Recommended Posts

I've been struggling with this for real long, and as i skimmed through some posts, others seem to be as well. When i try to add a folder which is on my NAS drive in any of the 4 default libraries, i get the following error message:

'This folder cannot be included because it is on a share that is not indexed'

Anyone figure out how to get by this, as i remember Microsoft has said, you can add network locations in Libraries.

  HawkMan said:
online helps says ou can but searches wil be slow asince it can't be indexed so it might be a bug.. or not added as a fucntion yet.

otherwise you coudl try mounting the network folder and try to add that...

Mounting the network folder, you mean mapping it as a drive?

i've already done that

My situation is a bit different to yours but I've had no problems adding shares on my WHS to my libraries. The difference is that the server is running Windows and the shares are all indexed.

I've really been looking forward to Libraries because I typically keep all my documents, music, videos, etc. on the WHS and Vista didn't handle replacing the default documents locations with network shares that elegantly. The new setup works perfectly for me.

  jakem1 said:
My situation is a bit different to yours but I've had no problems adding shares on my WHS to my libraries. The difference is that the server is running Windows and the shares are all indexed.

I've really been looking forward to Libraries because I typically keep all my documents, music, videos, etc. on the WHS and Vista didn't handle replacing the default documents locations with network shares that elegantly. The new setup works perfectly for me.

They're indexed on the server. They're not indexed for your win7 computer, it doesn't have access to the serves index database,

  HawkMan said:
They're indexed on the server. They're not indexed for your win7 computer, it doesn't have access to the serves index database,

That's not true actually. With Desktop Search 4.0 Windows can use indexes across the network. As a result Windows7 can use the index on the server to improve local search results.

I have a wireless NAS plugged into my router. I can map the drive fine, but it won't show up in the list of locations you can choose to index. Since you can't index it, Explorer won't let me add it to any Library. According to BrandonLive, there are no plans in place to implement indexing of network locations, which is pretty depressing. The workaround offered is to add these locations to your Library from within Windows Media Player.. just do the regular "Manage Libraries" and it won't complain when you pick the network drive.

The problems here are that the locations are still not indexed, so browsing in Explorer doesn't work as well as it should, and also this method only makes sense if you're dealing with Pictures, Music and Video. I can't add my Documents on the external drive to the Library.

BrandonLive also said that if the networked location is on a Vista PC you can index it and Windows 7 will pick it up (why it works on jakem1's WHS), but this useless for a simple networked hard drive.

The relevant quotes, for those interested:

  Brandon Live said:
The help text hasn't yet been finished. At this point, libraries only support indexed locations. There are ways around this (if you add it via WMP it will get added to your library, but it will severely degrade the Explorer libaries experience).

If the network share is on a Windows PC, you can install Windows Search 4 on it and index the share on the server side. Then your Win7 machine will be able to remotely query that index to provide the full rich libraries experience.

Another option that works for any network share is to use the Offline Files feature, which creates a local cache of the files that will always be indexed.

  Brandon Live said:
It's not planned to change at this time but we know it's a common concern. If you'd like to create one of those Win7 Taskforce pages for it (if there isn't one already) and give me the link, that may help track how many people want to use such functionality (basically, being able to index network shares).

At this point my recommendation would be to get a USB, Firewire, or eSATA drive.

In my case, I use a Windows Home Server PC that has its content indexed with WS4.

I can confirm that adding network location in Libraries for Music, Video and Pictures works through Windows Media Player. But still no luck for Documents library, which in my case is the most important!

Am sure there must be some workaround for Documents Library as well, just need to dig around!

I have a NAS using local network too. I have the same problem.

Since Windows Desktop Search 4 (for XP), it is possible to add remote locations to indexation list. However, Vista's default indexation engine does not allow that anymore.

Microsoft released an update for Windows Vista, allowing network indexation. It makes Windows Desktop Search look like XP's, with a UNC option.

This patch has no equivalent for Windows 7 yet. However, you shall be able to install it over official beta 1, as I did.

Evidence:

post-278494-1232150608_thumb.jpg

Afterwoods, my indexed places look like:

post-278494-1232150599_thumb.jpg

So that solves one part of the problem, but not all of it: even if you index your network shares, windows won't realize it, and you still won't be able to add them to any library...

One more thing: network indexation used to run smoothly over XP, but seems to be a little bit buggy over 7. Explorer.exe is likely to crash if you use the start menu real-time search.

  burnblue said:
I got so excited when you said the Vista patch worked for you... until you said "Windows won't realize it". Regardless, since I already added stuff to my Libraries via WMP, I'll try it and see what happens.

Were you able to add a network location in your Documents Library?

  mukati said:
Were you able to add a network location in your Documents Library?

No.

I downloaded the patch and it installed, then my mapped drive showed up in the index locations list. It looked nothing like Alvine's; I just got an extra checkbox. See:

post-275646-1232240537_thumb.png

However I'm not sure that indexing is actually occuring at all. You can see the screenshot says 'indexing complete', and I'm not sure if the network stuff was ever done. I don't have a way to see when it's actually indexing; I'd try that desktop gadget but 1) gadgets won't work for me and 2) I had to turn off my video driver and Aero.

Back to your question, when I try to add one of these locations to the Library, I get the same error as always (not indexed location). Also, when I try to do things with the WMP-added folders (Pictures, for eg.) like Arrange by Tag, it still tells me that the location is slow.

I dunno what to do man. Here's a thread on Channel 9 that seems to give evidence of what Microsoft was thinking when they left this out: http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehous...ommentID=453315

Edited by burnblue
  • 2 weeks later...

