that being how old you are. You say it like graphics means alot. It's not like we're toying with an engine equivalent to Doom's or Aleph One. This is a fully 3D and stable first person shooter. It's engine is no different from the Source engine save for its prettiness and physics. It's models are now the equivilant to what we've seen in 2004. I'm afraid you seem to think that this shooter has absolutely no graphical value to it whatsoever.

It's about the gameplay not the graphics. And your opinion about an "average hyper shooter" is an opinion and nothing else. I recall Quake3 being used in plenty of tournaments and events, equal to that of UT.

Wait, are you comparing it to the Source engine and then just listing the things it doesn't feature, plus you even list two of the biggest aspects of the Source engine, pathetic :rofl:

I can't take the rest of your post serious after a comparison like that. ( Not that your post made any sense in the first place, damn :| )

It's a great game with almost near perfect online coding and hit detection.

It pits players against each other, in an equal setting, in a world with set physics to it. those who learn those physics, can become a neo sort of in the game, moving quickly from place to place, and even knowing where to track others. It really is a game of sort of learning and skill to it, which makes it great for those with a competitive nature.

Wait, are you comparing it to the Source engine and then just listing the things it doesn't feature, plus you even list two of the biggest aspects of the Source engine, pathetic :rofl:

I can't take the rest of your post serious after a comparison like that. ( Not that your post made any sense in the first place, damn :| )

..

I listed the only two things that are superior about the Source engine, thus (sadly) attempting to prove how the Source engine is simply superior in those two areas, and Quake 3 is the same thing minus a little bit on both.

Physics in Quake 3 don't matter as much as they do in Half Life 2. For instance, if you strip away the gravity gun and the ragdolls, you end up without a need for such a complex physics engine like Havoc. Quake's physics would then fit perfectly in its place.

On the other hand, you're left with the graphics. A graphics engine only plays a part in functionality to a certain point. You can only utilize the graphics to differentiate between, for example, two different enemies, or two different guns. Once you hit that point, the development of shaders and textures become virtually pointless other than to serve as eye candy. Of course, this is not entirely true seeing as Crysis takes advantage of destructable structures and hiding in grass, and Splinter Cell hides in the shadows. But if you're smart enough, you see my point. And plus, this isn't a Crysis type of shooter.

I should have revised before I posted, that was a silly comparison. So let me take that sentence out and let's see if you can read it.

My age doesn't mean anything, and you should know that being how old you are. You say it like graphics means alot. It's not like we're toying with an engine equal to Doom's or Aleph One. This is a fully 3D and stable first person shooter. Its textures are now the equivalent to what we've seen in 2004. I'm afraid you seem to think that this shooter has absolutely no graphical value to it whatsoever.

It's about the gameplay not the graphics. And your opinion about an "average hyper shooter" is an opinion and nothing else. I recall Quake3 being used in plenty of tournaments and events, equal to that of UT.

Edited by Recon415

It's back up, but my invites are gone, I was only able to give 1 of the 5 out =\

Sorry guys, particularly Blindlabel013, PricklyPoo and shakey who all literally missed out on it by a few seconds (The time between me going to the invite section and pasting their emails to the time QL went down).

If my invites return, those 3 will be the first in line.

EDIT: That was quick! You guys got your invites after all. So did Jase.

1 invite left! Next POSTER gets it!

..

I listed the only two things that are superior about the Source engine, thus (sadly) attempting to prove how the Source engine is simply superior in those two areas, and Quake 3 is the same thing minus a little bit on both.

Physics in Quake 3 don't matter as much as they do in Half Life 2. For instance, if you strip away the gravity gun and the ragdolls, you end up without a need for such a complex physics engine like Havoc. Quake's physics would then fit perfectly in its place.

On the other hand, you're left with the graphics. A graphics engine only plays a part in functionality to a certain point. You can only utilize the graphics to differentiate between, for example, two different enemies, or two different guns. Once you hit that point, the development of shaders and textures become virtually pointless other than to serve as eye candy. Of course, this is not entirely true seeing as Crysis takes advantage of destructable structures and hiding in grass, and Splinter Cell hides in the shadows. But if you're smart enough, you see my point. And plus, this isn't a Crysis type of shooter.

I should have revised before I posted, that was a silly comparison. So let me take that sentence out and let's see if you can read it.

I'm sorry but your posts are a joke. I don't think I've seen such daft arguments in my whole life? You constantly just strip away features from engines and they say "There, now you are left with the Quake engine". Yes, take engine graphics engine and remove features, you are basically going to end up with a simple 3D engine. That's how engines evolve today, by adding features and improving the graphical side of the engine by the use of advanced effects, improving textures, mimicking real-life effects etc. There's a reason why big companies like AMD ( ATi ) and nVidia pumps out out GPUs every other month and people actually buy them. There's a reason why new consoles are launched every few years, there is a reason why games are constantly pushing the envelope on the graphical side - Because people actually care. Gameplay and graphics go hand in hand, like it or not. Also, you need to reword that entire post to make me read it, I had people approaching me on messenger laughing at the post because it sounds like it's written by a seagull.

The above was aimed at FPS / TPS games mostly because they are the games trying to create user immersion by getting close to realistic looks.

And just to make it perfectly clear, I can play games with older graphics engine. My concerns about this game was the fact that I never really got into the "Quake" gameplay and combined with inferior graphics, I wasn't sure whether I'd like it or not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!