Quad-core iPhones with GPGPU acceleration and firmware 3.0?


Recommended Posts

Not according to the last six months. Outmoded, dinosaur thinking.

Check out what's hot in the App Store.

The iPhone gaming paradigm, even at this early stage, is huge.

Like I've been saying for a while now - moving parts, buttons, dials, knobs, levers, LOL, you name it, are gradually being phased out. And the funny thing is, this push not necessarily coming from the big consoles, but from smaller handhelds. Everyone wants in on an App Store-like feature, and developers are flocking to it.

i highly disagree with u. most of the iphone games, besides simple ones like tetris and card games, are not at all revolutionizing mobile games. I never intended to use my iphone for heavy gaming use, but the "action" games I have played are very cumbersome and lacking the proper controls to really have fun with them. Besides that, my fingers take up 1/3 of the screen because I have to be touching the screen with them to move the character, etc. around..

It will be a sad day for mobile gaming if buttons are EVER phased out completely. Now what would be cool is if apple was open to the idea of adding sleek buttons for games or other tasks. it wouldn't tarnish the iphone for me at all...

Now on the REAL topic, quad core phone would be a great advancement , but really how many people will be needing to use pc applications ona 3.5" screen? And plus, I just bought my 3G! :(

QC for a phone , OverKill :ermm: :blink:
Why?

The old Creative Zen Vision:M that I still have do have a Dual Core CPU inside...

It's not a QuadCore like you see in PCs...

defintely an overkill :)

iphone needs a bit better cpu/gpu and definately more memory (both space and os memory), and it will do fine.

its phone after all not gaming console.

unless they are making something else.

Keep talking, before you know it the physical keyboard and mouse will be gone too. Microsoft Surface, the iPhone, all the other companies scrambling to come up with touch control devices. LTD might be looking a bit far into the future but he's right. Physical buttons as we know it are a dying breed.

lol, the keyboard has been around for probably 100 years, and you seem to think a few new products are going to all of the sudden replace it.

Sounds interesting. Multiple cores would work well if Apple decides to allow multiprocessing.
I bet it's the goal of going multicore, because let face it, one of the biggest default of the iphone right now is being unable to do 2 things except for the music. And this sucks.

Safari at least need it, loading pages in background should be a requirement...

its phone after all not gaming console.
The iTouch is now targeted as a mobile gaming device as well. Apple really pushed it.

And I use more my iTouch to play games than doing music :rofl:

http://www.apple.com/ca/ipodtouch/

Look how mush games are presented on the page.

The iTouch is now targeted as a mobile gaming device as well. Apple really pushed it.

And I use more my iTouch to play games than doing music :rofl:

http://www.apple.com/ca/ipodtouch/

Look how mush games are presented on the page.

I completely forgot about ipod touch :p in any case i dont see many games which could utilise such power. even f you have breathtaking 3d graphics you still dont have proper controls :p

QC for a phone , OverKill :ermm: :blink:

No it's not. My 4+ year old iPod is a dual-core system. And the fact is, you get much better performance/power and performance/silicon when you use many simple cores as opposed to fewer complex ones. The cost of this however, is increased software complexity which isn't as big of a problem as it was 10+ years ago now that we have tools like OpenCL, Open MP, and better compilers, and even just better education into parallel computing.

Touchscreens have been around longer than Apple they were just the first company to do it right, its just like anything gadgety there will always be a "thing" or new fad of the moment, first it was laptops, then the 'origami' UMPCs, now netbooks, then it will be the MIDs(mobile internet devices).

Unless someone comes up with a radical new UI/Input Format tactile buttons will never go away and no amount of gushing over how great Apple is and how far they can see into the future wont change that fact.

To jump in on this debate IMHO the death of the keyboard won't come with the rise of touch screens but rather the day voice recognition if good enough to work first time every time with basically any person and accent out there without the user needing to train the system beforehand. That and the technology has to be able to work around things like speech impediments, stuttering and the like that many users may have as a condition or may just do occasionally even.

Really touch screens are nice but things like surface are really technologies that are replacing the mouse, not the keyboard. They aren't and likely never will be a device that you can use without line of sight so to that extent they are best suited to drag and drop actions and the like as opposed to typing where users expect to be able to achieve a high thoroughput with minimal effort.

