Microsoft postpones Windows 7 public beta


Recommended Posts

Microsoft Corp. postponed the roll-out of the Windows 7 beta today, citing "very heavy traffic" on its Web site.

The company did not offer a new schedule for delivering the beta of its newest operating system.

"Due to very heavy traffic we're seeing as a result of interest in the Windows 7 Beta, we are adding some additional infrastructure support to Microsoft.com properties before we post the public Beta today," a spokeswoman said in an instant message reply to earlier questions about the Microsoft.com's performance. "We want to ensure customers have the best possible experience when downloading the Beta."

On Wednesday, CEO Steve Ballmer promised that the beta would be released to the general public today. Later, a company spokeswoman said that Microsoft would post the beta today at noon PST.

Early Friday, however, several Microsoft domains, including the main page and the designated download site, were overwhelmed by users eager to grab the beta. Although those URLs were later revived, attempts by Computerworld and others to download Windows 7 from a TechNet page aimed at IT professionals have been stymied for several hours.

Users who have tried to download the beta have been greeted with messages such as "Server is too busy" and "This site is currently experiencing technical difficulties, please check back in the next business day."

The Microsoft spokeswoman did not know when users could expect to download the beta. "No ETA at this point," she said via a follow-up instant message.

Although Microsoft has said it would cap the number of Windows 7 beta activation keys at 2.5 million -- perhaps one of the reasons users felt a sense of urgency today about getting the download -- it is not expected to yank the download after that mark is reached. Users unable to obtain an activation key in the initial rush will still be able to download and install the beta, then run it under the operating system's 30-day trial.

By using the same "slmgr -rearm" command that gained notoriety after Windows Vista's debut, users can extend that trial period to a total of 120 days.

This is not the first time that Microsoft's run into problems offering beta code by download. In June 2006, after it launched Windows Vista Beta 2, it urged users to order a DVD copy of the preview rather than download, claiming that if it boosted its bandwidth enough to handle all the demand, it could cripple the Internet as a whole.

"We are literally saying that if we increased our bandwidth any further there's a possibility of taking down the Internet," an unidentified Microsoft representative told Dutch blogger Steven Bink at the time.

In 2006, Microsoft also reportedly considered, then rejected, distributing Vista Beta 2 using the BitTorrent file-sharing protocol.

Late last month, a copy of a 32-bit Windows 7 build -- later identified as the same as the beta Microsoft began offering developers this week -- leaked to BitTorrent sites. In the last 48 hours, the official beta -- apparently obtained from a subscriber to TechNet, one of Microsoft's paid services developers and IT professional -- has also appeared on BitTorrent sites.

Via: http://www.computerworld.com

I'd be cautious to give up. I doubt MS or its spokespersons release info to the press via IM.

Those IM quotes are word for word from Brandons blog post except for the word "today" added to the end which they used to run with the "postponed" headline.

Btw, Borimol...looks like your Vaio is cousin of my XPS. ;)

*Update on Windows 7 Beta Availability

Due to very heavy traffic we?re seeing as a result of interest in the Windows 7 Bet we are adding some additional infrastructure support to the Microsoft.com properties before we post the public beta. We want to ensure customers have the best possible b>experience when downloading the beta, and we will be updating this page once the beta goes live. Stay tuned! We are excited that you are excited!

That per both the developer and public win7 blogs. Notice the Computerworld writer uses quotes that are identitcal except conveniently "today' shows up. Just sayin....

I got my 7 by wading in the grey area...but its the keys I'm after.

Now, I'm reconsidering waiting it out...I mean, what happens after the 120 days? Does it allow me to revert to a previous Vista intall?

Why would you install this beta as your main OS? That's a big mistake. This is something you have to install only in a different hard drive, preferably unplugging all the other hard drives to prevent that bug from eating your MP3s before you apply the patch.

Why would you install this beta as your main OS? That's a big mistake. This is something you have to install only in a different hard drive, preferably unplugging all the other hard drives to prevent that bug from eating your MP3s before you apply the patch.

Because we aren't new users here. This is one of the most stable betas I have encountered in the past. Been using it as my main OS for a month now. Worst case scenario, I can put my Alitiris image of Vista 64 back on if need be.

Because we aren't new users here. This is one of the most stable betas I have encountered in the past. Been using it as my main OS for a month now. Worst case scenario, I can put my Alitiris image of Vista 64 back on if need be.

As stable as it may be, it's still a beta. Nobody should use a beta as their main OS.

As stable as it may be, it's still a beta. Nobody should use a beta as their main OS.

You are entitled to your own opinion, of course. But if someone wants to use this as their main OS, so be it. I have to agree with the poster above as well, this beta is very stable, minus a few issues here and there. Can't wait for the final.

I have a strong feeling majority of the downloads for Windows 7 will be one-time users. A quick browse around the Windows 7 environment, and a format back to Vista and or XP. Which, in essence, hurts those who are taking the time to download the ISO in order to contribute in feedback and debugging, dtrace, etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!