To add a non-indexed UNC as a library to Windows 7 Beta:

1. Create a folder on your hard drive for shares. i.e. c:\share

2. Create another folder in the above share. i.e. c:\share\music

2. Link the Library to this folder.

3. Delete the folder.

4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

5. Done. Now you have non-indexed UNC path as a library.

If you use symbolic links at a local folder and have the local indexing service work that ... you will increase network traffic possibly in an unefficient way.

Thnik like having your av-shield traversing local folders which are really remote.

But may be it can work if the indexer is optimized to understand that its working a networked and not local file system.

Usually it will not be so.

Mapped network drives are working as local volumes thus network traffic not optimized. So thats why mapped drives have performance issues and shares (networked file system) should be used instead (dynamic performance and can be configured in several ways for better performance either way).

Anyway - use process monitor to find out if indexer scans the network like it was local (if so you need to disable the links - or put those links on a local volume excluded from local indexer)

  dizman67 said:
To add a non-indexed UNC as a library to Windows 7 Beta:

1. Create a folder on your hard drive for shares. i.e. c:\share

2. Create another folder in the above share. i.e. c:\share\music

2. Link the Library to this folder.

3. Delete the folder.

4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

5. Done. Now you have non-indexed UNC path as a library.

FYI

About Windows Search 4.0 network performance (so the search services can be configured and are optimized for network traffic) ...

However, Windows Search services work client/server - and if you use symbolic links you make trick it into local file system performance behaviour and pay a penalty.

However, it would be smart if such services would discover using the network redirector across the link and go to network mode. I don't if they do that somehow - but know that last year my kaspersky Antivirus definitely did not do so when it walked the symbolic links to remote shares as if were local file system.

Anyone knows for sure?

Ref. Admin Guide 4.0:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770334.aspx

Network Performance

Enabling users to index network shares may temporarily increase the network traffic to these locations. The greatest impact on servers is seen building the initial index, and less impact is seen during subsequent incremental updates. Windows Search uses back-off logic to mitigate network traffic, and Group Policy further controls what Windows Search can index. For example, you can set a policy that disables indexing network paths to high volume servers.

  • 2 weeks later...
  dizman67 said:
4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

Hi.

Have you tried do that yourself?

I have the same problem, and unfortunately mklink cannot works with shares.

  Quote
cmd> mklink C:\Users\Godfather\Libraries\Music \\Server\Music

The syntax of the command is incorrect.

The same said here, for example.

  abatishchev said:
Hi.

Have you tried do that yourself?

I have the same problem, and unfortunately mklink cannot works with shares.

The same said here, for example.

Have you tried

mklink /d <target> <source>

?

default para is symbolic file link. you need to specify symbolic directory link with /d.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It was easy enough in Task Manager Performance tab already.
    • GeForce NOW adds support for 25 games in June, including Rematch and Dune: Awakening by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A new month is here, and Nvidia is starting it off with a big GeForce NOW announcement as usual. The latest reveal has support for 25 games that are incoming in June alone, with some highlights including Rematch, The Alters, FBC: Firebreak, Dune: Awakening, and even the Borderlands trilogy from Gearbox and 2K. Just this week alone, Nvidia is adding support for the following ten games for GeForce NOW subscribers: Symphonia (New release on Xbox, available on PC Game Pass, June 3) Pro Cycling Manager 25 (New release on Steam, June 5) Tour de France 2025 (New release on Steam, June 5) Dune: Awakening – Advanced Access (New release on Steam, June 5) 7 Days to Die (Xbox) Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 (Epic Games Store) Cubic Odyssey (Steam) Drive Beyond Horizons (Steam) Police Simulator: Patrol Officers (Xbox, available on PC Game Pass) Sea of Thieves (Battle.net) Nvidia also has plans to add a bunch more games in the rest of June, which is when most of the biggest new releases are coming: Dune: Awakening (New release on Steam, June 10) MindsEye (New release on Steam, June 10) The Alters (New release on Steam and Xbox, available on PC Game Pass, June 13) Architect Life: A House Design Simulator (New release on Steam, June 19) Crime Simulator (New release on Steam, June 17) FBC: Firebreak (New release on Steam and Xbox, available on PC Game Pass, June 17) Lost in Random: The Eternal Die (New release on Steam and Xbox, available on PC Game Pass, June 17) Broken Arrow (New release on Steam, June 19) REMATCH (New release on Steam and Xbox, available on PC Game Pass, June 19) DREADZONE (New release on Steam, June 26) System Shock 2: 25th Anniversary Remaster (New release on Steam, June 26) Borderlands Game of the Year Enhanced (Steam) Borderlands 2 (Steam and Epic Games Store) Borderlands 3 (Steam and Epic Games Store) Easy Red 2 (Steam) The company has a tendency to add many more games to its cloud gaming service outside of these early announcements, so check back as weeks go by to see what's new. Steam Deck owners recently received a better way of using GeForce NOW too, all thanks to a dedicated app. As summer continues, don't forget that the GeForce NOW 40% off sale is still active too, with Nvidia cutting the price of the Performance membership plan until July. As always, keep in mind that unlike subscription services like Game Pass, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers.
    • Thought I'd quote myself as reference to what was happening yesterday. I wasn't getting the pop up then in Firefox, but I did just now using it.
    • With DARPA the military can do their own research and then the tech can enter the public domain and benefit the people. If we use public money to buy privatized tech then we don't get that benefit and even worse we will probably pay higher prices in the end. Unfortunately we are ditching NASA for private tech. If you look at all of the technologies developed by NASA that benefit us, you can see why going private can be a huge loss and jack up prices for consumers when private patents are involved. This could have a detrimental effect on innovation by monopolizing certain advancements and reduce access to advancements for the average person, even though our tax dollars would be funding these advancements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      jbatch earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Yianis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      GTRoberts went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      175
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      170
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!