Recommended Posts

I've been struggling with this for real long, and as i skimmed through some posts, others seem to be as well. When i try to add a folder which is on my NAS drive in any of the 4 default libraries, i get the following error message:

'This folder cannot be included because it is on a share that is not indexed'

Anyone figure out how to get by this, as i remember Microsoft has said, you can add network locations in Libraries.

online helps says ou can but searches wil be slow asince it can't be indexed so it might be a bug.. or not added as a fucntion yet.

otherwise you coudl try mounting the network folder and try to add that...

Mounting the network folder, you mean mapping it as a drive?

i've already done that

My situation is a bit different to yours but I've had no problems adding shares on my WHS to my libraries. The difference is that the server is running Windows and the shares are all indexed.

I've really been looking forward to Libraries because I typically keep all my documents, music, videos, etc. on the WHS and Vista didn't handle replacing the default documents locations with network shares that elegantly. The new setup works perfectly for me.

My situation is a bit different to yours but I've had no problems adding shares on my WHS to my libraries. The difference is that the server is running Windows and the shares are all indexed.

I've really been looking forward to Libraries because I typically keep all my documents, music, videos, etc. on the WHS and Vista didn't handle replacing the default documents locations with network shares that elegantly. The new setup works perfectly for me.

They're indexed on the server. They're not indexed for your win7 computer, it doesn't have access to the serves index database,

They're indexed on the server. They're not indexed for your win7 computer, it doesn't have access to the serves index database,

That's not true actually. With Desktop Search 4.0 Windows can use indexes across the network. As a result Windows7 can use the index on the server to improve local search results.

I have a wireless NAS plugged into my router. I can map the drive fine, but it won't show up in the list of locations you can choose to index. Since you can't index it, Explorer won't let me add it to any Library. According to BrandonLive, there are no plans in place to implement indexing of network locations, which is pretty depressing. The workaround offered is to add these locations to your Library from within Windows Media Player.. just do the regular "Manage Libraries" and it won't complain when you pick the network drive.

The problems here are that the locations are still not indexed, so browsing in Explorer doesn't work as well as it should, and also this method only makes sense if you're dealing with Pictures, Music and Video. I can't add my Documents on the external drive to the Library.

BrandonLive also said that if the networked location is on a Vista PC you can index it and Windows 7 will pick it up (why it works on jakem1's WHS), but this useless for a simple networked hard drive.

The relevant quotes, for those interested:

The help text hasn't yet been finished. At this point, libraries only support indexed locations. There are ways around this (if you add it via WMP it will get added to your library, but it will severely degrade the Explorer libaries experience).

If the network share is on a Windows PC, you can install Windows Search 4 on it and index the share on the server side. Then your Win7 machine will be able to remotely query that index to provide the full rich libraries experience.

Another option that works for any network share is to use the Offline Files feature, which creates a local cache of the files that will always be indexed.

It's not planned to change at this time but we know it's a common concern. If you'd like to create one of those Win7 Taskforce pages for it (if there isn't one already) and give me the link, that may help track how many people want to use such functionality (basically, being able to index network shares).

At this point my recommendation would be to get a USB, Firewire, or eSATA drive.

In my case, I use a Windows Home Server PC that has its content indexed with WS4.

I can confirm that adding network location in Libraries for Music, Video and Pictures works through Windows Media Player. But still no luck for Documents library, which in my case is the most important!

Am sure there must be some workaround for Documents Library as well, just need to dig around!

I have a NAS using local network too. I have the same problem.

Since Windows Desktop Search 4 (for XP), it is possible to add remote locations to indexation list. However, Vista's default indexation engine does not allow that anymore.

Microsoft released an update for Windows Vista, allowing network indexation. It makes Windows Desktop Search look like XP's, with a UNC option.

This patch has no equivalent for Windows 7 yet. However, you shall be able to install it over official beta 1, as I did.

Evidence:

post-278494-1232150608_thumb.jpg

Afterwoods, my indexed places look like:

post-278494-1232150599_thumb.jpg

So that solves one part of the problem, but not all of it: even if you index your network shares, windows won't realize it, and you still won't be able to add them to any library...