So yeah, I personally do see touch screens becomming the norm but keyboards will still remain for typing until such a time as voice recognition is able to take over. Even then there are issues like how do you manage 50 people in an office apartment all talking to their pc's at once? Obviously it can be done since many places are like that only with phones but it would be a concern that may hamper uptake.

I guess the alternative is stylus taking over but I'd argue a stylus isn't necessarily making a typist job any easier. I do think the keyboard will remain until voice communication is common. I doubt we are THAT far away either.

Well I didn't say it above but the extension from that is it should be natural language. So it should be taken to a level where you can say "untar file XYZ to my images directory" or whatever. Obviously we are a bit further away to that that just voice recognition, but once the computer can understand natural language the keyboard will become alot less necessary.

It'll have a place mind still for a long time.

Not according to the last six months. Outmoded, dinosaur thinking.

Check out what's hot in the App Store.

The iPhone gaming paradigm, even at this early stage, is huge.

these products didn't exist when dinosaur's were around...so how could they be thinking about it :p

the iphone is a horrible at playing games the controls are just weak no feedback (hell even a little vibration would do for positive feedback) if people are gonna sit around all day playing games on their iphone they should just jump on a computer were atleast the controls are decent and worth the time

gaming on the iphone is just a nice thing to look at..for a few seconds

Like I've been saying for a while now - moving parts, buttons, dials, knobs, levers, LOL, you name it, are gradually being phased out. And the funny thing is, this push not necessarily coming from the big consoles, but from smaller handhelds. Everyone wants in on an App Store-like feature, and developers are flocking to it.

that while is going to last throughout your entire life :p

for low priority stuff yeah touch screen is great but for everyday use buttons/knobs/dials(arn't they the same thing? :p)/levers will all remain in use

like a studio would want to swap out all their mixer boards for a digital display analogue input ftw

Well I didn't say it above but the extension from that is it should be natural language. So it should be taken to a level where you can say "untar file XYZ to my images directory" or whatever. Obviously we are a bit further away to that that just voice recognition, but once the computer can understand natural language the keyboard will become alot less necessary.

It'll have a place mind still for a long time.

programmers will not want to sit there talking to their computer all day...not ever....in a block of code you'll see the words "****ing piece of ****" and other profanities mostly directed to the clients which wouldn't be good for the client to see :p

Not according to the last six months. Outmoded, dinosaur thinking.

Check out what's hot in the App Store.

The iPhone gaming paradigm, even at this early stage, is huge.

Like I've been saying for a while now - moving parts, buttons, dials, knobs, levers, LOL, you name it, are gradually being phased out. And the funny thing is, this push not necessarily coming from the big consoles, but from smaller handhelds. Everyone wants in on an App Store-like feature, and developers are flocking to it.

It?s not dinosaur thinking... it?s simply terrible to use a hard glass screen to press buttons as fast and accurately as many games need to be controled. Touching is not always good... thats why theres also the *pressing* action.

Some people want to look soooo modern themselves that they start to look ridiculous.

To jump in on this debate IMHO the death of the keyboard won't come with the rise of touch screens but rather the day voice recognition if good enough to work first time every time with basically any person and accent out there without the user needing to train the system beforehand. That and the technology has to be able to work around things like speech impediments, stuttering and the like that many users may have as a condition or may just do occasionally even.

I don't think voice recognition will ever be mainstream enough to kill keyboards, for two reasons:

1. Privacy. People wouldn't feel comfortable with everyone knowing what they are doing at every moment. A bit like why almost no one uses video calls over regular phone calls.

2. It just wouldn't work if there's more people around. Just imagine a crowded office, it would be utterly annoying.

Well I didn't say it above but the extension from that is it should be natural language. So it should be taken to a level where you can say "untar file XYZ to my images directory" or whatever. Obviously we are a bit further away to that that just voice recognition, but once the computer can understand natural language the keyboard will become alot less necessary.

It'll have a place mind still for a long time.

That's more AI than voice recognition. Voice recognition turns the sounds into words, it doesn't assign them meaning.

And even then, what about games, "Go forward 20 meters, turn to 45 degrees right, go forward 20 meters" would be different depending on every game, they might share the same units if they're the same engine, but going from HL2 to Bioshock won't work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!