Recommended Posts

That should be no problem as long as you have a x64 cpu, which I assume you know.

The way I installed it was just use a partition tool to shrink your current partition and leave unpartition spaced. Once you start it up just install it to that space and it will do all the work for you....Install bootloader as needed and such.

I currently run Vista Home Premium. I am attempting to download the 32-bit ISO and get it burned to a DVD. Assuming I get a good burn, if I put the DVD into the drive to start the install, will I be presented with the opportunity to do a clean install instead of an upgrade?

That should be no problem as long as you have a x64 cpu, which I assume you know.

The way I installed it was just use a partition tool to shrink your current partition and leave unpartition spaced. Once you start it up just install it to that space and it will do all the work for you....Install bootloader as needed and such.

scratch42069 covered the answer to that question. You cannot upgrade from a 32-bit OS to a 64-bit OS. It has nothing to do with the CPU's ability to handle x86-64.

I currently run Vista Home Premium. I am attempting to download the 32-bit ISO and get it burned to a DVD. Assuming I get a good burn, if I put the DVD into the drive to start the install, will I be presented with the opportunity to do a clean install instead of an upgrade?

Yes. In fact, you should do a clean install as opposed to an upgrade.

Thanks a lot guys. I guess I will do a clean install of the 64-bit version.

Last question... what is the easiest way to downgrade? Like if I want to delete Windows 7 and only use Windows Vista?

No downgrade option. You'd have to wipe it and clean install Windows Vista. You should be set though. You have Windows Beta that will last till July, the first Release Candidate should be out by then. Add maybe 6-7 more months. By then it should be RTM.

No real need to go back to Windows Vista and you'll be best to help test Windows 7 and improve it as well.

You can only do that if you put all your data on a seperate disk. If you want to go back to Vista you just format your Windows 7 disk and install Vista on that disk. Your data disk doesn't get touched.

Yeah. Here is the thing. I am doing a clean install of Windows 7 and will be dual-booting WIndows 7 and Windows Vista.

Now if I want to uninstall Windows 7 and save my data... whats the best way of doing that?

Keep your data on a separate partition or drive? Keep it away from the OS to make it easy (which is what I should do, argh...)

If I were you, I'd put my user folders on a different partition. That way it'll survive through many OS installations. Folder redirection is as simple as drag and dropping folders from %USERPROFILE%. :yes:

You can only do that if you put all your data on a seperate disk. If you want to go back to Vista you just format your Windows 7 disk and install Vista on that disk. Your data disk doesn't get touched.

So you are saying I will have to put all my data on a seperate drive and then format windows 7 and install Vista?

Keep your data on a separate partition or drive? Keep it away from the OS to make it easy (which is what I should do, argh...)

Yeah. On a seperate drive I would imagine would be safer.

If I were you, I'd put my user folders on a different partition. That way it'll survive through many OS installations. Folder redirection is as simple as drag and dropping folders from %USERPROFILE%. :yes:

So right now all my user folders are in drive C:. If I install Vista in drive K then my user folders should automatically be there? So for me to keep the data, I put all my data in drive C. Then when I format Windows 7 (by formating you mean uninstalling? Or how?)... all my data will be fine?

Sorry for these late answers. Hope this might be helpful in case you haven't installed Win7 yet.

So you are saying I will have to put all my data on a seperate drive and then format windows 7 and install Vista?

See below...

So right now all my user folders are in drive C:. If I install Vista in drive K then my user folders should automatically be there? So for me to keep the data, I put all my data in drive C. Then when I format Windows 7 (by formating you mean uninstalling? Or how?)... all my data will be fine?

No, if you install Win7 in drive K, it'll recreate a new set of user folders at K:\Users\<yourname>\. Your existing Vista folders will remain in your C: drive.

But installing Win7 in a partition and giving it the drive letter K is not possible if you boot your Win7 disc following the startup POST beep. If you were to run the installer within Vista, then the installer will try to preserve your drive letters as they appear in Vista, so yes, your Win7 will rest on drive letter K. Otherwise, your Win7 drive will be C:, your other partitions (if any) will be assigned letters based on the age of the partitions, and your Vista partition won't be given a letter at all; you'll have to assign it one in Disk Management (diskmgmt.msc).

Now say you plan on dualbooting Windows 7 and Vista (and you should with beta OSes anyway, if you can afford the disk space) and you can't be bothered moving the data to another partition. Once you're done installing Win7, you could try "redirecting" your user folders to your Vista install, so that personal files saved while you're in Win7 won't disappear should you decide to wipe it off your hard drive. To do that, after Win7 is done installing, open up your Vista user folder, allow it to get access to the folder, then right click on the folder, go to the Security tab, and add yourself as a user and grant yourself full access to that folder. Then go back to Win7's user folder, view the properties of each of the folders (My Documents, Pictures, Videos, etc.) and under Location, point the directory path to that of the equivalent Vista user folder.

