Google services new favicon.ico


Recommended Posts

I like it, although I think it's maybe wayyyy to colourful for something like Google which has the worst website design I have ever seen! The last favicon went with their boring, disgusting layout much better than this one.

I wish they would update their layout to go with this new favicon and be less 'minimal' and I might actually start liking Google!

Even Microsoft Live Search got rid of their beautiful interface become more 'minimalistic' to please the lovers of Google's disgustingly minimal user interface! :/ (although Microsoft did their 'minimal' design better, it's a shame Google's relevance in search results seems better).

I like it, although I think it's maybe wayyyy to colourful for something like Google which has the worst website design I have ever seen! The last favicon went with their boring, disgusting layout much better than this one.

I wish they would update their layout to go with this new favicon and be less 'minimal' and I might actually start liking Google!

Even Microsoft Live Search got rid of their beautiful interface become more 'minimalistic' to please the lovers of Google's disgustingly minimal user interface! :/ (although Microsoft did their 'minimal' design better, it's a shame Google's relevance in search results seems better).

what the hell crawled up your ass? lol

Their minimalistic design is one of the reasons Google is where it is today.

Unfortunately, yes.

I have no problems with where Google is today, I just don't understand why so many people like awful designs so much and why so many people do not find it ugly :s

Before they introduced themes, Gmail was even uglier!

what the hell crawled up your ass? lol

Just that the design is so ugly :p

It's got to the point that I hate using Google Search it is that ugly, yet I choose to use it for the relevance of its results.

I think the new favicon shows potential for a nicer logo and even just a nicer design (although I know they wouldn't :/).

Look at cuil Search for an example of a nicer design. (I say nicer but I feel with those four colours, Google could make an even better design).

I don't see the problem with the google website or lives really. Theres a huge distinction to be made between minimalistic and ugly and they aren't mutually inclusive of one another.

I do think the new icon is as ugly as sin but. It doesn't match the site in the slightest. It wasn't until I got home that I even realised that there was a "g" there in the icon...all I saw were random blobs which didn't fit the sites white design.

edit: cJr, if your a firefox user you *may* be interested in the "Stylish" extension for firefox. It lets you apply style sheets to change the look and color of sites. Many of the templates are available for Google and may add a bit of spice to the page if you do truly detest it. I used to have a very nice dark navy blue background one at one point.

Look at cuil Search for an example of a nicer design. (I say nicer but I feel with those four colours, Google could make an even better design).

Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a great design!!!!!!!!!! I'm blown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:blink:

black bg with the word cuil , 2 colors...yea.. its a winner.

I don't see the problem with the google website or lives really. Theres a huge distinction to be made between minimalistic and ugly and they aren't mutually inclusive of one another.

I do think the new icon is as ugly as sin but. It doesn't match the site in the slightest. It wasn't until I got home that I even realised that there was a "g" there in the icon...all I saw were random blobs which didn't fit the sites white design.

edit: cJr, if your a firefox user you *may* be interested in the "Stylish" extension for firefox. It lets you apply style sheets to change the look and color of sites. Many of the templates are available for Google and may add a bit of spice to the page if you do truly detest it. I used to have a very nice dark navy blue background one at one point.

Thanks, I've used Stylish scripts before but none were that good (although much better than Google's current design). I may check them out again and try a few :) Thank you for reminding me :)

Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a great design!!!!!!!!!! I'm blown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:blink:

black bg with the word cuil , 2 colors...yea.. its a winner.

Haha! I actually realised on my way to work I did not use a good example with the 'cuil' site. I hate dark designs most of the time and cuil is even worse with it's pure blackness.

I was thinking more along the lines of W3C XHTML Validator website, Facebook's design, or even Windows Live Wave 3 design. All are minimal enough and load up straight away, even on slow connections, yet they all look nice and are a pleasure to use (even though some could be better, these are just merely 'nice'). Google on the other hand, whilst very minimalistic is just ugly. It is pure white with a few horribly coloured blue links in random places.

What exactly is that? Some plant with blue leaves in a yellow pot, with some freaky green with red background?

edit: Oh, alright. With a little zoom in, I now see the white "g".

Pretty weird fav icon. I liked the previous blue one better. It was clear what you were looking at on high resolutions.

Edited by Pupik
I like it compared to the one they recently changed it to (the plain lowercase "g"). I still like their old capital "G" logo in a box best, though, as it reminds me of the actual company logo.

I prefered the big G as well as it was instantly recognizable as the first G in "Google". I'm not sure why they chose the ocon they did here, I think it would be more effective if they only used the one colour as it'd make the "g" more easy to notice. My eyes were drawn to the colour, not the white space which I personally believe means the icon is sending out the wrong message.

Anyone got a link to the ICO? I'm trying to implement it into my Firefox search bar.

Scirwode

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!