One more thing: network indexation used to run smoothly over XP, but seems to be a little bit buggy over 7. Explorer.exe is likely to crash if you use the start menu real-time search.

I got so excited when you said the Vista patch worked for you... until you said "Windows won't realize it". Regardless, since I already added stuff to my Libraries via WMP, I'll try it and see what happens.

Were you able to add a network location in your Documents Library?

Were you able to add a network location in your Documents Library?

No.

I downloaded the patch and it installed, then my mapped drive showed up in the index locations list. It looked nothing like Alvine's; I just got an extra checkbox. See:

post-275646-1232240537_thumb.png

However I'm not sure that indexing is actually occuring at all. You can see the screenshot says 'indexing complete', and I'm not sure if the network stuff was ever done. I don't have a way to see when it's actually indexing; I'd try that desktop gadget but 1) gadgets won't work for me and 2) I had to turn off my video driver and Aero.

Back to your question, when I try to add one of these locations to the Library, I get the same error as always (not indexed location). Also, when I try to do things with the WMP-added folders (Pictures, for eg.) like Arrange by Tag, it still tells me that the location is slow.

I dunno what to do man. Here's a thread on Channel 9 that seems to give evidence of what Microsoft was thinking when they left this out: http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehous...ommentID=453315

Edited by burnblue
  • 2 weeks later...

To add a non-indexed UNC as a library to Windows 7 Beta:

1. Create a folder on your hard drive for shares. i.e. c:\share

2. Create another folder in the above share. i.e. c:\share\music

2. Link the Library to this folder.

3. Delete the folder.

4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

5. Done. Now you have non-indexed UNC path as a library.

If you use symbolic links at a local folder and have the local indexing service work that ... you will increase network traffic possibly in an unefficient way.

Thnik like having your av-shield traversing local folders which are really remote.

But may be it can work if the indexer is optimized to understand that its working a networked and not local file system.

Usually it will not be so.

Mapped network drives are working as local volumes thus network traffic not optimized. So thats why mapped drives have performance issues and shares (networked file system) should be used instead (dynamic performance and can be configured in several ways for better performance either way).

Anyway - use process monitor to find out if indexer scans the network like it was local (if so you need to disable the links - or put those links on a local volume excluded from local indexer)

To add a non-indexed UNC as a library to Windows 7 Beta:

1. Create a folder on your hard drive for shares. i.e. c:\share

2. Create another folder in the above share. i.e. c:\share\music

2. Link the Library to this folder.

3. Delete the folder.

4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

5. Done. Now you have non-indexed UNC path as a library.

FYI

About Windows Search 4.0 network performance (so the search services can be configured and are optimized for network traffic) ...

However, Windows Search services work client/server - and if you use symbolic links you make trick it into local file system performance behaviour and pay a penalty.

However, it would be smart if such services would discover using the network redirector across the link and go to network mode. I don't if they do that somehow - but know that last year my kaspersky Antivirus definitely did not do so when it walked the symbolic links to remote shares as if were local file system.

Anyone knows for sure?

Ref. Admin Guide 4.0:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770334.aspx

Network Performance

Enabling users to index network shares may temporarily increase the network traffic to these locations. The greatest impact on servers is seen building the initial index, and less impact is seen during subsequent incremental updates. Windows Search uses back-off logic to mitigate network traffic, and Group Policy further controls what Windows Search can index. For example, you can set a policy that disables indexing network paths to high volume servers.

  • 2 weeks later...
4. Use the mklink in a command window(administrator access needed) to make a symbolic link. Name the link the same as the folder you created above. i.e - mklink c:\share\music \\server\music

Hi.

Have you tried do that yourself?

I have the same problem, and unfortunately mklink cannot works with shares.

cmd> mklink C:\Users\Godfather\Libraries\Music \\Server\Music

The syntax of the command is incorrect.

The same said here, for example.

Hi.

Have you tried do that yourself?

I have the same problem, and unfortunately mklink cannot works with shares.

The same said here, for example.

Have you tried

mklink /d <target> <source>

?

default para is symbolic file link. you need to specify symbolic directory link with /d.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!