Saying all that, it's still easier to place your user folders on a separate partition. That way it's safe in case either the Vista or Win7 partition does kaput. ;)

I get what you are saying but what exactly do you want me to do?

At the moment I have one hard drive partitioned into drive C and drive K. So which folder should I install it in?

Also, I am going to run the installer within Vista. So after I install it, what exactly should I do?

Thanks!

I get what you are saying but what exactly do you want me to do?

At the moment I have one hard drive partitioned into drive C and drive K. So which folder should I install it in?

Also, I am going to run the installer within Vista. So after I install it, what exactly should I do?

Thanks!

If you're running the installer within Vista, then install 7 in drive K (assuming Vista is currently in C). After setup is complete, if you open Explorer in Windows 7, you'll find your drive layout to be the same as that in Vista.

I think if you run Win7's installer within Vista, it'll automatically mount your Vista partition as drive C after setup's done. So simply open up C:\Users\yourname and let it grant your user account access to your Vista user folder. From there, begin redirecting your user folders as explained above.

  • 9 months later...

ok guys, you all seem to know whats up so hopefully you guys can help me out..

im in law school and i was given a code to buy the windows 7 upgrade. i currently am running windows vista 32-bit on my laptop.

when i chose which version to download i accidentally picked the 64 bit. i havent downloaded it yet. my understanding is i cant "upgrade" from 32 to 64, i need to do a clean install...

my question is, what do i do next?

since i bought the upgrade, can i do a clean install?

since i havent downloaded anything yet, should i just try getting in contact with the distributor of the software and ask for a 32 bit instead?

what is my best choice?

  • 2 weeks later...

Vista 32-bit can be upgraded to Windows 7 64-bit using the Upgrade version.

Using the upgrade disks will allow you only to upgrade a 32-bit Vista to a 32-bit Windows 7. Inserting the Windows 7 64-bit upgrade disk will give a message that you can not upgrade a 32-bit Vista to a 64-bit Windows 7. The upgrade disk is a non-bootable DVD, so doing a clean install can not be done directly from the DVD.

How ever there is work around. Keep in mind that moving from 32-bit to 64-bit always means a fresh install!!

What you need is both the Windows 7 332-bit and 64-bit upgrade disks and follow these steps:

-Insert the 32-bit upgrade disk

-Wait for the window with "Install Now" to be displayed.

-Click "Install now"

-When asked, go online to download updates

-Accept license terms

-Wait for the window with the option for Upgrade or Custom/Advanced to appear

-When this window is displayed, eject the 32-bit upgrade disk and insert the 64-bit upgrade disk

-Select Custom/Advanced

-Select the disk and partition on which you want to do the new install

-If you select a disk with an existing Windows installation, you need to confirm you want to install on that disk

-The installation will start with copying Windows files and then Expanding Windows files

-Now the PC will be rebooted, while rebooting pay close attention and wait for the "PRESS ANY KEY TO BOOT FROM CD/DVD" message and hit any key. This step is crucial to this installation so be sure not to miss it. If you do miss this step, then the installation will fail with a DOS window........... You then have to start over again.

You now have created a situation where the installation actually starts all over, however there is no check if your existing OS is 32-bit or 64-bit. So the installation continues:

-Enter your region / language / keyboard settings

-Wait for the windows with "Install Now" to be displayed.

-Click "Install now"

-Accept license terms

-Select Custom/Advanced installation

-Select the disk and partition on which you want to do the new install

-The installation will start with copying Windows files, takes little time and then Expanding Windows files, which is now very slow, so be patient!!!!

-Follow the steps to complete your installation

That's it, your done.

I have tested this on both a Vista 32-bit laptop and a Vista 32-bit desktop and both have now Windows 7 64-bit installed on it.

  • 2 weeks later...

I hope I am doing this right and I get some feedback from the community. I have a problem for which I need help. Normally I am able to troubleshoot my computers myself but this problem is beyond my knowledge....

I have a costume made desktop which I was running on Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit version. I received my copy of Windows 7 with the 32-bit and 64-bit disks. I then tried to install the 64-bit but I got and error messages stating that I couldn't do the requested task. OK, I then tried to upgraded to the 32-bit windows 7. When I ran the compatibility check I was asked to remove the antivirus program which I did. I then tried to reboot the computer. The machine never rebooted again. I now get no POST, No Sound, No Video or nothing. All I see is the fans and I can hear the hard disk spinning but that's it. I don't recall doing anything else. Did I fried my CPU or Motherboard? Here are the specs and thank you for your support.

Motherboard is an ASUS P5N-SLI Deluxe

CPU is the E6600 with Thermal right TRUE 120 Black Heat Sink

2x2 Memory Sticks of Ballistx 240pin.

Video Card is 256gb, it is an Radeon

Power Supply is at 500w

Case is a CM Storm

I have a IDE 300gb HD

A normal DVD RW

etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!